Abstract
Background and aims: Health-related quality of life (HrQoL) is broadly accepted as an evaluation criterion of medical therapy effects. The major objectives of this work are a) measuring of the effects of rehabilitation therapy on the HrQoL of elderly patients after hip fracture, and b) study of discrepancies between the physician’s findings on one hand and subjective ratings of patients on the other, and their influence on HrQoL, depression, and independence in activities of daily living. Methods: The study sample consisted of 95 patients surgically treated after a fall-induced hip fracture (mean age=82 years; range=61–97). Using the median as splitting criterion, ratings of patients and physicians concerning disturbance-specific functional capacity were subdivided into positive and negative. This led to separation of the sample into four subgroups: the fortunate (congruent positive ratings), satisfaction paradox (positive subjective, negative objective ratings), dissatisfaction dilemma (negative subjective, objective positive ratings), and the unfortunate (congruent negative ratings). Results: The four patient sub-groups diverged in their estimations. The subgroups of the fortunate and satisfaction paradox have had the highest subjective gains in HrQoL. The subgroups of dissatisfaction dilemma and the unfortunate estimated their gains as similarly low on most of the tested scales. Conclusions: Results stress the importance of subjective factors in processes concerning therapy evaluations and their influence on HrQoL. The objective success of therapy is not of primary importance for the extent of the HrQoL, but subjective evaluation of it is.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bush EN, Haberman M, Donaldson G, Sullivan K. Quality of life of 125 adults surviving 6–18 years after bone marrow transplantation. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 479–90.
Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil 1995; 16: 51–74.
Richter J, Schwarz M, Eisemann M, Bauer B. Quality of life as an indicator for successful geriatric inpatient rehabilitation - a validation study of the “Vienna List”. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2003; 37: 265–76.
Minicuci N, Noale M, Bardage C, et al. Cross-national determinants of quality of life from six longitudinal studies on aging: the CLESA project. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003; 15: 187–202.
Mussell M, Bocker U, Nagel N, Singer MV. Predictors of disease- related concerns and other aspects of health-related quality of life in outpatients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 1273–80.
Dapueto JJ, Servente L, Francolino C, Hahn EA. Determinants of quality of life in patients with cancer. Cancer 2005; 103: 1072–81.
Groll S, Weidenhammer W, Schmidt A. Considerations on the use of the construct “quality of life” as a goal variable in clinical research. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1991; 80: 560–4.
WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organisation. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1403–9.
Kivinen P, Halonen P, Eronen M, Nisssinen A. Self-rated health, physician-rated health and associated factors among elderly men: the Finnish cohorts of the Seven Countries study. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 41–7.
Bowling A. Measuring Disease. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1995.
Woodend AK, Nair RC, Tang AS. Definition of life quality from a patient versus health care professional perspective. Int J Rehabil Res 1997; 20: 71–80.
Fayers MP, Machin D. Quality of life. Chichester: Wiley; 2000.
Myrtek M. Gesunde Kranke - kranke Gesunde. Psychophysiologie des Krankheitsverhaltens [The psychophysiology of illness behaviour]. Bern: Huber; 1998.
Filipp SH, Ferring D. Zur inhaltlichen Bestimmung und Erfassung von Lebensqualität im Umfeld schwerer körperlicher Erkrankungen [On the conceptualization and assessment of quality of life in the context of severe physical diseases]. Prax Klin Verhalt Reha 1991; 16: 274–83.
Kessler J, Markowitsch HJ, Denzler P. Mini-Mental-Status-Test (MMST). Deutschsprachige Fassung [German Version]. Weinheim: Beltz; 1990.
Fritz JM, Piva SR. Physical impairment index: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with acute low back pain. Spine 2003; 28: 1189–94.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation. The Barthel Index. In AGAST, Ed. Geriatrisches Basisassessment (2nd ed.). München: MMV Medizin Verlag, 1997: 21–9.
Zung WWK. The Depression Status Inventory. In CIPS, Ed. Internationale Skalen für Psychiatrie (3rd ed.). Weinheim: Beltz Test; 1986.
Kohlmann T, Raspe H. Der Funktionsfragebogen Hannover zur alltagsnahen Diagnostik der Funktionsbeeintraechtigung durch Rückenschmerzen (FFbH-R) [The Hanover functional ability questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 1996; 35: 1–8.
Oswald WD, Fleischmann UM. The Nuremberg geronto-psychological inventory. Nuernberg: Erlangen University; 1986.
Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1998.
McCall WV, Dunn A, Rosenquist PB. Quality of life and function after electroconvulsive therapy. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 185: 405–9.
Link RE, Su LM, Sullivan W, Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP. Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005; 173: 175–9.
Drapier S, Raoul S, Drapier D, et al. Only physical aspects of quality of life are significantly improved by bilateral subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 2005; 252: 583–8.
Cuthbertson BH, Scott J, Strachan M, Kilonzo M, Vale L. Quality of life before and after intensive care. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 332–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was presented at the 1st International Conference of the Psychological Society of Northern Greece “Quality of Life & Psychology” 3–5 December 2004, Thessaloniki, Greece
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papadopoulos, C., Jagsch, R., Griesser, B. et al. Health-related quality of life of patients with hip fracture before and after rehabilitation therapy: discrepancies between physicians’ findings and patients’ ratings. Aging Clin Exp Res 19, 125–131 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324678
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324678