Skip to main content

Pathohistological Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Malignant Mesothelioma

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 189))

Abstract

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare aggressive tumour arising from mesothelial cells of the pleural and peritoneal cavity including pericardium and tunica vaginalis testis. Malignant mesothelioma occurs predominantly in men (>90%). Asbestos exposure is the best known and evaluated risk factor with a long latency period between exposure and onset of malignant mesothelioma ranging from 15 to 60 years. Exposure to erionite leads to higher incidences of mesothelioma and play an important role in environmental exposure (Turkey). Other possible risk factors are radiation, recurrent pleuritis/peritonitis and simian virus 40 (SV 40).

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is most common, whereas malignant peritoneal mesothelioma accounts only for 6–10%. Infrequent sites of origin are the pericardium and tunica vaginalis in 1–2%.

Malignant mesothelioma shows either diffuse growth pattern or occurs as a localised tumour mass. Diffuse type represents an aggressive tumour with poor prognosis and is incurable in most cases.

According to the WHO classification, three histological subtypes are distinguished: epithelioid, sarcomatoid and biphasic malignant mesothelioma.

Rare variants are desmoplastic type, a subtype of sarcomatoid mesothelioma, undifferentiated type and deciduoid type. Epithelioid type is the most frequent one, but biphasic malignant mesothelioma occurs in 30%. Pure sarcomatoid or biphasic type is seen less frequently in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma than in its pleural counterpart.

Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma is a generally non-invasive mesothelioma with low malignant potential that arises mostly in females in the peritoneal cavity. Histological type is an important prognostic marker. Longest survival is seen in patients with epithelioid malignant mesothelioma. Sarcomatoid subtype has the worst prognosis.

Malignant mesothelioma shows macroscopical and microscopical similarities to benign lesions and other malignancies. Therefore, reactive mesothelial proliferations on the one hand and secondary tumours resembling mesothelial cells as well as benign or rare mesothelial tumours on the other hand have to be distinguished. Additional immunohistochemistry is essential in histopathological assessment using a marker panel of antibodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbruzzese JL, Abbruzzese MC, Hess KR, Raber MN, Lenzi R, Frost P (1994) Unknown primary carcinoma: natural history and prognostic factors in 657 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol 12:1272–1280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Addis B, Roche H (2009) Problems in mesothelioma diagnosis. Histopathology 54:55–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Achermann YIZ, Welch LS, Bromley CM et al (2003) Clinical presentation of peritoneal mesothelioma. Tumori 89:255–258

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen TC (2005) Recognition of histopathologic patterns of diffuse malignant mesothelioma in differential diagnosis of pleural biopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:1415–1420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Antman KH, Corson JM, Li FP, Greenberger J, Sytkowski A, Henson DE, Weinstein L (1983) Malignant mesothelioma following radiation exposure. J Clin Oncol 1:693–700

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antman K, Hassan R, Eisner M et al (2005) Update on malignant mesotheliomas. Oncology 19:1301–1309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Attanoos RL, Griffin A, Gibbs AR (2003) The use of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium. A novel use for desmin and comparative evaluation with epithelial membrane antigen, p53, platelet-derived growth factor-receptor, P-glycoprotein and Bcl-2. Histopathology 43:231–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnetson RJ, Burnett RA, Downie I et al (2006) Immunhistochemical analysis of peritoneal mesothelioma and primary and secondary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum: antibodies to estrogen and progesterone receptors are useful. Am J Clin Pathol 125:67–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassarova AV, Nesland JM, Davidson B (2006) D2-40 is not a specific marker for cells of mesothelial origin in serous effusions. Am J Surg Pathol 30:878–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Battifora H, McCaughey WTE (1995) Tumours of the serosal membranes. In: Atlas of tumour pathology. Third series. Fascicle 15. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beasley MB (2008) Immunohistochemistry of pulmonary and pleural neoplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1062–1072

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell DA, Scully RE (1990) Serous borderline tumours of the peritoneum. Am J Surg Pathol 14:230–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Biscotti CV, Hart WR (1992) Peritoneal serous micropapillomatosis of low malignant potential (serous borderline tumours of the peritoneum). Am J Surg Pathol 16:467–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bofetta P (2007) Epidemiology of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. Ann Oncol 18:985–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bridda A, Padoan I, Mencarelli R et al (2007) Peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. MedGenMed 9:32–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bürrig K, Pfitzer P, Hort W (1990) Well differentiated papillary mesothelioma of the peritoneum: a borderline mesothelioma: report of two cases and review of literature. Virchows Arch 417:443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Butnor KJ (2005) My approach to the diagnosis of mesothelial lesions. J Clin Pathol 59:564–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Butnor KJ, Sporn T, Hammar S et al (2001) Well differentiated papillary mesothelioma. Am Surg 25:1304–1309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Butnor KJ, Nicholson AG, Allred DC, Zander DS, Henderson DW, Barrios RB, Haque AK, Allen TC, Killen DE, Cagle PT (2006) Expression of renal cell carcinoma-associated markers erythropoietin, CD10, and renal cell carcinoma marker in diffuse malignant mesothelioma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:823–827

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cagle P, Churg A (2005) Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mesothelial proliferation on pleural biopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:1421–1427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cerruto CA, Brun EA, Chung D et al (2006) Prognostic significance of histomorphologic parameters in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1654–1661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chua TC, Yan TD, Morris DL (2009) Surgical biology for the clinician: peritoneal mesothelioma: current understanding and management. Can J Surg 52:59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Churg A, Roggli V, Galateau-Salle F, Cagle PT, Gibbs AR, Hasleton PS, Henderson DW, Vignaud JM, Inai K, Praet M, Ordonez NG, Hammar SP, Testa JR, Gazdar AF, Saracci R, Pugatch R (2004) Mesothelioma. In: Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC (eds) World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung, pleura, tymus and heart. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  24. Comin CE, Calogero S, Messerini L (2007) h-Caldesmon, calretinin, estrogen receptor, and BerEP-4: a useful combination of immunohistochemical markers for differentiating epitheloid peritoneal mesothelioma from serous papillary carcinoma of ovary. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1139–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Comperat E, Zhang F, Perrotin C, Molina T, Magdeleinat P, Marmey B, Régnard JF, Audouin J, Camilleri-Broët S (2005) Variable sensitivity and specificity of TTF-1 antibodies in lung metastatic adenocarcinoma of colorectal origin. Mod Pathol 18:1371–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Demirag F, Unsal E, Tastepe I (2007) Biphasic malignant mesothelioma cases with osseous differentiation and long survival: a review of the literature. Lung Cancer 57:233–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. De Pangher MV, Recchia L, Cafferata M et al (2010) Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a multicenter study on 81 cases. Ann Oncol 21(2):348–353, Epub 2009 Jul 27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Deraco M, Nonaka D, Baratti D et al (2006) Prognostic analysis of clinicopathological factors in 49 patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol 13:229–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Facchetti F, Lonardi S, Gentili F, Bercich L, Falchetti M, Tardanico R, Baronchelli C, Lucini L, Santin A, Murer B (2007) Claudin 4 identifies a wide spectrum of epithelial neoplasms and represents a very useful marker for carcinoma versus mesothelioma diagnosis in pleural and peritoneal biopsies and effusions. Virchows Arch 451:669–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Foster MR, Johnson JE, Olson SJ, Allred DC (2001) Immunohistochemical analysis of nuclear versus cyoplasmatic staining of WT1 in malignant mesotheliomas and primary pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125:1316–1320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gonzales-Moreno S, Yan H, Alcorn K et al (2002) Malignant transformation of benign cystic mesothelioma of the peritoneum. J Surg Oncol 79:234–251

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guinee DG, Allen TC (2007) Primary pleural neoplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1149–1157

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guinee DG, Allen TC (2008) Primary pleural neoplasia: entities other than diffuse malignant mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1149–1170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hammar Sp (2006) Macroscopic, histologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features of mesothelioma. Ultrastruct Pathol 30:3–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hassan R, Alexander R (2005) Nonpleural mesothelioma: mesothelioma of the peritoneum, tunica vaginalis and pericardium. Hemtol Oncol Clin North Am 19:1067–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoekstra AV, Riben MW, Frumovitz M et al (2005) Well differentiated papillary mesothelioma of the peritoneum: a pathohistological analysis and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 98:161–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hurllimann J (1994) Desmin and neural marker expression in mesothelial cells and mesotheliomas. Hum Pathol 25:753–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Husain AN, Colby TV, Ordonez NG, Krausz T, Borczuk A, Cagle PT, Chiriac LR, Churg A, Galateau-Salle F, Gibbs AR, Gown AM, Hammar SP, Litzky LA, Roggli VL, Travis WD, Wick MR (2009) Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:1317–1331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ikegami Y, Kawai N, Tozawa K et al (2008) Malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis related to asbestos. Int J Urol 15:560–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalof AN, Cooper K (2008) D2-40 immunohistochemistry – so far! Adv Anat Pathol 16:62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kannerstein M, Churg M (1977) Peritoneal mesothelioma. Hum Pathol 8:83–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kerrigan SA, Turnnir RT, Clement PB, Young RH, Churg A (2002) Diffuse malignant epithelial mesotheliomas of the peritoneum in woman: a clinicpathologic study of patients. Cancer 94:378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. King J, Thatcher N, Pickering C, Hasleton P (2006) Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical antibodies used to distinguish between benign and malignant pleural disease: a systematic review of published reports. Histopathology 49:561–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Klebe S, Nurminen M, Leigh J, Henderson DW (2009) Diagnosis of epithelial mesothelioma using a tree-based regression analysis and a minimal panel of antibodies. Pathology 41:140–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Krismann M, Müller K (2000) Malignes mesotheliom der pleura, des perikards und des peritoneums. Chirurg 71:877–886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Krismann M, Müller KM, Jaworska M, Johnen G (2004) Pathological anatomy and molecular pathology. Lung Cancer 45:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kushitani K, Takeshima Y, Amatya VJ, Furonaka O, Sakatani A, Inai K (2007) Immunihistochemical marker panels for distinguishing between epitheliod mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Pathol Int 57:190–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mayhall FG, Gibbs AR (1991) Malignant peritoneal giving rise to multiple intestinal polyps. Histopathology 20:47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mourra N, Chaisemartin C, Vesini I et al (2005) Malignant deciduoid mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:403–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Muir C (1995) Cancer of unknown primary site. Cancer 75(1 Suppl):353–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Naito Y, Ishii G, Kawai O, Hasebe T, Nishiwaki Y, Nagai K, Ochiai A (2007) D2-40-positive solitary fibrous tumors of the pleural: diagnostic pitfall of biopsy specimen. Pathol Int 57:618–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ng SB, Ahmed Q, Tien SL, Sivaswaren C, Lau LC (2003) Primary pleural synovial sarcoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127:85–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Neumann V, Gunther S, Muller KM et al (2001) Malignant mesothelioma – German mesothelioma register 1987-1999. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 74:383–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Neumann V, Löseke S, Tannapfel A (2009) Medical insurance aspects of peritoneal tumors with particular attention to peritoneal mesotheliomas. Med Klin (Munch) 104:765–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ordonez NG (2005) Immunohistochemical diagnosis of epithelial mesothelioma: an update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:1407–1414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ordonez NG (2006) The diagnostic utility of immunhistochemistry and electron microscopy in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas: a comparative study. Pathology 19:34–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Park JY, Kim KW, Kwon HJ et al (2008) Peritoneal mesotheliomas: clinicopathological features, CT findings, and differential diagnosis. AJR 191:814–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Penman D, Downie I, Roberts F (2006) Positive immunostaining for thyroid-transcription factor-1 in primary and metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma: a note of caution. J Clin Pathol 59:663–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Plas E, Riedl C, Plueger H (1998) Malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis testis. Review of the literature and assessment of prognostic parameters. Cancer 83:2437–2446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ransom DT, Patel SR, Keeney CL, Malkasian GD, Edmondson JH (1990) Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum. A review of 33 cases treated with platin-based chemotherapy. Cancer 66:1091–1094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rdzanek M, Fresco R, Pass HI, Carbone M (2006) Spindle cell tumors of the pleura: differential diagnosis. Semin Diagn Pathol 23:44–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Riddell RH, Goodman MJ, Moossa AR (1981) Peritoneal malignant mesothelioma in a patient with recurrent peritonitis. Cancer 48:134–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Saad R, Cho P, Liu Y, Silverman JF (2004) The value of epithelial membrane antigen expression in separating benign mesothelial proliferation from malignant mesothelioma: a comparative study. Diagn Cytopathol 32:156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Salman WD, Eyden B, Shelton D et al (2009) An EMA negative, desmin positive malignant mesothelioma: limitations of immunohistochemistry? J Clin Pathol 62:651–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Schneider J, Woitowitz H (2001) Fallbericht: absestverursachtes malignes mesotheliom der tunica vaginalis testis. Zentralbl Chir 126:229–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Schorge JO, Muto MG, Lee SJ, Huang LW, Welch WR, Bell DA, Keung EZ, Berkowitz RS, Mok SC (2000) BRCA-1 related papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum has a unique molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 60:1361–1364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Schorge JO, Muto MG, Welch WR, Bandera CA, Rubin SC, Bell DA, Berkowitz RS, Mok SC (1998) Molecular evidence for multifocal papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in patients with germline BRCA-1 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:841–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Shia J, Erlandson R, Klimstra D (2002) Deciduoid mesothelioma: a report of 5 cases and literature review. Ultra Pathol 26:355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Soini Y, Kinnula V, Kahlos Km Päkkö P (2005) Claudins in differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pleura. J Clin Pathol 59:250–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Steffen HM, Wamnbach G, Hoffmann A, Jaursch-Hancke C, Kaufmann W (1989) Diagnostik und therapie des malignen peritonealen mesothelioms. Med Klin 84:469–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sugarbaker P, Achermann Y, Brun E (2002) Deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma. Contemp Surg 58:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  72. Tannapfel A, Brücher B, Schlag PM (2009) Peritoneal mesothelioma – rare abdominal tumors. Der Onkologe 15:250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Tischoff I, Tannapfel A (2007) Pathologic and anatomic evidence of peritoneal metastases. Chirurg 78:1088–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Travis WD, Churg A, Aubry MC, Ordonez NG, Tazelaar H, Pugatch R, Manabe T, Miettinen M (2004) Mesenchymal tumours. In: Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC (eds) World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung, Pleura, thymus and heart. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  75. Truong LD, Maccato ML, Awalt H, Cagle PT, Schwartz MR, Kaplan AL (1990) Serous surface carcinoma of the peritoneum: a clinicopathologic study of 22 cases. Hum Pathol 21:91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tsao AS, Wistuba I, Roth JA, Kindler HL (2009) Malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 27:2081–2090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Van Ruth S, Achermann YIZ, Van de Vijver MJ, Hart AAM, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FAN (2003) Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of 62 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:682–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Yan TD, Popa E, Brun EA et al (2006) Sex difference in diffuse malignant mesothelima. Br J Surg 93:1536–1542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Yazij H, Battifora H, Barry TS, Hwang HC, Bacchi CE, McIntosh MW, Kussick SJ, Gown AM (2006) Evaluation of 12 antibodies for distinguishing epithelial mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma: identification of a three-antibody immunohistochemical panel with maximal sensitivity and specificity. Mod Pathol 19:514–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Tannapfel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tischoff, I., Neid, M., Neumann, V., Tannapfel, A. (2011). Pathohistological Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis. In: Tannapfel, A. (eds) Malignant Mesothelioma. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 189. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10862-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10862-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10861-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10862-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics