Skip to main content
Log in

Nichtkleinzellige Lungenkarzinome

Subklassifikation und prädiktive molekulare Markeruntersuchungen in der Zytologie

Non-small cell lung cancer

Subtyping and predictive molecular marker investigations in cytology

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In der Lungenkarzinomdiagnostik haben sich die Anforderungen an die Zytologie in den letzen Jahren deutlich verändert. Eine exakte Subtypisierung nichtkleinzelliger Lungenkarzinome (NSCLC) in Adeno- und Plattenepithelkarzinome entscheidet sowohl über die Wahl der Chemotherapie als auch über prädiktive Markeruntersuchungen für eine eventuelle zielgerichtete Therapie. In den meisten Fällen gelingt die Subtypisierung rein morphologisch aufgrund etablierter Kriterien und kann durch immunzytochemische Untersuchungen unterstützt werden. Zytologische Präparate müssen auch danach beurteilt werden, ob das Material für notwendige molekulare Markeranalysen ausreicht. Die Zytologie ist für prädiktive Markeranalysen genau so gut geeignet wie bioptisches Material. Gleichzeitig vorhandene Zytologien und Biopsien sollten sowohl für die Angabe des NSCLC-Subtyps als auch für die Entscheidung, welches Material für prädiktive Markeranalysen besser geeignet ist, miteinander verglichen werden. In diesem Übersichtsartikel diskutieren wir spezifische Aspekte der NSCLC-Subtypisierung und derzeit empfohlene prädiktive Markeranalysen.

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been revolutionized over the last few years. Requirements for cytopathologists in lung cancer diagnosis have therefore changed. The general diagnostic category of NSLC is no longer sufficient. In addition cytological specimens need to be evaluated for adequacy regarding predictive marker analyses. Accurate NSCLC subtyping with a distinction of adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma is crucial for treatment decisions as the subtype will decide on the chemotherapy regimen and the choice of predictive marker analyses for targeted treatment. In the majority of cases, the subtype can be diagnosed by morphology alone. Cytology is equally well suited as biopsy specimens for the assessment of molecular predictive markers. The best results are achieved when both cytology and biopsy specimens are compared to choose the most appropriate specimen for morphological subtyping and molecular testing. In this paper, we discuss special issues of NSCLC subtyping and currently recommended predictive molecular marker analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Bubendorf L, Savic S (2009) Predictive EGFR gene analyses in cytology. Pathologe 30(Suppl 2):136–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Camidge DR, Kono SA, Flacco A et al (2010) Optimizing the detection of lung cancer patients harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements potentially suitable for ALK inhibitor treatment. Clin Cancer Res 16:5581–5590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF et al (2004) Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:2184–2191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwak EL, Bang YH, Camidge DR et al (2010) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:1693–1703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mcleer-Florin A, Moro-Sibilot D, Melis A et al (2012) Dual IHC and FISH testing for ALK gene rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas in a routine practice: a French study. J Thorac Oncol 7:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyerson M, Gabriel S, Getz G (2010) Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 11:685–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 361:947–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicholson AG, Gonzalez D, Shah P et al (2010) Refining the diagnosis and EGFR status of non-small cell lung carcinoma in biopsy and cytologic material, using a panel of mucin staining, TTF-1, cytokeratin 5/6, and P63, and EGFR mutation analysis. J Thorac Oncol 5:436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pao W, Girard N (2011) New driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol 12:175–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pirker R, Herth FJ, Kerr KM et al (2010) Consensus for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer: results from a European workshop. J Thorac Oncol 5:1706–1713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rekhtman N, Brandt SM, Sigel CS et al (2011) Suitability of thoracic cytology for new therapeutic paradigms in non-small cell lung carcinoma: high accuracy of tumor subtyping and feasibility of EGFR and KRAS molecular testing. J Thorac Oncol 6:451–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sasaki T, Rodig SJ, Chirieac LR et al (2010) The biology and treatment of EML4-ALK non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 46:1773–1780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Savic S, Tapia C, Grilli B et al (2008) Comprehensive epidermal growth factor receptor gene analysis from cytological specimens of non-small-cell lung cancers. Br J Cancer 98:154–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scagliotti G, Brodowicz T, Shepherd FA et al (2011) Treatment-by-histology interaction analyses in three phase III trials show superiority of pemetrexed in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6:64–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sigel CS, Moreira AL, Travis WD et al (2011) Subtyping of non-small cell lung carcinoma: a comparison of small biopsy and cytology specimens. J Thorac Oncol 6:1849–1856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M et al (2007) Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature 448:561–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu M, Szporn AH, Zhang D et al (2005) Cytology applications of p63 and TTF-1 immunostaining in differential diagnosis of lung cancers. Diagn Cytopathol 33:223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zusman-Harach SB, Harach HR, Gibbs AR (1991) Cytological features of non-small cell carcinomas of the lung in fine needle aspirates. J Clin Pathol 44:997–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Dr. S. Savic hat Vortragshonorare von Abbott Mol. erhalten und ist involviert in einem von Abbott Mol. finanzierten Forschungsprojekt.

Prof. L. Bubendorf hat an „Advisory-Board“-Meetings von Abbott Mol., Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche und Eli Lilly teilgenommen, Vortragshonorare von Abbott Mol., Pfizer, Astra Zeneca und Eli Lilly sowie finanzielle Forschungsunterstützung durch Abbott Mol. erhalten.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Savic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savic, S., Bihl, M. & Bubendorf, L. Nichtkleinzellige Lungenkarzinome. Pathologe 33, 301–307 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-012-1577-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-012-1577-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation