Skip to main content
Log in

Variationsbreite der Pankreatojejunostomie bei Pankreaskopfresektion

Range of variation of pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreatic head resection

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Insuffizienz der Pankreatojejunostomie bestimmt maßgeblich die Morbidität und Mortalität der Pankreaskopfresektion. Ursachen sind aggressiver Pankreassaft sowie das gehäufte Auftreten einer lokalen Pankreatitis durch Manipulation des Pankreas bei der Anastomosenanlage. Mit dem Ziel die Insuffizienzrate von bis zu 20 % zu minimieren, sind viele verschiedene Anastomosentechniken entwickelt worden. Ideal wäre eine einfache Anastomose, die unabhängig von der Weichheit des Pankreas und des Durchmessers des Pankreasgangs durchgeführt werden kann. Wir stellen drei Anastomosentechniken vor: die klassische Gang-zu-Mukosa-Pankreatojejunostomie (Cattell-Warren-Anastomose), die invaginierende Pankreatojejunostomie sowie die Blumgart-Anastomose. Anhand der verfügbaren Literatur werden die Vor- und Nachteile der einzelnen Anastomosentechniken erläutert. Die Blumgart-Anastomose sowie die invaginierende Pankreatojejunostomie scheinen der Cattell-Warren-Anastomose überlegen zu sein. Die Daten sind allerdings nicht direkt vergleichbar. Derzeit wird eine prospektiv randomisierte Studie zur Evaluation des Stellenwerts der Blumgart-Anastomose durchgeführt.

Abstract

Leakage of pancreaticojejunostomy basically determines the morbidity and mortality of pancreatic head resection. Aggressive pancreatic juice affects the integrity of the anastomosis and the occurrence of local pancreatitis is increased due to manipulation of the pancreas during creation of the anastomosis. A multitude of anastomotic techniques have been developed aimed at minimizing the leakage rate of up to 20%. Ideal would be a simple technique that can be carried out independently of the softness of the pancreas and the diameter of the pancreatic duct. We present three anastomotic techniques: the classical duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (Cattell-Warren anastomosis), the invagination pancreaticojejunostomy and the Blumgart anastomosis. Based on the available literature, the advantages and disadvantages of each technique are explained. The Blumgart anastomosis and the invagination pancreaticojejunostomy seem to be superior to the Cattell-Warren anastomosis; however, the available data cannot be directly compared. Currently, a prospective randomized study is being conducted to evaluate the importance of the Blumgart anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Søreide K, Labori KJ (2016) Risk factors and preventive strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery: a comprehensive review. Scand J Gastroenterol 51:1147–1154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugimoto M, Takahashi S, Kojima M, Gotohda N, Kato Y, Kawano S et al (2014) What is the nature of pancreatic consistency? Assessment of the elastic modulus of the pancreas and comparison with tactile sensation, histology, and occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 156:1204–1211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neychev VK, Saldinger PF, Sladinger PF (2014) Minimizing shear and compressive stress during pancreaticojejunostomy: rationale of a new technical modification. JAMA Surg 149:203–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Warren KW, Cattell RB (1956) Basic techniques in pancreatic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 36:707–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S et al (2009) Does Type of Pancreaticojejunostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Decrease Rate of Pancreatic Fistula? A Randomized, Prospective, Dual-Institution Trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hua J, He Z, Qian D, Meng H, Zhou B, Song Z, Pancreaticoduodenectomy D‑tVIPF (2015) a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1900–1909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai X, Zhang Q, Gao S, Lou J, Li G, Zhang Y et al (2016) Duct-to-Mucosa vs Invagination for Pancreaticojejunostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial from a Single Surgeon. J Am Coll Surg 222:10–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumgart’s Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas – 9781437714548 | US Elsevier Health Bookshop [Internet]. [zitiert 11. August 2016]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/blumgarts-surgery-of-the-liver-biliary-tract-and-pancreas-9781437714548.html

  9. Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, Albertsmeier M, Jauch K‑W, Bruns CJ (2009) Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 96:741–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN (2010) Novel Pancreaticojejunostomy with a Low Rate of Anastomotic Failure-Related Complications. J Am Coll Surg 210:54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Halloran CM, Platt K, Gerard A, Polydoros F, O’Reilly DA, Gomez D et al (2016) PANasta Trial; Cattell Warren versus Blumgart techniques of panreatico-jejunostomy following pancreato-duodenectomy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/17/1/30. Zugegriffen: 23. August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu F, Chen J, Geng W, Xie S, Zhao Y, Yu L et al (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. HPB 17:123–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hallet J, Zih FSW, Deobald RG, Scheer AS, Law CHL, Coburn NG et al (2015) The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB 17:113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, Klein F, Sick O, Niedergethmann M et al (2016) Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 263:440–449

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy EP, Brumbaugh J, Yeo CJ (2010) Reconstruction Following the Pylorus Preserving Whipple Resection: PJ, HJ, and DJ. J Gastrointest Surg 14:408–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng S, Mou Y, Cai X, Peng C (2002) Binding pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage. Am J Surg 183:283–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang B, Xu J, Liu C, Long J, Liu L, Xu Y et al (2013) Application of „papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated“ pancreaticojejunostomy for normal soft pancreas cases. Sci Rep 3:2068

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall RI, Rhodes M, Isabel-Martinez L, Kelleher J, Venables CW (1990) Pancreatic exocrine function after a sutureless pancreatico-jejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 77:83–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruns CJ, Popp FC (2016) Pyloruserhaltende Pankreaskopfresektion. Videobeitrag. Chirurg 87:298–307. doi:10.1007/s00104-016-0181-6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Bruns.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

F.C. Popp und C.J. Bruns geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Popp, F.C., Bruns, C.J. Variationsbreite der Pankreatojejunostomie bei Pankreaskopfresektion. Chirurg 88, 3–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0327-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0327-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation