Skip to main content
Log in

Komplikationen bei Eingriffen am Fettgewebe

Complications of liposuction

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Liposuktion ist der am häufigsten operativ ästhetische Eingriff weltweit zur Fettgewebsreduktion und Lipödembehandlung mit steigender Tendenz. Allein in den USA wurden 2010 über 200.000 Eingriffe durchgeführt. Neben rein ästhetischen Indikationen eignet sich die Liposuktion auch zur Behandlung benigner Fettgewebserkrankungen. Es handelt sich hierbei nicht um einen einfachen Eingriff. Vielmehr erfordert die Liposuktionschirurgie umfangreiche Kenntnisse und viel Erfahrung, ansonsten drohen irreversible medizinische oder ästhetische Komplikationen. In der Literatur lassen sich vereinzelt schwerwiegende Komplikationen wie nekrotisierende Fasziitis, „toxic shock syndrome“, Hämorrhagien, Perforation der Bauchorgane und pulmonale Embolien sogar mit Todesfolge finden, die vor allem auf unzureichende Hygienemaßnahmen, Auswahl des falschen Patientenkollektives, Verwendung zu großer Mengen der Tumeszenzlokalanästhesie bei Megaliposuktionen und unzureichende postoperative Überwachung zurückzuführen sind. Die Komplikationsrate ist dabei meist mit der mangelnden medizinischen Erfahrung und technischen Defiziten assoziiert.

Abstract

Liposuction is the most frequent aesthetic procedure worldwide for adipose tissue reduction and treatment of lipedema. It is being employed with increasing frequency. In 2010, in the USA more than 200.000 liposuctions were performed. Apart from aesthetic indications, liposuction also is suitable for treatment of benign adipose tissue diseases. This intervention is not a simple procedure but requires extensive knowledge and experience to prevent irreversible medical or aesthetic complications. Severe complications including necrotizing fasciitis, toxic shock syndrome, hemorrhage, perforation of inner organs und pulmonary embolism – some even with lethal outcome – occasionally have been reported. These complications were mostly due to inadequate hygiene measures, inappropriate patient selection, use of excessive local anesthesia during mega-liposuction (tumescent technique) and inadequate post-operative surveillance. The complication rate usually reflects a lack of medical experience as well as technical inadequacies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery (2003) 2003 Guidelines for Lipo-Suction Surgery. Am J Cos Surg 20(1):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asken S (1988) Liposuction Surgery and autologous fat transplantation. Appelton & Lange, East Norwalk

  3. Butterwick KJ, Goldman MP, Sriprachya-Anunt S (1999) Lidocaine levels during the first two hours of infiltration of dilute anesthetic solution for tumescent liposuction: rapid versus slow delivery. Dermatol Surg 25:681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi CW, Kim BJ, Moon SE et al (2007) Treatment of lipomas assisted with tumescent liposuction. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21(2):243–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman AJ et al (2009) Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:482–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Jong RH, Grazer FM (1999) Tumescent liposuction alert: death from lidocain cardiotoxicity. Am J Forensic Path 20:101

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Jong RH, Grazer FM (2001) Perioperative management of cosmetic liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamantis S et al (2006) Subcutaneous fat necrosis in a newborn following icebag application for treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. J Perinatol 26:518–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer A, Fischer G (1977) Revised technique for cellulitis fat reduction in riding breeches deformity. Bull Int Acad Cosmet Surg 2:40–41

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fournier P (1987) Body sculpturing through syringe liposuction and autologous fat re-injection. Samuel Rolf International, Corona Del Mar

  11. Grazer FM, De Jong RH (2000) Fatal outcomes from liposuction: census survey of cosmetic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:436–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanke CW, Coleman WP 3rd (1999) Morbidity and mortality related to liposuction. Questions and answers. Dermatol Clin 17:899–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Illouz Y (1983) Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 72:511–524

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klein JA (1987) The tumescent technique for liposuction surgery. Am J Cosmet Surg 4:236–267

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klein JA (1988) Anesthesia for liposuction in dermatologic surgery. J Dermatol Sur Oncol 14:1124–1132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 16:248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein JA (1993) Tumescent technique for local anesthesia improves safety in large volume liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:1085–1098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein JA (1999) Discussion: lidocaine is not necessary in liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1903–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein JA (1999) Anesthetic formulation of tumescent solutions. Dermatol Clin 17:751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehnhardt M et al (2003) No problem with liposuction? Chirurg 74(9):808–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lehnhardt M et al (2008) Major and lethal complications of liposuction: a review of 72 cases in Germany between 1998 and 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(6):396–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Manstein D, Laubach H, Watanabe K et al (2008) Selective cryolysis: a novel method of non invasive fat removal. Lasers Surg Med 40:595–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Orentreich DS (1998) Subcision. In: Klein AW (Hrsg) Tissue augmentation in clinical practice. Marcel Dekker, New York, S 173–190

  24. Platt MS, Kohler LJ, Ruiz R et al (2002) Death associated with liposuction: case reports and review of the literature. J Forensic Sci 47:205–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sattler G, Sommer B (1997) Liporecycling: immediate and delayed. Am J Cosm Surg 14:311–316

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sattler G, Hasche E, Rapprich S et al (1997) Neue operative Behandlungsmöglichkeiten bei benignen Fettgewebserkrankungen. Zeitschrift H + G 8:579–582

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sattler G, Sommer B (1999) Tumescent liposuction in Germany: history and new trends and techniques. Dermatol Surg 25:221–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sattler G, Sommer B (2001) Liporecycling: a technique for facial rejuvenation and body contouring. Dermatol Surg 26:1140–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sattler G (2002) DGÄC Leitlinien zur Liposuction. Magazin Ästhet Chir 3:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sattler G, Sommer B, Hanke CW (2003) Lehrbuch der Liposuktion. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 213

  31. Sattler G (2008) Liposuction. In: Rusciani L, Robins P (Hrsg) Textbook of dermatologic surgery, Bd 2, Italy. Padova, Piccin Nuova Libraria S.p.A., S 793–806

  32. Saylan Z (2001) Liposhifting instead of lipofilling: treatment of postlipoplasty irregularities. Aesthetic Surg J 21(2):137–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schuller-Petrovic S (1997) Improving the aesthetic aspect of soft tissue defects on the face using autologous fat transplantation. Facial Plast Surgery 13:119–124, 26:1159–1166

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sommer B, Sattler G (2000) Current concepts of fat graft survival: histology of aspirated adipose tissue and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg 26(12):1159–1166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stebbins WG, Hanke CW, Petersen J (2011) Novel method of minimally invasiveremoval of large lipoma after laser lipolysis with 980 nm diode laser. Dermatol Ther 24(1):125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Talmor M, Hoffmann LA, Liebermann M (1997) Intestinal perforation after suction lipoplasty: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 38:169–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Teimourian B, Rogers WB (1989) A national survey of complications associated with suction lipectomy: a comperative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:628

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wosnitza M et al (2007) Plasticity of human adipose stem cells to perform adipogenic and endothelial differentiation. Differentiation 75(1):12–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoho RA, Romaine JJ, O’Neil D (2005) Review of the liposuction, abdominoplasty and face-lift mortality and morbidity risk literature. Dermatol Surg 31:733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seinen Koautor an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Sattler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sattler, G., Eichner, S. Komplikationen bei Eingriffen am Fettgewebe. Hautarzt 64, 171–179 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-012-2487-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-012-2487-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation