Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Who are the restrained and secluded patients: a 15-year nationwide study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To find interventions for reducing the use of restraint and seclusion, it is necessary to identify who the restrained and secluded patients are. The aim of the present study was to determine which demographic and clinical groups of psychiatric inpatients are at risk of being restrained/secluded, and whether there have been changes in the restrained/secluded patients’ profiles over a 15-year period in Finland.

Method

A structured postal survey concerning the demographic and clinical information of restrained/secluded patients was completed in all Finnish psychiatric hospitals during a predetermined week in 1990, 1991, 1994, 1998, and 2004. The National Hospital Discharge Register was used to gather information on all psychiatric inpatients during the study weeks.

Results

Out of the variables studied (age, gender, main diagnosis, phase of hospital stay), only the main diagnosis and the phase of hospital stay were independent risk factors for restraint/seclusion, and remained constant over time. The age profile of the restrained/secluded patients was unstable over time and the risk of being restrained/secluded was not associated with gender.

Conclusion

Restraint and seclusion is used mainly among the acute and the most disturbed patients. Therefore, in order to reduce the use of restraint and seclusion, resources should be targeted especially to these groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abderhalden C, Needham I, Dassen T, Halfens R, Haug HJ, Fischer JE (2008) Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 193:44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Betemps EJ, Somoza E, Buncher CR (1993) Hospital characteristics, diagnoses, and staff reasons associated with use of seclusion and restraint. Hosp Community Psychiatry 44:367–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bindman J, Reid Y, Szmukler G, Tiller J, Thornicroft G, Leese M (2005) Perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospital and engagement with follow-up—a cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:160–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JS, Tooke SK (1992) On the seclusion of psychiatric patients. Soc Sci Med 35:711–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter MD, Hannon VR, McCleery G, Wanderling JA (1988) Ethnic differences in seclusion and restraint. J Nerv Ment Dis 176:726–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crenshaw WB, Cain KA, Francis PS (1997) An updated national survey on seclusion and restraint. Psychiatr Serv 48:395–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Badri SM, Mellsop G (2002) A study of the use of seclusion in an acute psychiatric service. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 36:399–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forquer SL, Earle KA, Way BB, Banks SM (1996) Predictors of the use of restraint and seclusion in public psychiatric hospitals. Adm Policy Ment Health 23:527–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaskin CJ, Elsom SJ, Happell B (2007) Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities: review of the literature. Br J Psychiatry 191:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hammill K (1987) Seclusion: inside looking out. Nurs Times 83:38–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris GT, Rice ME (1997) Risk appraisal and management of violent behavior. Psychiatr Serv 48:1168–1176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Isohanni M, Mäkikyrö T, Moring J, Räsänen P, Hakko H, Partanen U, Koiranen M, Jones P (1997) A comparison of clinical and research DSM-III-R diagnoses of schizophrenia in a Finnish national birth cohort. Clinical and research diagnoses of schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 32:303–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaltiala-Heino R, Korkeila J, Tuohimäki C, Tuori T, Lehtinen V (2000) Coercion and restrictions in psychiatric inpatient treatment. Eur Psychiatry 15:213–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto AM, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2007) A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:747–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirkpatrick H (1989) A descriptive study of seclusion: the unit environment, patient behavior, and nursing interventions. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 3:3–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Legris J, Walters M, Browne G (1999) The impact of seclusion on the treatment outcomes of psychotic inpatients. J Adv Nurs 30:448–459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mason T (1998) Gender differences in the use of seclusion. Med Sci Law 38:2–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pihlajamaa J, Suvisaari J, Henriksson M, Heila H, Karjalainen E, Koskela J, Cannon M, Lönnqvist J (2008) The validity of schizophrenia diagnosis in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: findings from a 10-year birth cohort sample. Nord J Psychiatry 62:198–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Salib E, Ahmed AG, Cope M (1998) Practice of seclusion: a five-year retrospective review in north Cheshire. Med Sci Law 38:321–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith GM, Davis RH, Bixler EO, Lin HM, Altenor A, Altenor RJ, Hardentstine BD, Kopchick GA (2005) Pennsylvania State Hospital system’s seclusion and restraint reduction program. Psychiatr Serv 56:1115–1122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinert T, Lepping P, Bernhardsgrutter R, Conca A, Hatling T, Janssen W, Keski-Valkama A, Mayoral F, Whittington R (2009) Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

  22. Steinert T, Martin V, Baur M, Bohnet U, Goebel R, Hermelink G, Kronstorfer R, Kuster W, Martinez-Funk B, Roser M, Schwink A, Voigtländer W (2007) Diagnosis-related frequency of compulsory measures in 10 German psychiatric hospitals and correlates with hospital characteristics. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42:140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tardiff K (1981) Emergency control measures for psychiatric inpatients. J Nerv Ment Dis 169:614–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson P (1986) The use of seclusion in psychiatric hospitals in the Newcastle area. Br J Psychiatry 149:471–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallsten T, Kjellin L, Lindström L (2006) Short-term outcome of inpatient psychiatric care—impact of coercion and treatment characteristics. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:975–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Way BB, Banks SM (1990) Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects. Hosp Community Psychiatry 41:75–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wynn R (2003) Staff’s attitudes to the use of restraint and seclusion in a Norwegian university psychiatric hospital. Nord J Psychiatry 57:453–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vanha Vaasa Hospital, PO Box 13, 65381, Vaasa, Finland

    Alice Keski-Valkama & Markku Eronen

  2. Kellokoski Hospital, 04500, Kellokoski, Finland

    Eila Sailas

  3. Tampere School of Public Health, Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland

    Anna-Maija Koivisto

  4. Department of Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder, National Institute for Health and Welfare, PO Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland

    Jouko Lönnqvist

  5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki, PO Box 9, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

    Jouko Lönnqvist

  6. Medical School, University of Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland

    Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino

  7. Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, 33531, Tampere, Finland

    Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino

Authors
  1. Alice Keski-Valkama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eila Sailas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markku Eronen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna-Maija Koivisto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jouko Lönnqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice Keski-Valkama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keski-Valkama, A., Sailas, E., Eronen, M. et al. Who are the restrained and secluded patients: a 15-year nationwide study. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 45, 1087–1093 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0150-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0150-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation