Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mixed Methods

  • Chapter
Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie

Zusammenfassung

Mixed Methods (im Folgenden: MM) bezeichnet im weitesten Sinne die Kombination von Elementen eines qualitativen und eines quantitativen Forschungsansatzes innerhalb einer Untersuchung oder mehrerer aufeinander bezogener Untersuchungen. Die Kombination kann sich dabei auf die zugrunde liegende wissenschaftstheoretische Position und die Fragestellung, auf die Methoden der Datenerhebung oder der -auswertung oder auch auf die Verfahren der Interpretation und der Qualitätssicherung beziehen (Definition in Anlehnung an Johnson, Onwuegbuzie & Turner 2007, S.123).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Plano Clark, Vicki L. & Creswell, John W. (Hrsg.) (2008). The mixed methods reader. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Zazie; Nerlich, Brigitte; McKeown, Susanne & Clarke, David (Hrsg.) (2004). Mixing methodsin psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Bergman, Max (Hrsg.) (2008a). Advances in mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, Max (2008b). The straw men of the qualitative-quantitative divide and their influence on mixed methods research. In Max Bergman (Hrsg.), Advances in mixed methods research (S.11–21). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, Alan (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, Alan (2008). Why do researchers integrate / combine / mesh / blend / mix / merge / fuse quantitative and qualitative research? In Max Bergman (Hrsg.), Advances in mixed methods research (S.87–100). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. & Fiske, Donald W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W. & Plano Clark, Vicki L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. (1970). The research act. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. (1989). The research act (3. Aufl.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger, Christian (1998). Zahlen und Wörter. Die Verbindung quantitativer und qualitativer Daten und Methoden im Forschungsprozess. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, Nigel & Fielding, Jane (1986). Linking data. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, Uwe (2004). Triangulation. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer; Caracelli, Valerie J. & Graham, Wendy F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, Norbert (2006). Gibt es Wege aus der selbstverschuldeten Irrelevanz des qualitativen Offstreams? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 34, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604347.

  • Hammersley, Martyn (2008). Troubles with triangulation. In Max Bergman (Hrsg.), Advances in mixed methods research (S.22–36). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, William E.; Creswell, John W.; Plano Clark, Vicki L.; Petska, Kelly S. & Creswell, David J. (2005). Mixed methods research design in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Anne (2007). How to add qualitative profundity to quantitative findings in a study on cooperative learning. In Philipp Mayring, Günter L. Huber, Leo Gürtler & Mechthild Kiegelmann (Hrsg.), Mixed methodology in psychological research (S.179–190). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, Marie; Lazarsfeld, Paul & Zeisl, Hans (1975). Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal. Ein soziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langandauernder Arbeitslosigkeit (7. Auflage). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. [Orig. 1933]

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetzko, Dietmar (2001). Processing raw data both the qualitative and quantitative way. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 11, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0101111.

  • Jick, Todd D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Burke & Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Burke; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. & Turner, Lisa A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, Udo (2001). Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 5, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs010159.

  • Kelle, Udo (2008). Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, Udo & Erzberger, Christian (1999). Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden: methodologische Modelle und ihre Bedeutung für die Forschungspraxis. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 51, 509–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroman Myers, Karen & Oetzel, John G. (2003). Exploring the dimensions of organizational assimilation. Creating and validating a measure. Communication Quarterly, 51, 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiken, Don & Miall, David S. (2001). Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 15, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0101153.

  • Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In David M. Fetterman (Hrsg.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution (S.89–115). London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (S.105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3. Aufl., S.191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madill, Anna & Gough, Brendan (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13(3), 254–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Jennifer (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Joseph E. & Loomis, Diane (2003). Mixed methods design: an alternative approach. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie (Hrsg.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (S.241–271). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, Philipp (2001). Kombination und Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Analyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 6, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs010162.

  • Mayring, Philipp; Huber, Günter L.; Gürtler, Leo & Kiegelmann, Mechthild (Hrsg.) (2007). Mixed methodology in psychological research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David L. (2007). Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Janice M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Janice M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie (Hrsg.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (S.189–208). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich, Brigitte (2004). Coming full (hermeneutic) circle: The controversy about psychological methods. In Zazie Todd, Brigitte Nerlich, Suzanne McKeown & David D. Clarke (Hrsg.), Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (S.17–36). New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odag, Özen (2007). Wenn Männer von der Liebe lesen und Frauen von Abenteuern. Eine empirische Rezeptionsstudie zur emotionalen Beteiligung von Männern und Frauen beim Lesen narrativer Texte. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, Jean S. & Devich-Navarro, Monica (1997). Variations in bicultural identification among African American and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, Vicki L. & Creswell, John W. (Hrsg.) (2008). The mixed methods reader. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Heather; Mihalas, Stephanie; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony; Suldo, Shannon & Daley, Christine (2008). Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of the trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn Patton, Michael (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, Fritz J. & Dickson, William J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, Gretchen B. & Wilson, Bruce L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, Margarete (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, Margrit & Fielding, Nigel (Hrsg.) (2001). Qualitative and quantitative research. Conjunctions and divergencies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/26.

  • Schweizer, Karin; Paechter, Manuela & Weidenmann, Bernd (2007). Coherence in knowledge communication: How do online groups communicate? In Philipp Mayring, Günter L. Huber, Leo Gürtler & Mechthild Kiegelmann (Hrsg.), Mixed methodology in psychological research (S.101–112). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, Gary (2007). How to tap the full potential of qualitative research by applying qualitative methods. In Philipp Mayring, Günter L. Huber, Leo Gürtler & Mechthild Kiegelmann (Hrsg.), Mixed methodology in psychological research (S.7–13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, Muzafer; Harvey, O. J.; White, B. Jack; Hood, William R. & Sherif, Carolyn W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: the Robbers Cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Sherif/.

  • Tashakkori, Abbas & Cressfield, John (2008). Editorial: Mixed methodology across disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, Abbas & Teddlie, Charles (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, Abbas & Teddlie, Charles (Hrsg.) (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, Abbas & Teddlie, Charles (2008). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In Max Bergman (Hrsg.), Advances in mixed methods research (S.101–119). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, Charles & Tashakkori, Abbas (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, Charles & Yu, Fen (2007). Mixed methods sampling. A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomae, Hans (1959). Forschungsmethoden der Entwicklungspsychologie. In Hans Thomae (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Band 3: Entwicklungspsychologie (S.46–75). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Zazie & Nerlich, Brigitte (2004). Future directions. In Zazie Todd, Brigitte Nerlich, Suzanne McKeown & David D. Clarke (Hrsg.), Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (S.325–332). New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Zazie; Nerlich, Brigitte & McKeown, Suzanne (2004). Introduction. In Zazie Todd, Brigitte Nerlich, Suzanne McKeown & David D. Clarke (Hrsg.), Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (S.3–16). New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Zazie; Nerlich, Brigitte; McKeown, Susanne & Clarke, David (Hrsg.) (2004). Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, Deborah L. & Szalacha, Laura A. (1999). Dimensions of desire. Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waszak, Cindy & Sines, Marilyn C. (2003). Mixed methods in psychological research. In Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie (Hrsg.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (S.557–576). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, Niobe; Stauber, Helena Y.; Nakkula, Michael J. & London, Perry (1994). Depression and substance use in two divergent high school cultures. A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23(3), 331–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Elizabeth N.; Judge, Ann B.; Hill, Clara E. & Hoffman, Mary A. (1997). Experience of novice therapists in prepracticum: Trainees’, clients’, and supervisors’ perceptions of therapists’ personal reactions and management strategies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Margrit Schreier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Özen Odağ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Günter Mey Katja Mruck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schreier, M., Odağ, Ö. (2010). Mixed Methods. In: Mey, G., Mruck, K. (eds) Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_18

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16726-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92052-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation