Skip to main content
Log in

Open vs laparoscopic repair of secondary lumbar hernias: a prospective nonrandomized study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lumbar hernias are uncommon defects of the posterior abdominal wall. Surgical treatment is still controversial in these cases. The aim of this study was to compare outcome and costs of the laparoscopic approach vs the open method.

Methods

We conducted a prospective nonrandomized study of 16 patients who underwent operation for secondary lumbar hernia between January 1997 and January 2003. Hine were treated via the laparoscopic approach and seven with an open technique. The following variables were analyzed: clinical data, hospital data (operating time and length of stay), patient comfort (consumption of analgesics and time to return to normal activities), and recurrences. Hospital costs were also analyzed.

Results

There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age and history, although the defects of the patients in the laparoscopic group were smaller. Mean operating time, postoperative morbidity, mean hospital stay, consumption of analgesics, and time to return to normal activities were significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (p < 0. 01). No were there any statistical differences between the two types of surgical procedure in terms of hospital costs. However, the final cost did show differences when expenses for readmissions and recurrences were taken into account (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The laparoscopic approach to secondary lumbar hernia repair is more efficient and more profitable than the traditional open technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexandre, JH, Bouillot, Jl (1994) “Traiteiment chirurgical des hernies lombaires” In: Horay, P. Encycl. Med. Chir. Techniques chirurgicales—Appareil digestif, Elsevier, paris, pp 40–152

  2. MJ Arca BT Heniford R Pokorny MA Wilson J Meyes M Gadner (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic repair of lumbar hernias J Am Coll Surg 187 147–152 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czmvVKmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9704960

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A Bickel M Haj A Eitan (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic management of lumbar hernia Surg Endosc 11 1129–1130 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fht1arsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9348391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MA Carbajo JC Martín Olmo Particledel JI Blanco et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh Surg Endosc 11 32–35

    Google Scholar 

  5. HB Devlin A. Kingsnorth (1998) Lumbar hernia HB Devlin A Kingsnorth (Eds) Management of abdominal hernias EditionNumber2 Chapman & Hall Medical London 223–224

    Google Scholar 

  6. WP Geis GT Hodakowski (1995) Lumbar hernia LM Nyhus RE Condon (Eds) Hernia EditionNumber14 JB Lippincott Philadelphia 412–423

    Google Scholar 

  7. BT Heniford DA Iannitti M Gadner (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic inferior and superior lumbar hernia repair Arch Surg 132 1141–1144 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2sjltFc%3D Occurrence Handle9336516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. BT Heniford A Park B J Ramshaw G Voeller (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients J Am Coll Surg 190 645–650 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czivFequw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10872998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A Moreno-Egea JL Aguayo (2002) ArticleTitleAmbulatory laparoscopic repair of inferior lumbar or petit hernia: a case report Surg Endos 16 1107 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vhtFGisg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A Moreno-Egea L Carrasco E Girela JG Martín JL Aguayo M Canteras (2002) ArticleTitleOpen vs laparoscopic repair of spigelian hernia: a prospective randomized trial Archi Surg 137 1266–1268

    Google Scholar 

  11. A Moreno-Egea JA Castillo JL Aguayo (2002) ArticleTitleDay surgery for laparoscopic repair of ambominal wall hernias: our experience in 300 patients Hernia 6 21–25 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zks12isQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12090576

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. BJ Ramshaw P Esartia J Schwab (1999) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy Am Surg 65 827–831 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvhtFyrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10484084

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. BE Wright BD Niskanen DJ Peterson AL Ney MD Odland J Camp ParticleVan RT Zera et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic ventral hernia repair: are there comparative advantages over traditional methods of repair? Am Surg 68 291–296 Occurrence Handle11893110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Moreno-Egea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moreno-Egea, A., Torralba-Martinez, J.A., Morales, G. et al. Open vs laparoscopic repair of secondary lumbar hernias: a prospective nonrandomized study. Surg Endosc 19, 184–187 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9067-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9067-7

Keywords

Navigation