Skip to main content
Log in

Bone diminution of osteoporotic females at different skeletal sites

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The bone mineral density (BMD) of the radius and spine was determined by photo absorptiometry in a large number of controls (radius: n=111; spine: n=85; age range: 50–79 years) and osteoporotic women (radius: n=98; spine n=140; age range: 50–79 years) with at least one “atraumatic” vertebral compression fracture. Compared to age-matched controls, the BMD of the osteoporotic women showed the following diminutions: sixth decade: radius:−9.1%; spine:−25%; femur: −33%; seventh decade: radius:−16%; spine: −19%; femur:−23%; eighth decade: radius: −21%; spine:−20%; femur:−24%. The BMD was significantly diminished at all sites in all decades but in contrast to the radius, the difference from controls was bigger in the spine and femur in the sixth decade than in the seventh and eighth decade. In the osteoporotic women there was a significant correlation between radius BMD and age (4=−0.56;P<0.01) but not between spine or femoral BMD and age. The femoral neck BMD was also determined in a subset group of female controls (n=68), patients with crush fractures of the spine without a fracture of the hip (n=46), and in patients with fractures of the proximal femur (n=21). There was no difference among these groups in mean age (64±7, range: 50–79 years). Patients with hip fracture and spine fracture showed bone diminution in all three regions that was significantly below controls (P<0.001). The Ward's triangle region was specially diminished (−35%) and as a consequence the neck BMD was low (−26%). Trochanteric density was lower (−25%) in spine fracture cases than in hip fracture (−16%). The difference between the two groups of osteoporotic women was significant (P<0.05). In the hip fractures cases, spine BMD was reduced only moderately compared to controls (−14%,P<0.01) and slightly elevated compared to spinal osteoporosis where the diminution was greater (−24%,P<0.001). Again, the difference between the two osteoporotic groups was significant (P<0.05). It appeared that spinal osteoporosis involved loss of bone from both the spine and hip, whereas femoral osteoporosis showed a preferential loss of bone from the femur neck region, and a lesser loss from the trochanter or the spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazess RB (1982) On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop Rel Res 162:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newton John HF, Morgan DB (1970) The loss of bone with age, osteoporosis and fractures. Clin Orthop 71:229–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher JC, Goldgar D, Moy A (1987) Total bone calcium in normal women: effect of age and menopause status. J Bone Min Res 2:491–496

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M, Johnston C, Dawson Hughes B, Baran D, Powell M, Notelowitz M (1987) Spine and femur density using dual photo absorptiometry in US white women. Bone Mineral 2:211–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pocok NA, Eberl S, Eisman JA, Yeates MG, Sambrook PN, Freund J, Duncan A, (1987) Dual photon bone densitometry in normal Australian women: a cross-sectional study. Med J Australia 146:293

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geusens P, Dequeker J, Verstraeten A, Niis J (1986) Age, sex, and menopause-related changes of vertebral and peripheral bone: population study with dual and single photon absorptiometry and radiogrammetry. J Nucl Med 27:1540–1549

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krølner B, Nielsen SP (1982) Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine in normal and osteoporotic women: crosssectional and longitudinal studies. Clin Sci 62:329–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mautalen C, Rubin Z, Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Fromm G (in press). Bone mineral density of spine and femur in normal women from Buenos Aires. Medicina (Buenos Aires)

  9. Mazess RB, Barden H, Ettinger M, Schultz E (1988) Bone density of the radius, spine and proximal femur in osteoporosis. J Bone Min Res 3:13–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton LJIII (1981) Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging. Relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 67:328–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Podenphant J, Herss Nielsen VA, Riis BJ, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C (1987) Bone mass, bone structure and vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients. Bone 8:127–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aloia JF, Vaswani A, Ellis K, Yven K, Cohn SH (1985) A model for involutional bone loss. J Lab Clin Med 106:630–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nilas L, Podenphant J, Riis BJ, Gotfredsen A (1987) Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm. J Nucl Med 28:960–965

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laval-Jeantet AM, Miravet L, Bergot C, De Vernejoul MC, Kuntz D, Laval-Jeantet M (1987) Tomodensitometrie vertebrale quantitave. Resultats sur 105 femmes consultant pour osteoporosis. J Radiol 68:495–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Heilbrun LK, Vogel JM (1987) Definition of a spine fracture threshold based upon prospective fracture risk. Bone 8:271–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mautalen C, Tau C, Casco C, Fromm G (1984) Contenido mineral óseo en la población normal de Buenos Aires. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 44:356–360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ott SM, Kilcoyne RF, Chesnut CHIII (1987) Ability of four different techniques of measuring bone mass to diagnose vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. J Bone Min Res 2:201–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mautalen C, Rommero H, Ghiringhelli G, Fromm G (1986) Cortical bone mineral content in primary hyperparathyroidism. Changes after parathyroidectomy. Acta Endocrinol 111:494–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazess RB (1987) Bone density in diagnosis of osteoporosis: thresholds and breakpoints Calcif Tissue Int 41:117–118

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mazess RB, Hanson J, Sorenson J, Barden HS (1988) Discrimination of osteoporosis using single photon (SPA) and dual photon absorptiometry (DPA). In: Dequeker J, Geusens P, Wahner H (eds) Bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry: methodological problems. Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schulz E, Libanatti C, Stook J, Kirk G, Baylink D (1986) Femoral neck bone mineral in hip-fractured females. Proc IV World Congr of Nuclear Medicine (abstract 208). Buenos Aires, pp 34–35

  22. Perloff JJ, McDermott MT, Perloff KG, Kidd GS (1988) Risk factors for osteoporotic hip fractures. J Bone Min Res 3(suppl 1): S87

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cummings SR (1985) Are patients with hip fractures more osteoporotic? Review of the evidence. Am J Med 78: 487–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Härmä M, Parviainen M, Koskinen T, Hoikka V, Alhava E (1987) Bone density, histomorphometry and biochemistry in patients with fractures of the hip or spine. Ann Clin Res 19:378–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314:1676–1686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, Wahner HW (1983) Heterogeneity of involutional osteoporosis: evidence for two distinct osteoporosis syndromes. In: Frame B, Potts JT (eds) Clinical disorders of bone and mineral metabolism. Excerpta Medica Int Congress, Amesterdam, series No 617, pp 337–342

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mautalen, C., Vega, E., Ghiringhelli, G. et al. Bone diminution of osteoporotic females at different skeletal sites. Calcif Tissue Int 46, 217–221 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554998

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554998

Key words

Navigation