Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aphasia assessment and functional outcome prediction in patients with aphasia after stroke

  • Medical Progress in the Journal of Neurology
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Available studies did not clarify whether a language examination may predict functional and motor outcome in patients with aphasia undergoing rehabilitation. This was the aim of the current study. Language examination considered in this study was the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT). One hundred fifty-six patients with a primary diagnosis of acute cerebrovascular accident of left hemisphere were included: 105 with and 51 without aphasia. Backward stepwise regression analysis was used to predict final scores in total-, motor-, and cognitive-Functional Independence Measure (FIM). The independent variables were age, gender, stroke type, stroke lesion size, onset to admission interval, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Fugl-Meyer Scale, Trunk Control Test, initial motor-FIM, and AAT (spontaneous speech, token test, repetition, written language, confrontation naming, comprehension). In the multivariate regression analysis, comprehension was the only function of the language to be predictor of the final total-FIM (β = +0.35) and final cognitive-FIM (β = +0.61). Comprehension was a predictor of total-FIM (β = +0.27) and cognitive-FIM (β = +0.54) as well, when additional backward stepwise regression analysis (which did not include comprehension and expression scores in the final total- and cognitive-FIM) was performed. When multivariate regression analysis took into consideration only language functions as independent variables, spontaneous speech (β = +0.41) only was the predictor of motor-FIM. The study highlights that AAT is the predictor of functional outcome in the patient with aphasia. Among the functions of language, comprehension seems to be the most important predictive factor of total- and cognitive-FIM, while spontaneous speech seems to be a predictor of motor-FIM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams JHP, Davis PH, Leira EC, Baseline NIH (1999) Stroke scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke. A report of the trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST). Neurology 3:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demchuk AM, Buchan AM (2000) Predictors of stroke outcome. Neurol Clin 19:455–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, Hsueh IP, Wang CH (2002) Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients. Stroke 33:2626–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, Enderby PM (1986) Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49(1):11–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Grasso MG (1998) Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high response patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 8:228–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gialanella B, Prometti P (2009) Rehabilitation length of stay in patients suffering from aphasia after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 16(6):437–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwa VIH, Limburg M, de Haan R (1996) The role of cognitive impairment in the quality of live after ischaemic stroke. J Neurol 243:599–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1996) The impact of aphasia on ADL and social activities after stoke: the Copenhagen stroke study. J Neuro Rehabil 10:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taub NA, Wolfe CD, Richardson E, Burney PG (1994) Predicting the disability of first-time stroke sufferers at 1 year. 12-month follow-up of a population-based cohort in southeast England. Stroke 25(2):352–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang Y, Chen X, Li H, Lin J, Huang R, Zeng J (2003) A study on additional early physiotherapy after stroke and factors affecting functional recovery. Clin Rehabil 17:608–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gialanella B, Bertolinelli M, Lissi M, Prometti P (2010) Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of aphasia. Disabil Rehabil 33:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Basso A, Capitani E, Vignolo LA (1979) Influence of rehabilitation on language skills in aphasic patients.A controlled study. Arch Neurol 36:190–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holland AL (1980) Communicative abilities in daily living. University Park Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kertesz A (1982) Western aphasia battery. The Psychological Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huber W, Poek K, Weniger D, Wilmes K (1983) Aachener aphasie test. Hogrefe, Gőttingen

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goodglass H, Kaplan E (1992) The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paolucci S, Matano A, Bragoni M et al (2005) Rehabilitation of left brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: the role of comprehension language deficits. Cerebrovasc Dis 20:400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayo NE, Korner-Bitensky NA, Becker R (1991) Recovery time of independent function post-stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 70:5–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Demir SO, Altinok N, Aydin G, Kòseoglu F (2006) Functional and cognitive progress in aphasic patients with traumatic brain injury during post-acute phase. Brain Inj 20:1383–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Adler A (1964) The Bobath method in the treatment of cerebral palsy. Harefuah 66:62–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Howard D, Hatfield FM (1987) Aphasia therapy. LEA, Londra

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hartman-Maier A, Soroker N, Ring H, Katz N (2002) Awareness of deficits in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 34:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luzzati C, Wilmes K, De Bleser R (1991) Aachener aphasie test (AAT). Organizzazioni speciali, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP et al (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864–870

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7:13–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Collin C, Wade D (1990) Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg psychiatry 53:576–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC (1993) Functional assessment: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:133–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, Schepers VP, Lindeman E (2006) Predicting mobility outcome one year after stroke: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med 38:218–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jehkonen M, Ahonen JP, Dastidar P et al (2001) Predictors of discharge to home during the first year after right hemisphere stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 104:136–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Natterlund BS (2009) A new life with aphasia: everyday activities and social support. Scand J Occup Ther 16:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  31. Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, Hickson L, Togher L (2008) Social participation for older people with aphasia: the impact of communication disability on friendships. Top Stroke Rehabil 15:307–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oder W, Hufgard J, Binder H, Zeiler K, Deecke L (1991) Depression, non verbal intellectual impairment and quality of life following left-brain ischemic insult—results of a catamnestic study. Rehabilitation 30:69–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Greig CA, Harper R, Hirst T, Howe T, Davidson B (2008) Barriers and facilitators to mobile phone use for people with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 15:307–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pandiani G (1984) Una misura della comprensione funzionale nell’afasia. Europa Medicophysica 20:9–21

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dalemans R, Wade DT, van den Heuvel WJ, de Witte LP (2009) Facilitating the participation of people with aphasia in research: a description of strategies. Clinical Rehabilitation 23:948–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kertesz A, McCabe P (1977) Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Brain 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steinvil Y, Ring H, Luz Y, Schechter I, Solzi P (1985) Type of aphasia: relationship to age, sex, previous risk factors, and outcome of rehabilitation. Scand J Rehabil Med 12:68–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chae J, Johnston M, Kim H, Zorowitz R (1995) Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 74:218–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fong NK, Chan CC, Au DK (2001) Relationship of motor and cognitive abilities to functional performance in stroke rehabilitation. Brain Inj 15:443–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lorish TR, Sandin KJ, Roth EJ (1994) Stroke rehabilitation. Rehabilitation evaluation and management. Arch J Phys Med Rehabil 75:47–51

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Laura Comini for critical review of the data and Alessandro Bettini for editing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unità Operativa di Recupero e Rieducazione Funzionale, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Mazzini 129, 25066, Lumezzane, BS, Italy

    Bernardo Gialanella

Authors
  1. Bernardo Gialanella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Gialanella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gialanella, B. Aphasia assessment and functional outcome prediction in patients with aphasia after stroke. J Neurol 258, 343–349 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5868-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5868-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation