Zusammenfassung
Bei fortgeschrittenen Melanomen gelingt eine Diagnosestellung meist durch eine Untersuchung mit dem bloßen Auge, gefolgt von einer chirurgischen Exzision und einer histopathologischen Befundung. Im Rahmen von Screeninguntersuchungen zwecks einer Melanomfrüherkennung, insbesondere bei Patienten mit sehr vielen Nävi, geht es jedoch um die Differenzierung atypischer, aber benigner Nävi von In-situ-Melanomen oder initial invasiven Melanomen. In dieser Situation besteht ein Bedarf an zusätzlichen, nichtinvasiven Untersuchungstechnologien, die den Dermatologen bei der Entscheidung für oder gegen eine Exzisionsbiopsie unterstützen. Die Dermatoskopie konnte ihren Zusatznutzen in Metaanalysen bestätigen und ist seit vielen Jahren ein fester Bestandteil in der dermatologischen Diagnostik. Ergänzend können dynamische Veränderungen oder eine Neuentstehung von Pigmentmalen mithilfe der sequenziellen digitalen Dermatoskopie oder der (automatisierten) Ganzkörperfotografie erfasst werden und so sinnvoll zur Melanomfrüherkennung beitragen. Neben diesen etablierten Untersuchungstechniken sind in den letzten Jahren zahlreiche Medizinprodukte durch die amerikanischen und europäischen Behörden für die nichtinvasive Diagnostik kutaner Neoplasien zugelassen worden. Diese Geräte basieren dabei auf physikalischen Verfahren wie der konfokalen Laserscanmikroskopie, der Multispektralanalyse, der elektrischen Impedanzspektroskopie oder der Raman-Spektroskopie. Weitere Technologien befinden sich noch auf dem Sprung von einer bisher mehr experimentellen hin zu einer klinischen Anwendung. Diese Arbeit gibt einen Überblick über die verschiedenen Technologien und beleuchtet deren Indikation und Zusatznutzen für den anwendenden Dermatologen.
Abstract
The diagnosis of advanced cutaneous melanoma may easily be made by the unaided eye, followed by excisional biopsy and histopathological examination. However, in the setting of melanoma screening examinations in high-risk patients with many nevi, dermatologists are challenged with the differentiation of atypical but benign nevi and early invasive or in situ melanomas. In this situation, there is a real need for additional, noninvasive examination techniques that may serve as an aide to decide for or against an excisional biopsy. Conventional dermoscopy is a well-established examination procedure and an increase in sensitivity was confirmed by two independent meta-analyses. Moreover, dynamic changes or newly developed pigmented lesions may be detected by sequential digital dermoscopy or (automated) total body photography, respectively. Over the past years, a number of medicinal products gained market access after licensing by American and European agencies for the noninvasive diagnosis of cutaneous neoplasms. These devices are based on technologies including in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy, multispectral analysis, electrical impedance spectroscopy, or Raman spectroscopy. Other technologies are still on the verge of becoming less experimental but more clinically applicable for diagnosing melanoma (in vivo multiphoton tomography, stepwise two-photon laser spectroscopy, infrared thermal image analysis, epidermal genetic information retrieval). This review provides a concise overview of general principles and sheds light on indication and added value for dermatologists.
Literatur
Nikolaou V, Stratigos AJ (2014) Emerging trends in the epidemiology of melanoma. Br J Dermatol 170:11–19
Katalinic A, Waldmann A, Weinstock MA et al (2012) Does skin cancer screening save lives?: An observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening. Cancer 118:5395–5402
Katalinic A, Eisemann N, Waldmann A (2015) Skin cancer screening in Germany. Documenting melanoma incidence and mortality from 2008 to 2013. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112:629–634
Stang A, Jockel KH (2016) Does skin cancer screening save lives? A detailed analysis of mortality time trends in Schleswig-Holstein and Germany. Cancer 122:432–437
Herman C (2012) Emerging technologies for the detection of melanoma: Achieving better outcomes. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 5:195–212
Argenziano G, Giacomel J, Zalaudek I et al (2013) A clinico-dermoscopic approach for skin cancer screening: Recommendations involving a survey of the International Dermoscopy Society. Dermatol Clin 31:525–534 (vii)
venuto-Andrade C, Dusza SW, Agero AL et al (2007) Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions. Arch Dermatol 143:329–338
Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P et al (2001) Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol 137:1343–1350
Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE et al (2008) Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: A meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 159:669–676
Pehamberger H, Steiner A, Wolff K (1987) In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 17:571–583
Nachbar F, Stolz W, Merkle T et al (1994) The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:551–559
Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P et al (1998) Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7‑point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol 134:1563–1570
Menzies SW, Ingvar C, Crotty KA et al (1996) Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features. Arch Dermatol 132:1178–1182
Carli P, Giorgi V De, Crocetti E et al (2004) Improvement of malignant/benign ratio in excised melanocytic lesions in the „dermoscopy era“: A retrospective study 1997–2001. Br J Dermatol 150:687–692
Carli P, Giorgie V De, Chiarugi A et al (2004) Addition of dermoscopy to conventional naked-eye examination in melanoma screening: A randomized study. J Am Acad Dermatol 50:683–689
Piccolo D, Ferrari A, Peris K et al (2002) Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: A comparative study. Br J Dermatol 147:481–486
Carli P, Massi D, Giorgie V De et al (2002) Clinically and dermoscopically featureless melanoma: When prevention fails. J Am Acad Dermatol 46:957–959
Haenssle HA, Vente C, Bertsch HP et al (2004) Results of a surveillance programme for patients at high risk of malignant melanoma using digital and conventional dermoscopy. Eur J Cancer Prev 13:133–138
Haenssle HA, Krueger U, Vente C et al (2006) Results from an observational trial: Digital epiluminescence microscopy follow-up of atypical nevi increases the sensitivity and the chance of success of conventional dermoscopy in detecting melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 126:980–985
Kittler H, Guitera P, Riedl E et al (2006) Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging. Arch Dermatol 142:1113–1119
Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M et al (2001) Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol 137:1583–1589
Altamura D, Avramidis M, Menzies SW (2008) Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol 144:502–506
Bauer J, Blum A, Strohhacker U et al (2005) Surveillance of patients at high risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma using digital dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol 152:87–92
Haenssle HA, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C et al (2010) Selection of patients for long-term surveillance with digital dermoscopy by assessment of melanoma risk factors. Arch Dermatol 146:257–264
Robinson JK, Nickoloff BJ (2004) Digital epiluminescence microscopy monitoring of high-risk patients. Arch Dermatol 140:49–56
Haenssle HA, Mograby N, Ngassa A et al (2016) Association of patient risk factors and frequency of nevus-associated cutaneous melanomas. JAMA Dermatol 152:291–298
Braun RP, Lemonnier E, Guillod J et al (1998) Two types of pattern modification detected on the follow-up of benign melanocytic skin lesions by digitized epiluminescence microscopy. Melanoma Res 8:431–437
Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Landthaler M et al (2003) Long-term dermoscopic follow-up of melanocytic naevi: Clinical outcome and patient compliance. Br J Dermatol 149:79–86
Salerni G, Teran T, Puig S et al (2013) Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: A study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 27:805–814
Feit NE, Dusza SW, Marghoob AA (2004) Melanomas detected with the aid of total cutaneous photography. Br J Dermatol 150:706–714
Salerni G, Carrera C, Lovatto L et al (2012) Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy („two-step method of digital follow-up“) in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 67:e17–e27
Banky JP, Kelly JW, English DR et al (2005) Incidence of new and changed nevi and melanomas detected using baseline images and dermoscopy in patients at high risk for melanoma. Arch Dermatol 141:998–1006
Risser J, Pressley Z, Veledar E et al (2007) The impact of total body photography on biopsy rate in patients from a pigmented lesion clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol 57:428–434
Ulrich M, Lange-Asschenfeldt S, Gonzalez S (2012) Clinical applicability of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy in dermatology. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 147:171–178
Gerger A, Koller S, Kern T et al (2005) Diagnostic applicability of in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy in melanocytic skin tumors. J Investig Dermatol 124:493–498
Gerger A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Langsenlehner U et al (2008) In vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy of melanocytic skin tumours: Diagnostic applicability using unselected tumour images. Br J Dermatol 158:329–333
Marghoob AA, Charles CA, Busam KJ et al (2005) In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of a series of congenital melanocytic nevi suggestive of having developed malignant melanoma. Arch Dermatol 141:1401–1412
Scope A, venuto-Andrade C, Agero AL et al (2007) In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy imaging of melanocytic skin lesions: Consensus terminology glossary and illustrative images. J Am Acad Dermatol 57:644–658
Guitera P, Menzies SW, Longo C et al (2012) In vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma using a two-step method: Analysis of 710 consecutive clinically equivocal cases. J Invest Dermatol 132:2386–2394
Pellacani G, Cesinaro AM, Seidenari S (2005) Reflectance-mode confocal microscopy of pigmented skin lesions – improvement in melanoma diagnostic specificity. J Am Acad Dermatol 53:979–985
Pellacani G, Pepe P, Casari A et al (2014) Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second-level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: A longitudinal prospective study. Br J Dermatol 171:1044–1051
Segura S, Puig S, Carrera C et al (2009) Development of a two-step method for the diagnosis of melanoma by reflectance confocal microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 61:216–229
Elbaum M, Kopf AW, Rabinovitz HS et al (2001) Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: A feasibility study. J Am Acad Dermatol 44:207–218
Monheit G, Cognetta AB, Ferris L et al (2011) The performance of MelaFind: A prospective multicenter study. Arch Dermatol 147:188–194
Winkelmann RR, Nikolaidis G, Rigel DS et al (2015) Comparison of the distribution of morphological disorganization of pigmented lesions in a community-based practice versus a university-based clinical setting as measured by a multispectral digital skin lesion analysis device: Impact on diagnosis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 8:16–18
Birgersson U, Birgersson E, Aberg P et al (2011) Non-invasive bioimpedance of intact skin: Mathematical modeling and experiments. Physiol Meas 32:1–18
Lui H, Zhao J, McLean D et al (2012) Real-time Raman spectroscopy for in vivo skin cancer diagnosis. Cancer Res 72:2491–2500
Gerami P, Alsobrook JP, Palmer TJ et al (2014) Development of a novel noninvasive adhesive patch test for the evaluation of pigmented lesions of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 71:237–244
Wachsman W, Morhenn V, Palmer T et al (2011) Noninvasive genomic detection of melanoma. Br J Dermatol 164:797–806
Herman C, Cetingul MP (2011) Quantitative visualization and detection of skin cancer using dynamic thermal imaging. J Vis Exp 51:e2679, doi:10.3791/2679
Bonmarin M, Gal FA Le (2014) Lock-in thermal imaging for the early-stage detection of cutaneous melanoma: A feasibility study. Comput Biol Med 47:36–43
Eichhorn R, Wessler G, Scholz M et al (2009) Early diagnosis of melanotic melanoma based on laser-induced melanin fluorescence. J Biomed Opt 14:034033
Leupold D, Scholz M, Stankovic G et al (2011) The stepwise two-photon excited melanin fluorescence is a unique diagnostic tool for the detection of malignant transformation in melanocytes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 24:438–445
Scholz M, Stankovic G, Scholz C et al (2012) En route to a new in vivo diagnostic of malignant pigmented melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 25:281–283
Dimitrow E, Ziemer M, Koehler MJ et al (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of multiphoton laser tomography for in vivo and ex vivo diagnosis of malignant melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 129:1752–1758
Seidenari S, Arginelli F, Dunsby C et al (2013) Multiphoton laser tomography and fluorescence lifetime imaging of melanoma: Morphologic features and quantitative data for sensitive and specific non-invasive diagnostics. PLoS ONE 8:e70682
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
H.A. Haenssle hat als Berater der Firma SciBase AB Honorare erhalten. H.A. Haenssle und C. Fink sind als Studienärzte an der Durchführung einer multizentrischen Studie zur klinischen Prüfung des Magnosco Dermatofluoroskops (Magnosco DFC 1) beteiligt.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fink, C., Haenssle, H.A. Strategien zur nichtinvasiven Diagnostik des Melanoms. Hautarzt 67, 519–528 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-016-3796-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-016-3796-0