Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is an evolving surgical alternative to traditional open esophagectomy. Despite considerable technical challenges, it was hypothesized that MIE could be performed effectively by surgeons experienced in open esophageal resection and advanced laparoscopic surgery. The authors report their experience with 25 patients who underwent MIE for esophageal disease.

Methods

A multidisciplinary esophageal cancer team evaluated all the patients enrolled in this institutional review board–approved retrospective review study. Over an 18-month period, 25 consecutive patients (22 men and 3 women; mean age, 62 years; range, 48–77 years) with resectable esophageal cancer underwent MIE. Six patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The preoperative diagnoses were adenocarcinoma (64%, n = 16), high-grade dysplasia (20%, n = 5), and squamous cell cancer (16%, n = 4). The outcomes evaluated included operative course, hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, pathologic stage, morbidity, and mortality.

Results

Two patients required conversion to open esophagectomy. Operative mortality was 4% (n = 1). The mean operative time was 350 min (range, 300–480), and the average blood loss was 200 ml. The patients remained ventilated for a median of 12 h, and the median intensive care unit utilization was 1 day. The median hospital length of stay was 9 days (range, 6–33 days). Major complications occurred in 32% of the patients. The anastomotic leak rate was 12%. Minor pulmonary complications occurred in 32% and atrial fibrillation in 16% of the patients. An anastomotic stricture developed in 24% of all the patients. One patient showed a positive proximal margin in the final pathology results.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a technically challenging procedure that can be performed safely at the Virginia Piper Cancer Institute. Optimal results require appropriate patient selection and a multidisciplinary team experienced in the management of esophageal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. New Engl J Med 346: 1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Branicki FJ, Law SY, Fok M, Poon R, Chu KM, Wong J (1998) Quality of life in patients with cancer of the esophagus and gastric cardia: a case for palliative resection. Arch Surg 133: 316–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198: 536–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enziger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Medical progress: esophageal cancer. New Engl J Med 349: 2241–2252

    Google Scholar 

  5. Law S, Wong J (1999) Does lymphadenectomy add anything to the treatment of esophageal cancer? Adv Surg 33: 311–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238: 486–495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135: 920–925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197: 902–913

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230: 392–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino N, Takada N, Lee S, Ueno M, Tanaka Y, Fukuhara K, Hashimoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita H (2003) Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagetomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc 17: 515–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuchert MJ, Luketich JD, Fernando HC (2004) Complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 16: 133–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiozaki H, Imamoto H, Shigeoka H, Imano M, Yano M (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy with 10 cm thoracotomy assisted thoracoscopy for the thoracic esophageal cancer. Gan to Kagaku Ryoho 30: 923–928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegments

The authors thank Dr. Timothy Sielaff for his help with this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55047, USA

    G. Collins, E. Johnson, T. Kroshus & D. Dunn

  2. Department of Medicine, Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55047, USA

    R. Ganz, J. Seng & O. Nwaneri

  3. Department of Pathology, Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55047, USA

    K. Batts

Authors
  1. G. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Kroshus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Ganz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Batts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Seng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. O. Nwaneri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. D. Dunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Dunn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, G., Johnson, E., Kroshus, T. et al. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 20, 298–301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0093-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0093-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation