Skip to main content

Histopathologic Interpretation of Mohs Slides

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Abstract

Interpretation of Mohs slides is the most critical step in MMS. Mohs surgeons should be adept in identifying different cutaneous structures and in detecting different skin neoplasms. Missing a focus of tumor will result in tumor recurrence. Likewise, interpreting slides with missing pieces of tissue may result in tumor recurrence. Technical errors represent the most common cause of local recurrence after MMS. Consequently, Mohs surgeons should verify that 100% of the margin is evaluated including the entire deep margin and all epidermal peripheries. Tumor prognosis could be dependent on the identification of certain changes in the Mohs slides such as angiovascular invasion or perineural invasion. On the other hand, lack of experience in identifying cutaneous structures such as a bulge, a mantle, a folliculocentric basaloid proliferation (funny follicle), or an atypical reactive endothelial cell may result in unnecessary extra stages which would lead to unnecessarily larger defects. This would negate the purpose of MMS in producing the smallest possible defect with clear margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mariwalla K, Aasi SZ, Glusac EJ, Leffell DJ. Mohs micrographic surgery histopathology concordance. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(1):94–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hruza GJ. Mohs micrographic surgery local recurrences. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20:573–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu Y, Finn DT. Crescent versus rectangle: is it a true negative margin in second and subsequent stages of Mohs surgery? Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(2):171–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whalen J, Leone D. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of malignant melanoma. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27(6):597–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehrany K, Byrd DR, Roenigk RK, et al. Lymphocytic infiltrates and subclinical epithelial tumor extension in patients with chronic leukemia and solid-organ transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:129–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Katz KH, Helm KF, Billingsley EM, et al. Dense inflammation does not mask residual primary basal cell carcinoma during Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:231–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Albregts T, Orengo I, Salasche S, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. An intraoperative diagnostic challenge for the Mohs surgeon. Dermatol Surg. 1998;64:269–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuttle MS, Rosenberg AS, Winfield HL, Somach SC. Pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia with follicular differentiation overlying basal cell carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2009;31(6):557–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cochran AJ. The incidence of melanocytes in normal skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1970;55:65–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dean NR, Brennan J, Haynes J, et al. Immunohistochemical labeling of normal melanocytes. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2002;10:199–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilchrest BA, Blog FB, Szabo G. Effects of aging and chronic sun exposure on melanocytes in human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1979;73:141–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toda K, Kathak MA, Parrish JA, et al. Alteration of racial differences in melanosome distribution in human epidermis after exposure to ultraviolet light. Nature. 1972;236:143–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hendi A, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Melanocytes in long-standing sun-exposed skin: quantitative analysis using the MART-1 immunostain. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(7):871–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zitelli JA, Brown CD, Hanusa BH. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(3 Pt 1):422–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zalla MJ, Lim KK, Dicaudo DJ, Gagnot MM. Mohs micrographic excision of melanoma using immunostains. Der­matol Surg. 2000;26:771–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Florell SR, Zone JJ, Gerwels JW. Basal cell carcinomas are populated by melanocytes and Langerhans cells. Am J Dermatopathol. 2001;23(1):24–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Whiting DA. Histology of normal hair. In: Hordinsky MK, Sawaya ME, Scher RK, editors. Atlas of hair and nails. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ackerman AB, Reddy VB, Soyer HP. Anatomic, histologic, and biological aspects. In: Neoplasms with follicular differentiation. New York, NY: Ardor Scribendi Publishers; 2001. p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hassanein AM, Al-Quran SZ, Kantor GR, et al. Thomsen-Friedenreich (T) antigen: a possible tool for differentiating sebaceous carcinoma from its simulators. Appl Imm­unohistochem Mol Morphol. 2001;9(3):250–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hassanein AM. Sebaceous carcinoma and the T-antigen. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2004;23(1):62–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao NA, Hidayat AA, McLeon IW. Sebaceous carcinomas of the ocular adnexa: a clinicopathologic study of 104 cases, with five-year follow-up data. Hum Pathol. 1982;13:113–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Holecek B-U, Ackerman AB. Bulge-activation hypothesis: is it valid? Am J Dermatopathol. 1993;15:235.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Herman KL, Kantor GR, Katz SM. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ overlying dermatofibroma. J Cutan Pathol. 1990;17(6):385–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hassanein AM, Proper SA, Depcik-Smith ND, Flowers FP. Peritumoral fibrosis in basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma mimicking perineural invasion: potential pitfall in Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9 Pt 1):1101–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abbas O, Bhawan J. Cutaneous perineural inflammation: a review. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37(12):1200–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moehrle M, Breuinger H, Schippert W, Häfner HM. Letter: Imiquimod 5% cream as adjunctive therapy for primary, solitary, nodular basal cell carcinomas before Mohs micrographic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(3):428–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashraf M. Hassanein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hassanein, A.M., Hassanein, H.A. (2012). Histopathologic Interpretation of Mohs Slides. In: Nouri, K. (eds) Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2151-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2152-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics