Zusammenfassung
Pankreatische neuroendokrine Neoplasien (pNEN) werden mit zunehmender Inzidenz verzeichnet und vermehrt in frühen (resektablen) Stadien diagnostiziert. Aufgrund der Seltenheit dieser Neoplasien beruhen die Empfehlungen der verfügbaren Leitlinien vor allem auf retrospektiven Daten. Die onkologische und chirurgische Therapie dieser seltenen Erkrankung sollte spezialisierten Zentren vorbehalten sein. Bei resektablem Befund ohne Hinweis auf diffuse Filialisierung ist die kurativ intendierte vollständige Entfernung anzustreben. Alternativ zur chirurgischen Resektion wurde bei kleinen nichtfunktionellen Tumoren < 2 cm die Watch-and-wait-Strategie empfohlen, neuere Daten zeigen jedoch ein längeres Überleben nach Resektion von Neoplasien in der Größe zwischen 1 und 2 cm. Für benigne Insulinome und nichtfunktionelle gut differenzierte kleine pNEN stehen parenchymsparende Verfahren wie die Enukleation oder die Segmentresektion zur Verfügung. Die Frage des Einflusses von Lymphknotenmetastasen auf das langfristige tumorfreie und Gesamtüberleben und damit der Stellenwert der systematischen Lymphadenektomie ist nicht abschließend geklärt. Bei Neoplasien > 2 cm ist eine formelle Resektion mit Lymphadenektomie anzustreben. Minimal-invasive und robotisch assistierte Verfahren haben einen zunehmenden Stellenwert auch bei formellen Resektionen.
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) have a rising incidence and are increasingly diagnosed at early and thus potentially resectable stages. Due to the rarity of these neoplasms the recommendations of currently available guidelines are mainly based on retrospective data. Surgical and oncological treatment of these rare diseases should only be performed at specialized centers. In cases of resectability without indications of diffuse metastases, complete resection with curative intent should be the treatment of choice. For small nonfunctional pNENs < 2 cm watch and wait strategies are recommended as an alternative to surgical treatment. Recent data, however, also showed an increased survival even of small (1–2 cm) pNENs after resection. For benign insulinomas and small nonfunctional well-differentiated pNENs parenchyma-sparing procedures, such as enucleation and segmental resection are available. The question of the influence of lymph node metastases on long-term disease-free survival and overall survival and consequently the role of systematic lymphadenectomy is still a matter of debate. In pNENs > 2 cm formal resection with lymphadenectomy is considered the gold standard. Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted procedures are of increasing importance also for formal pancreatic resection.
Literatur
Assi HA, Mukherjee S, Kunz PL et al (2020) Surgery versus surveillance for well-differentiated, nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an 11-year analysis of the national cancer database. The Oncol 25:e276–e283
Bartsch DK, Waldmann J, Fendrich V et al (2012) Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after surgery for sporadic gastrinoma. Br J Surg 99:1234–1240
Bartsch DK, Albers M, Knoop R et al (2013) Enucleation and limited pancreatic resection provide long-term cure for insulinoma in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Neuroendocrinology 98:290–298
Beane JD, Borrebach JD, Billderback A et al (2021) Small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate? Am J Surg 222:29–34
Beger HG, Siech M, Poch B et al (2015) Limited surgery for benign tumours of the pancreas: a systematic review. World J Surg 39:1557–1566
Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS et al (2008) Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg 247:490–500
Björnsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C et al (2020) Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 107:1281–1288
Caplin ME, Pavel M, Ćwikła JB et al (2014) Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 371:224–233
Chivukula SV, Tierney JF, Hertl M et al (2020) Operative resection in early stage pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States: are we over- or undertreating patients? Surgery 167:180–186
Conrad C, Kutlu OC, Dasari A et al (2016) Prognostic value of lymph node status and extent of lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors confined to and extending beyond the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1966–1974
Crippa S, Zerbi A, Boninsegna L et al (2012) Surgical management of insulinomas: short- and long-term outcomes after enucleations and pancreatic resections. Arch Surg 147:261–266
Curran T, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ et al (2015) Importance of lymph node involvement in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: impact on survival and implications for surgical resection. J Gastrointest Surg 19:152–160 (discussion 160)
de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H et al (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2–9
Dedieu A, Rault A, Collet D et al (2011) Laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neoplasm. Surg Endosc 25:572–576
Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E et al (2012) ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 95:74–87
Delle Fave G, O’toole D, Sundin A et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 103:119–124
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), Netzwerk Neuroendokrine Tumoren (NeT) e.V. (Patientenvertretung), Bundesorganisation Selbsthilfe NeuroEndokrine Tumoren e.V. (NET-sgh) (Patientenvertretung) et al (2018) Practice guideline neuroendocrine tumors—AWMF-Reg. 021–27. Z Gastroenterol 56:583–681
Drymousis P, Raptis DA, Spalding D et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 16:397–406
Ei S, Mihaljevic AL, Kulu Y et al (2021) Enucleation for benign or borderline tumors of the pancreas: comparing open and minimally invasive surgery. HPB (Oxford) 23:921–926
Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology 103:153–171
Fendrich V, Bartsch DK (2017) Surgical therapy of sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias G1/G2. Visc Med 33:344–350
Fendrich V, Langer P, Waldmann J et al (2007) Management of sporadic and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gastrinomas. Br J Surg 94:1331–1341
Finkelstein P, Sharma R, Picado O et al (2017) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs): analysis of overall survival of nonsurgical management versus surgical resection. J Gastrointest Surg 21:855–866
Fischer L, Bergmann F, Schimmack S et al (2014) Outcome of surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Br J Surg 101:1405–1412
Fottner C, Ferrata M, Weber MM (2017) Hormone secreting gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (GEP-NEN): when to consider, how to diagnose? Rev Endocr Metab Disord 18:393–410
Gaujoux S, Partelli S, Maire F et al (2013) Observational study of natural history of small sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:4784–4789
Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M et al (2014) Impact of extent of surgery on survival in patients with small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3515–3521
Guerrini GP, Lauretta A, Belluco C et al (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis. BMC Surg 17:105
Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S et al (2011) Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:1197–1203
Hackert T, Probst P, Knebel P et al (2018) Pylorus resection does not reduce delayed gastric emptying after partial pancreatoduodenectomy: a blinded randomized controlled trial (PROPP study, DRKS00004191). Ann Surg 267:1021–1027
Hashim YM, Trinkaus KM, Linehan DC et al (2014) Regional lymphadenectomy is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Ann Surg 259:197–203
Heidsma CM, van Roessel S, van Dieren S et al (2021) International validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence after resection of grade 1 and 2 nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000518757
Hill JS, Mcphee JT, Mcdade TP et al (2009) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the impact of surgical resection on survival. Cancer 115:741–751
Howe JR, Cardona K, Fraker DL et al (2017) The surgical management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: consensus guidelines of the north American neuroendocrine tumor society. Pancreas 46:715–731
Howe JR, Merchant NB, Conrad C et al (2020) The north American neuroendocrine tumor society consensus paper on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 49:1–33
Huttner FJ, Koessler-Ebs J, Hackert T et al (2015) Meta-analysis of surgical outcome after enucleation versus standard resection for pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 102:1026–1036
Jutric Z, Grendar J, Hoen HM et al (2017) Regional metastatic behavior of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: impact of lymph node positivity on survival. Pancreas 46:898–903
Keutgen XM, Nilubol N, Glanville J et al (2016) Resection of primary tumor site is associated with prolonged survival in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 159:311–318
Klaiber U, Probst P, Huttner FJ et al (2020) Randomized trial of pylorus-preserving vs. pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: long-term morbidity and quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg 24:341–352
Klotz R, Dorr-Harim C, Bruckner T et al (2021) Evaluation of robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy-study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial (EUROPA, DRKS00020407). Trials 22:40
Krampitz GW, Norton JA, Poultsides GA et al (2012) Lymph nodes and survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Arch Surg 147:820–827
Kuo EJ, Salem RR (2013) Population-level analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 2 cm or less in size. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2815–2821
Lopez CL, Falconi M, Waldmann J et al (2013) Partial pancreaticoduodenectomy can provide cure for duodenal gastrinoma associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Ann Surg 257:308–314
Mack CE, Schimmack S, Hackert T (2021) Sporadische nicht-funktionelle pankreatische neuroendokrine Neoplasien. In: Kreis M, Bartsch DK, Lang H (Hrsg) Viszeral- und Allgemeinchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 1–14
Mehrabi A, Fischer L, Hafezi M et al (2014) A systematic review of localization, surgical treatment options, and outcome of insulinoma. Pancreas 43:675–686
Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surgery 157:45–55
Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC et al (2008) Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol 9:61–72
Niederle B, Selberherr A, Bartsch DK et al (2021) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and the pancreas: diagnosis and treatment of functioning and non-functioning pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasia within the MEN1 syndrome—an international consensus statement. Neuroendocrinology 111:609–630
Niessen A, Hackert T (2022) State-of-the-art surgery for pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(2):443–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02362-y
Nießen A, Schimmack S, Sandini M et al (2021) C‑reactive protein independently predicts survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Sci Rep 11:23768
Norton JA, Fraker DL, Alexander HR et al (2006) Surgery increases survival in patients with gastrinoma. Ann Surg 244:410–419
Partelli S, Bartsch DK, Capdevila J et al (2017) ENETS consensus guidelines for standard of care in neuroendocrine tumours: surgery for small intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Neuroendocrinology 105:255–265
Partelli S, Gaujoux S, Boninsegna L et al (2013) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node involvement in nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). JAMA Surg 148:932–939
Sandini M, Strobel O, Hank T et al (2020) Pre-operative dysglycemia is associated with decreased survival in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Surgery 167:575–580
Schimmack S, Svejda B, Lawrence B et al (2011) The diversity and commonalities of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:273–298
Solorzano CC, Lee JE, Pisters PW et al (2001) Nonfunctioning islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas: survival results in a contemporary series of 163 patients. Surgery 130:1078–1085
Strobel O, Cherrez A, Hinz U et al (2015) Risk of pancreatic fistula after enucleation of pancreatic tumours. Br J Surg 102:1258–1266
Strosberg J, Kvols L (2010) Antiproliferative effect of somatostatin analogs in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol 16:2963–2970
Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL et al (2021) Systematic review and metaanalysis of lymph node metastases of resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 28:1614–1624
Tierney JF, Chivukula SV, Wang X et al (2019) Resection of primary tumor may prolong survival in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 165:644–651
Fendrich V, Langer P, Waldmann J et al (2007) Management of sporadic and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gastrinomas. Br J Surg 94:1331–1341
Xiao W, Zhu J, Peng L et al (2018) The role of central pancreatectomy in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 20:896–904
Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T et al (2011) Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med 364:514–523
Zhang Z, Liu M, Ji S et al (2020) Prognostic value and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 49:381–386
Zhao YP, Zhan HX, Zhang TP et al (2011) Surgical management of patients with insulinomas: result of 292 cases in a single institution. J Surg Oncol 103:169–174
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
A. Nießen, S. Schimmack, F. Billmann und T. Hackert geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Additional information
Redaktion
T. Hackert, Heidelberg
M.W. Büchler, Heidelberg
QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nießen, A., Schimmack, S., Billmann, F. et al. Chirurgie bei neuroendokrinen Neoplasien des Pankreas: State of the Art. Chirurgie 93, 745–750 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01641-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-022-01641-8
Schlüsselwörter
- Neuroendokrine Tumoren
- Pankreatische Neoplasien
- Klinische Heterogenität
- Kurative Therapie
- Pankreaschirurgie