Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Side-overlap esophagogastric tube (SO-EG) reconstruction after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy or laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction

  • How-I-Do-It articles
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Both laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with lower esophagectomy (extended LPG) and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE) are acceptable treatments for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), but the optimal reconstruction technique for mediastinal esophagogastrostomy (one that provides adequate reflux prevention) has not been established. We devised a novel side-overlap esophagogastric-tube (SO-EG) reconstruction.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patient records after LPG or MIILE. In each patient, we created a 3-cm wide gastric tube, overlapping the esophagus by 5 cm. A linear stapler was inserted into the left side of the esophageal stump and the anterior gastric wall along the greater curvature. The entry hole was closed to make a slit-like anastomosis, and the right side of the esophageal wall was fixed to the anterior gastric wall.

Results

Ten consecutive patients underwent this procedure between June 2020 and July 2021. Five patients had Siewert type II AEG: 4 with lower thoracic esophageal cancer and 1 with benign lower esophageal stenosis. A total of 3 patients underwent extended LPG, and 7 underwent MIILE. The median operative time was 352 min (range, 221–556 min). The postoperative course was uneventful in 9 patients; a single patient developed pneumonia. Seven patients underwent follow-up endoscopy at 6 months. One patient with anastomotic stenosis and 2 with mild reflux esophagitis were treated conservatively.

Conclusion

Our novel SO-EG reconstruction is simple and feasible, with acceptable results for preventing reflux esophagitis. This technique can be performed with either extended LPG or MIILE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Imamura Y, Watanabe M, Toihata T, Takamatsu M, Kawachi H, Haraguchi I, Ogata Y, Yoshida N, Saeki H, Oki E, Taguchi K, Yamamoto M, Morita M, Mine S, Hiki N, Baba H, Sano T (2019) Recent incidence trend of surgically resected esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability status in Japanese patients. Digestion 99:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steevens J, Botterweck AAM, Dirx MJM, van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ (2010) Trends in incidence of oesophageal and stomach cancer subtypes in Europe. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:669–678. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832ca091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollschweiler E, Wolfgarten E, Gutschow C, Hölscher AH (2001) Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males. Cancer 92:549–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<549::aid-cncr1354>3.0.co;2-l

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurokawa Y, Takeuchi H, Doki Y, Mine S, Terashima M, Yasuda T, Yoshida K, Daiko H, Sakuramoto S, Yoshikawa T, Kunisaki C, Seto Y, Tamura S, Shimokawa T, Sano T, Kitagawa Y (2021) Mapping of lymph node metastasis from esophagogastric junction tumors: a prospective nationwide multicenter study. Ann Surg 274:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumamoto T, Kurahashi Y, Niwa H, Nakanishi Y, Okumura K, Ozawa R, Ishida Y, Shinohara H (2020) True esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: background of its definition and current surgical trends. Surg Today 50:809–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01843-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sugita S, Kinoshita T, Kaito A, Watanabe M, Sunagawa H (2018) Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surg Endosc 32:383–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5687-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi Y, Li L, Xiao H, Guo S, Wang G, Tao K, Dong J, Zong L (2018) Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with Siewert-type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a propensity score matching analysis. PLoS One 13:e0203125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamikawa YKT, Ueyama S (2001) A new antireflux procedure in esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. Shokakigeka 24:1053–1060

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hayami M, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Mine S, Ohashi M, Kumagai K, Ida S, Watanabe M, Sano T, Yamaguchi T (2017) Clinical outcomes and evaluation of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5782-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosoda K, Yamashita K, Moriya H, Washio M, Mieno H, Ema A, Watanabe M (2018) Esophagogastric junction cancer successfully treated by laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and lower esophagectomy with intrathoracic double-flap technique: a case report. Asian J Endosc Surg 11:160–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Omori T, Yamamoto K, Yanagimoto Y, Shinno N, Sugimura K, Takahashi H, Yasui M, Wada H, Miyata H, Ohue M, Yano M, Sakon M (2021) A novel valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy technique for laparoscopic transhiatal lower esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction carcinoma-the tri double-flap hybrid method. J Gastrointest Surg 25:16–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04547-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okabe H, Obama K, Tanaka E, Tsunoda S, Akagami M, Sakai Y (2013) Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with a hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis using a knifeless endoscopic linear stapler. Gastric Cancer 16:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0181-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Komatsu S, Kosuga T, Kubota T, Kumano T, Okamoto K, Ichikawa D, Shioaki Y, Otsuji E (2020) Non-flap hand-sewn esophagogastrostomy as a simple anti-reflux procedure in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 405:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01900-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamashita Y, Yamamoto A, Tamamori Y, Yoshii M, Nishiguchi Y (2017) Side overlap esophagogastrostomy to prevent reflux after proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 20:728–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0674-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH (2017) 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 6:119–130. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.03.14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, Johnson F, Hongo M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L (1999) Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 45:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.45.2.172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosogi H, Yoshimura F, Yamaura T, Satoh S, Uyama I, Kanaya S (2014) Esophagogastric tube reconstruction with stapled pseudo-fornix in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a novel technique proposed for Siewert type II tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1163-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Akagawa S, Hosogi H, Yoshimura F, Kawada H, Kanaya S (2018) Mesenteric excision for esophageal cancer surgery: based on the concept of mesotracheoesophagus. Int Cancer Conf J 7:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-018-0329-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mine S, Kurokawa Y, Takeuchi H, Kishi K, Ito Y, Ohi M, Matsuda T, Hamakawa T, Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T, Hiki N (2015) Distribution of involved abdominal lymph nodes is correlated with the distance from the esophagogastric junction to the distal end of the tumor in Siewert type II tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1348–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakaguchi M, Hosogi H, Kanaya S (2021) Laparoscopic en bloc lower mediastinal lymph node dissection via transhiatal approach for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Surg Oncol 36:34–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahn SH, Jung DH, Son SY, Lee CM, Park DJ, Kim HH (2014) Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17:562–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0303-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hölscher AH, Law S (2020) Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: individualization of resection with special considerations for Siewert type II, and Nishi types EG, E=G and GE cancers. Gastric Cancer 23:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-01022-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holloway RH (2000) The anti-reflux barrier and mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 14:681–699. https://doi.org/10.1053/bega.2000.0118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, Aye RW, Mercer CD, Low DE, Pope CE 2nd (1996) The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc 44:541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70006-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen XF, Zhang B, Chen ZX, Hu JK, Dai B, Wang F, Yang HX, Chen JP (2012) Gastric tube reconstruction reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Dig Dis Sci 57:738–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1920-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, Zhang K, Chen LQ (2011) Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:915–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1490-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Okabe H, Tsunoda S, Sunagawa H, Saji M, Hirai K, Nakau M, Tanaka E, Obama K (2021) A long-term follow-up study of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis. Surg Endosc [online ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08482-2

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Code availability

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: HH and SK. Acquisition of data: HH and MS. Analysis and interpretation of data: HH and SK. Drafting of manuscript: HH. Critical revision of manuscript: DY, RO, YH, MS, YS, and SK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisahiro Hosogi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital (IRB J-0264).

Consent to participate

The requirement to obtain individual patient consent was waived by the ethics committee of Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital, given the retrospective nature of the case series.

Consent for publication

All authors have provided consent for the article to be published in the Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Fig. 1.

Trocar position in a) extended LPG and b) MIILE. The third, fifth, seventh, and ninth intercostal spaces are noted. The number in a circle shows the size of the trocar (mm). SA, scapular angle line; PA, posterior axillary line; MA, middle axillary line (DOCX 163 kb)

(MP4 371592 kb)

(MP4 392528 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosogi, H., Sakaguchi, M., Yagi, D. et al. Side-overlap esophagogastric tube (SO-EG) reconstruction after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy or laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 861–869 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02377-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02377-5

Keywords

Navigation