Skip to main content
Log in

Chirurgie bei neuroendokrinen Neoplasien des Pankreas: State of the Art

Surgery of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: state of the art

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Die Chirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Pankreatische neuroendokrine Neoplasien (pNEN) werden mit zunehmender Inzidenz verzeichnet und vermehrt in frühen (resektablen) Stadien diagnostiziert. Aufgrund der Seltenheit dieser Neoplasien beruhen die Empfehlungen der verfügbaren Leitlinien vor allem auf retrospektiven Daten. Die onkologische und chirurgische Therapie dieser seltenen Erkrankung sollte spezialisierten Zentren vorbehalten sein. Bei resektablem Befund ohne Hinweis auf diffuse Filialisierung ist die kurativ intendierte vollständige Entfernung anzustreben. Alternativ zur chirurgischen Resektion wurde bei kleinen nichtfunktionellen Tumoren < 2 cm die Watch-and-wait-Strategie empfohlen, neuere Daten zeigen jedoch ein längeres Überleben nach Resektion von Neoplasien in der Größe zwischen 1 und 2 cm. Für benigne Insulinome und nichtfunktionelle gut differenzierte kleine pNEN stehen parenchymsparende Verfahren wie die Enukleation oder die Segmentresektion zur Verfügung. Die Frage des Einflusses von Lymphknotenmetastasen auf das langfristige tumorfreie und Gesamtüberleben und damit der Stellenwert der systematischen Lymphadenektomie ist nicht abschließend geklärt. Bei Neoplasien > 2 cm ist eine formelle Resektion mit Lymphadenektomie anzustreben. Minimal-invasive und robotisch assistierte Verfahren haben einen zunehmenden Stellenwert auch bei formellen Resektionen.

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) have a rising incidence and are increasingly diagnosed at early and thus potentially resectable stages. Due to the rarity of these neoplasms the recommendations of currently available guidelines are mainly based on retrospective data. Surgical and oncological treatment of these rare diseases should only be performed at specialized centers. In cases of resectability without indications of diffuse metastases, complete resection with curative intent should be the treatment of choice. For small nonfunctional pNENs < 2 cm watch and wait strategies are recommended as an alternative to surgical treatment. Recent data, however, also showed an increased survival even of small (1–2 cm) pNENs after resection. For benign insulinomas and small nonfunctional well-differentiated pNENs parenchyma-sparing procedures, such as enucleation and segmental resection are available. The question of the influence of lymph node metastases on long-term disease-free survival and overall survival and consequently the role of systematic lymphadenectomy is still a matter of debate. In pNENs > 2 cm formal resection with lymphadenectomy is considered the gold standard. Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted procedures are of increasing importance also for formal pancreatic resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Assi HA, Mukherjee S, Kunz PL et al (2020) Surgery versus surveillance for well-differentiated, nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an 11-year analysis of the national cancer database. The Oncol 25:e276–e283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartsch DK, Waldmann J, Fendrich V et al (2012) Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after surgery for sporadic gastrinoma. Br J Surg 99:1234–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartsch DK, Albers M, Knoop R et al (2013) Enucleation and limited pancreatic resection provide long-term cure for insulinoma in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Neuroendocrinology 98:290–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beane JD, Borrebach JD, Billderback A et al (2021) Small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate? Am J Surg 222:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beger HG, Siech M, Poch B et al (2015) Limited surgery for benign tumours of the pancreas: a systematic review. World J Surg 39:1557–1566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS et al (2008) Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg 247:490–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Björnsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C et al (2020) Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 107:1281–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caplin ME, Pavel M, Ćwikła JB et al (2014) Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 371:224–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chivukula SV, Tierney JF, Hertl M et al (2020) Operative resection in early stage pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States: are we over- or undertreating patients? Surgery 167:180–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conrad C, Kutlu OC, Dasari A et al (2016) Prognostic value of lymph node status and extent of lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors confined to and extending beyond the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1966–1974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crippa S, Zerbi A, Boninsegna L et al (2012) Surgical management of insulinomas: short- and long-term outcomes after enucleations and pancreatic resections. Arch Surg 147:261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Curran T, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ et al (2015) Importance of lymph node involvement in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: impact on survival and implications for surgical resection. J Gastrointest Surg 19:152–160 (discussion 160)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H et al (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dedieu A, Rault A, Collet D et al (2011) Laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neoplasm. Surg Endosc 25:572–576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E et al (2012) ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 95:74–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Delle Fave G, O’toole D, Sundin A et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 103:119–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), Netzwerk Neuroendokrine Tumoren (NeT) e.V. (Patientenvertretung), Bundesorganisation Selbsthilfe NeuroEndokrine Tumoren e.V. (NET-sgh) (Patientenvertretung) et al (2018) Practice guideline neuroendocrine tumors—AWMF-Reg. 021–27. Z Gastroenterol 56:583–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Drymousis P, Raptis DA, Spalding D et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 16:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ei S, Mihaljevic AL, Kulu Y et al (2021) Enucleation for benign or borderline tumors of the pancreas: comparing open and minimally invasive surgery. HPB (Oxford) 23:921–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 103:153–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fendrich V, Bartsch DK (2017) Surgical therapy of sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias G1/G2. Visc Med 33:344–350

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fendrich V, Langer P, Waldmann J et al (2007) Management of sporadic and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gastrinomas. Br J Surg 94:1331–1341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Finkelstein P, Sharma R, Picado O et al (2017) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs): analysis of overall survival of nonsurgical management versus surgical resection. J Gastrointest Surg 21:855–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fischer L, Bergmann F, Schimmack S et al (2014) Outcome of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Br J Surg 101:1405–1412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fottner C, Ferrata M, Weber MM (2017) Hormone secreting gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (GEP-NEN): when to consider, how to diagnose? Rev Endocr Metab Disord 18:393–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gaujoux S, Partelli S, Maire F et al (2013) Observational study of natural history of small sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:4784–4789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M et al (2014) Impact of extent of surgery on survival in patients with small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3515–3521

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Guerrini GP, Lauretta A, Belluco C et al (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis. BMC Surg 17:105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S et al (2011) Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1197–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hackert T, Probst P, Knebel P et al (2018) Pylorus resection does not reduce delayed gastric emptying after partial pancreatoduodenectomy: a blinded randomized controlled trial (PROPP study, DRKS00004191). Ann Surg 267:1021–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hashim YM, Trinkaus KM, Linehan DC et al (2014) Regional lymphadenectomy is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Ann Surg 259:197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Heidsma CM, van Roessel S, van Dieren S et al (2021) International validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence after resection of grade 1 and 2 nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000518757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hill JS, Mcphee JT, Mcdade TP et al (2009) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the impact of surgical resection on survival. Cancer 115:741–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Howe JR, Cardona K, Fraker DL et al (2017) The surgical management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: consensus guidelines of the north American neuroendocrine tumor society. Pancreas 46:715–731

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Howe JR, Merchant NB, Conrad C et al (2020) The north American neuroendocrine tumor society consensus paper on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 49:1–33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Huttner FJ, Koessler-Ebs J, Hackert T et al (2015) Meta-analysis of surgical outcome after enucleation versus standard resection for pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 102:1026–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jutric Z, Grendar J, Hoen HM et al (2017) Regional metastatic behavior of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: impact of lymph node positivity on survival. Pancreas 46:898–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Keutgen XM, Nilubol N, Glanville J et al (2016) Resection of primary tumor site is associated with prolonged survival in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 159:311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klaiber U, Probst P, Huttner FJ et al (2020) Randomized trial of pylorus-preserving vs. pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: long-term morbidity and quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg 24:341–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Klotz R, Dorr-Harim C, Bruckner T et al (2021) Evaluation of robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy-study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial (EUROPA, DRKS00020407). Trials 22:40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Krampitz GW, Norton JA, Poultsides GA et al (2012) Lymph nodes and survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Arch Surg 147:820–827

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kuo EJ, Salem RR (2013) Population-level analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 2 cm or less in size. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2815–2821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lopez CL, Falconi M, Waldmann J et al (2013) Partial pancreaticoduodenectomy can provide cure for duodenal gastrinoma associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Ann Surg 257:308–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mack CE, Schimmack S, Hackert T (2021) Sporadische nicht-funktionelle pankreatische neuroendokrine Neoplasien. In: Kreis M, Bartsch DK, Lang H (Hrsg) Viszeral- und Allgemeinchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mehrabi A, Fischer L, Hafezi M et al (2014) A systematic review of localization, surgical treatment options, and outcome of insulinoma. Pancreas 43:675–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surgery 157:45–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC et al (2008) Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol 9:61–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Niederle B, Selberherr A, Bartsch DK et al (2021) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and the pancreas: diagnosis and treatment of functioning and non-functioning pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasia within the MEN1 syndrome—an international consensus statement. Neuroendocrinology 111:609–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Niessen A, Hackert T (2022) State-of-the-art surgery for pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(2):443–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02362-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nießen A, Schimmack S, Sandini M et al (2021) C‑reactive protein independently predicts survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Sci Rep 11:23768

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Norton JA, Fraker DL, Alexander HR et al (2006) Surgery increases survival in patients with gastrinoma. Ann Surg 244:410–419

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Partelli S, Bartsch DK, Capdevila J et al (2017) ENETS consensus guidelines for standard of care in neuroendocrine tumours: surgery for small intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 105:255–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Partelli S, Gaujoux S, Boninsegna L et al (2013) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node involvement in nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). JAMA Surg 148:932–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sandini M, Strobel O, Hank T et al (2020) Pre-operative dysglycemia is associated with decreased survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Surgery 167:575–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schimmack S, Svejda B, Lawrence B et al (2011) The diversity and commonalities of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:273–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Solorzano CC, Lee JE, Pisters PW et al (2001) Nonfunctioning islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas: survival results in a contemporary series of 163 patients. Surgery 130:1078–1085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Strobel O, Cherrez A, Hinz U et al (2015) Risk of pancreatic fistula after enucleation of pancreatic tumours. Br J Surg 102:1258–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Strosberg J, Kvols L (2010) Antiproliferative effect of somatostatin analogs in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol 16:2963–2970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL et al (2021) Systematic review and metaanalysis of lymph node metastases of resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 28:1614–1624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tierney JF, Chivukula SV, Wang X et al (2019) Resection of primary tumor may prolong survival in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 165:644–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fendrich V, Langer P, Waldmann J et al (2007) Management of sporadic and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gastrinomas. Br J Surg 94:1331–1341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Xiao W, Zhu J, Peng L et al (2018) The role of central pancreatectomy in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 20:896–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T et al (2011) Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 364:514–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang Z, Liu M, Ji S et al (2020) Prognostic value and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 49:381–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhao YP, Zhan HX, Zhang TP et al (2011) Surgical management of patients with insulinomas: result of 292 cases in a single institution. J Surg Oncol 103:169–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Hackert.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Nießen, S. Schimmack, F. Billmann und T. Hackert geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Redaktion

T. Hackert, Heidelberg

M.W. Büchler, Heidelberg

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nießen, A., Schimmack, S., Billmann, F. et al. Chirurgie bei neuroendokrinen Neoplasien des Pankreas: State of the Art. Chirurgie 93, 745–750 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01641-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01641-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation