Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Sleeve gastrectomy is gaining relevance in the surgical armamentarium against obesity. The transumbilical single port has proved to be an attractive and safe alternative for a variety of minimally invasive abdominal surgeries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the initial results of a group of patients operated by single-port sleeve gastrectomy compared with a group operated by conventional laparoscopic technique.

Patients and methods

We present a prospective cohort study of two groups of consecutive patients with body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 55 kg/m2, with an indication of sleeve gastrectomy. In 20 patients, we used a transumbilical single-port (TUSP) technique; in 22 patients, we used the conventional laparoscopic (CL) technique. All surgeries were performed between June and December 2009 in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Hospital Clínic, Barcelona. The same medical team, in a standardized fashion, carried out all surgeries.

Results

There were no differences between groups in body mass index (BMI), age, sex, number and type of comorbidities, or history of previous abdominal surgery. Operative time (79.2 min) was significantly higher in the TUSP group (p = 0.002) than in the CL group (54.1 min). There were no conversions to open surgery in any of the patients operated upon via CL, but one conversion to laparoscopic surgery, requiring the addition of three trocars, in the TUSP group. There were no significant differences in morbidity or hospital stay between the groups. Percentage excess weight loss and excess BMI loss at 3 and 6 months, as indexes for improvement and resolution of comorbidities associated with obesity, showed that there were no significant differences between the groups.

Conclusions

Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy has proved to be safe, technically feasible, and reproducible, with results that are similar to those obtained with conventional laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Overweight and Obesity. Factsheet no. 311. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html September 2006

  2. Hosain P, Kawar B, El Nahas M (2007) Obesity and diabetes in the developing World. A growing challenge. N Engl J Med 356:213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colquitt JL, Picot J, Loveman E, Clegg AJ (2009) Surgery for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2) CD003641. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub3

  4. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292:1724–1737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean AP, MacLean LD (2004) Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg 240:416–423 discussion 423–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchwald H, Buchwald JN (2002) Evolution of operative procedures for the management of morbid obesity, 1950–2000. Obes Surg 12:705–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabkin RA, Rabkin JM, Metcalf B, Lazo M, Rossi M, Lee BL (2003) Laparoscopic technique for performing duodenal switch with gastric reduction. Obes Surg 13:263–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M (2000) Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 10(6):514–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Langer FB, Reza Hoda MA, Bohdjalian A (2005) Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg 15(7):1024–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deitel M, Crosby RD, Gagner M (2008) The first international consensus summit for Sleeve gastrectomy (SG), New York City, October 25–27, 2007. Obes Surg 18:487–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview review. Surg Endosc 23:1419–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Stamos MJ (2009) A single-port technique for laparoscopic extended staple appendectomy. Surg Innovat 16:78–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuesta MA, Berends F, Veenhof AA (2008) The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc 22(5):1211–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De la Torre RA, Satgunam S, Morales MP, Dwyer CL, Scott JS (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with liver suture retractor. Obes Surg 19:1707–1710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, Arun JR (2008) Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique. Obes Surg 18:1338–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH (2009) Early experience with SILS port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(6):428–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arias N, Prada NE, Gomez D, Torres A (2010) Transumbilical sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2:232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Madan A, Iglesias A (2009) Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. In: Proceedings of the V046. International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders. XIV World Congress Palais des Congre`s (Porte Maillot) – Paris, France August 26-29, 2009

  19. Bessler M, Milone L (2008) Sleeve gastrectomy in an animal model. In: Proceedings of the P120 American Society for metabolic and bariatric surgery meeting. Washington DC, 2008

  20. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Savu MK, Cullen J, Chock A, Ramamoorthy S, Easter DW, Talamini MA (2008) Hybrid natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES) slleve gastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model. Surg Endosc 22:1798–1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ (2008) Indications for sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for weigth loss im the morbidly obese. J Gastrointest Surg 12:662–667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué J, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Rojas OA, Almenara R, Blasi A, Llach J (2008) MA-NOS radical sigmoidectomy: report of a transvaginal resection in the human. Surg Endosc 22:1717–1723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Rojas OA, Ibarzabal A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Taura P (2009) Hybrid vaginal MA-NOS sleeve gastrectomy: technical note on the procedure in a patient. Surg Endosc 23:1130–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu JF (2009) Wich term is better: SILS, SPA, LESS. E-NOTES, or TUES? Surg Endosc 23:1164–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ponsky JL, Rosen MJ, Poulose BK (2008) NOTES: of caution. Surg Endosc 22:1561–1562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang CK, Houng JY, Chiang CJ, Chen YS, Lee OH (2009) Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric by pass: a first report. Obes Surg 19:1711–1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang CK, Tsai JC, Lo CH, Houng JY, Chen YS, Chi SC, Lee PH (2010) Preliminary surgical results of single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg; published online: doi10.1007/s11695-009-0071-9

  29. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Sledge I (2007) Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 142:621–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fucks D, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, Sabbagh C, Dumont F, Riboulot M, Delcenserie R, Regimbeau JM (2009) Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery 145:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee CM, Cirangle PT, Jossart GH (2007) Vertical gastrectomy for morbid obesity in 216 patients: report of two-year results. Surg Endosc 21:1810–1816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadiere GB (2006) A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg 16:1450–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Han MS, Kim WW, Oh JH (2005) Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at 1 year in morbidly obese Korean patients. Obes Surg 15:1469–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar SG (2006) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 20:859–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Authors Salvadora Delgado, Cedric Adelsdorfer, Waldemar Adelsdorfer, Ainitze Ibarzabal, Ricard Corcelles, and Dulce Momblán have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Author Antonio Lacy is a consultant for Covidien and for Olympus Medical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvadora Delgado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delgado, S., Ibarzabal, A., Adelsdorfer, C. et al. Transumbilical single-port sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience and comparative study. Surg Endosc 26, 1247–1253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2002-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2002-9

Keywords

Navigation