Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443.38.3.181

Zusammenfassung.Hintergrund: Zur Übertragbarkeit der in randomisierten, kontrollierten Studien erzielten Wirksamkeit psychotherapeutischer Interventionen für soziale Angststörung in der psychotherapeutischen Praxis sowie zur Vorhersage des Therapieausgangs liegen bisher wenige Ergebnisse vor. Methode: In einer universitären psychotherapeutischen Hochschul- und Ausbildungsambulanz wurde an N = 131 Patienten mit einer Sozialen Phobie die Wirksamkeit einer verhaltenstherapeutisch orientierten Therapie überprüft. Die retrospektiv durch Aktenstudium erfassten angewandten Therapietechniken sowie weitere Variablen wurden als Prädiktoren des Therapieerfolgs untersucht. Ergebnisse: Intragruppen-Effektstärken unmittelbar nach der Therapie variierten zwischen 1.11–1.26 für die Completer-, sowie 0.64 – 0.81 für die Intent-to-Treat-Stichprobe. Keine der Behandlungen folgte vollständig einer manualisierten Therapieform, bei nur 31% basierten mehr als drei Viertel der Therapie auf demselben Therapierational. Überwiegend wurden Techniken aus der Kognitiven Therapie, der Konfrontationstherapie und des Sozialen Kompetenztrainings kombiniert. Das Ausmaß der positiven Veränderung auf störungsspezifischen Instrumenten war geringer bei Durchführung von Exposition in vivo im Vergleich zu den anderen Therapiebausteinen. Auch ergaben sich geringere Effektstärken, wenn Rollenspiele aus der Kognitiven Therapie isoliert ohne Einbau in ihren logischen Zusammenhang der behavioralen Überprüfung dysfunktionaler Gedanken (Verhaltensexperimente) eingesetzt wurden. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Psychotherapie in der Hochschul- und Ausbildungsambulanz der TU Braunschweig ist wirksam, jedoch sind die Effektstärken unter denen, die in neueren RCTs berichtet werden. Die verwendeten Therapietechniken setzten sich mehrheitlich aus unterschiedlichen Therapiemanualen zusammen und es wird nicht eine bestimmte Methode verfolgt, wie es in randomisierten Therapiestudien üblich ist. Dies impliziert eine Diskrepanz zwischen Leistungen, die im Rahmen von randomisierten Forschungsstudien im Vergleich zur Praxis erbracht werden.


Efficacy of outpatient psychotherapy for social anxiety in a university hospital: Are research results transported into practice?

Abstract.Background: There is a lack of empirical findings on the transportability of effective psychotherapy interventions and on the prediction of outcome for social anxiety disorder treated in the field. Methods: 131 patients diagnosed with social phobia were treated in a university-based psychotherapy outpatient clinic with a focus on cognitive-behavioral treatments. Techniques applied in individual treatments were identified retrospectively on the basis of patient files and investigated alongside other variables as predictors of treatment outcome. Results: Within-group effect sizes varied between 1.11 and 1.26 for completers, and between 0.64 and 0.81 for the intent-to-treat sample. None of the interventions was delivered according to only one treatment manual and only in 31% was at least three quarters of the treatment based on the same rationale. Most treatments drew on cognitive therapy, exposure therapy, and social skills training. There was a reduced positive effect size for exposure in vivo when compared to other treatment components. Furthermore, lower effect sizes occurred when role-play was implemented in isolation from its origin in behavioral experiments to examine dysfunctional thoughts. Conclusions: Treatment of social anxiety disorder in the outpatient clinic of the TU Braunschweig is effective; however, the effect sizes are below those reported in recent RCTs. The intervention techniques employed are predominantly drawn from different treatment manuals and they do not follow one specific method, as is customary in randomized treatment studies, indicating a discrepancy between services delivered in research versus field settings.

Literatur

  • American Psychiatric Association . (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, A. T. , Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory – manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beuncken, C. , Molenbergh, G. , Kenward, M. G. (2005). Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 2, 379–386. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, G. (1985). Exposure as a treatment for social phobia: Some instructive difficulties. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23 (6), 651–657. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chambless, D. L. , Tran, G. Q. , Glass, C. R. (1997). Predictors of response to cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 221–240. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, D. M. (1999). Anxiety Disorders: why they persist and how to treat them. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 5–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, D. M. , Ehlers, A. , Hackmann, A. , McManus, F. , Fennell, M. , Grey, N. , Waddington, L. , Wild, J. (2006). Cognitive therapy versus exposure and applied relaxation in social phobia: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 568–578. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, D. M. , Ehlers, A. , McManus, F. , Hackmann, A. , Fennell, M. , Campbell et al. (2003). Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in generalized social phobia: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 1058–1067. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, D. M. , Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1994). SCL-90: Administration, scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Revised and updated. New Jersey, USA: Carol Publishing Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feske, U. , Chambless, D.L. (1995). Cognitive behavioral versus exposure only treatment for social phobia: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy, 26, 695–720. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fydrich, T. , Renneberg, B. , Schmitz, B. , Wittchen, H.-U. (1997). SKID-II. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV, Achse II (Persönlichkeitsstörungen). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Franke, G. (2002). Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis – Deutsche Version (2. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gaston, J. E. , Abbott, M. J. , Rapee, R. M. , Neary, S. A. (2006). Do empirically supported treatments generalize to private practice? A benchmark study of cognitive-behavoural group treatment programme for social phobia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 33–48. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, R. D. , Hedecker, D. R. , Davis, J. M. (1993). Estimation of effect size from a series of experiments involving paired comparisons. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18 (3), 271–279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hahlweg, K. , Fiegenbaum, W. , Schröder, B. , Frank, M. , von Witzleben, I. (2004). Klinische Brauchbarkeit der Konfrontationstherapie für agoraphobische Patienten: Einfluss von syndromaler Komorbidität und therapeutischer Erfahrung. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 33, 130–138. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hahlweg, K. , Hermann, F. , Kröger, C. (2007). Wirksamkeit der Psychotherapien in Ausbildungs- und Hochschulambulanz. Unveröffentlichter Bericht. TU Braunschweig. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Halinski, R. S. , Feldt, L. S. (1970). The selection of variables in multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement 7 (3), 151–157. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haug, T. T. , Hellstrøm, K. , Blomhoff, S. , Humble, M. , Madsbu, H.-P. , Wold, J. E. (2000). The treatment of social phobia in general practice. Is exposure therapy feasible? Family Practice, 17, 144–118. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hautzinger, M. , Bailer, M. , Worall, H. , Keller, F. (1995). Beck-Depressions-Inventar (BDI). (2. Aufl.). Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, A. , Herzog, T. (1995). Varianten der Effektstärkenberechnung in Meta-Analysen: Kommt es zu variable Ergebnissen? Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 24, 337–343. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heimberg, R. G. , Juster, H. R. (1995). Cognitive-behavioral treatments: Literature Review. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Treatment (pp. 261–309). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heinrichs, N. , Hahlweg, K. , Fiegenbaum, W. , Frank, M. , Schröder, B. , von Witzleben, I. (2002). Validität und Reliabilität der Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) und der Social Phobia Scale (SPS). Verhaltenstherapie, 12, 26–35. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G. (2000). Treatment of social phobia: Potential mediators and moderators. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 3–16. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G. (2004). Cogntive mediation of treatment change in social phobia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72 (3), 393–399. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, S. G. , Smits, J. A. J. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69 (4), 621–632. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobcon, N. S. , Truax, P. (1991). Clinical Significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59 (1), 12–19. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, E. J. (2005). The effect of the decreased safety behaviours on anxiety and negative thoughts in social phobics. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19 (1), 69–86. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lincoln, T. M. , Rief, W. (2004). How much do sample characteristics affect the effect size? An investigation of studies testing the treatment effects for social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 18, 515–529. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lincoln, T. M. , Rief, W. , Hahlweg, K. , Frank, M. , von Witzleben, I. , Schröder, B. , Fiegenbaum, W. (2003). Effectiveness of an empirically supported treatment for social phobia in the field. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1251–1269. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lincoln, T. M. , Rief, W. , Hahlweg, K. , Frank, M. , von Witzleben, I. , Schröder, B. , Fiegenbaum, W. (2005). Who comes, who stays, who profits? Predicting refusal, dropout, success, and relapse in a short intervention for social phobia. Psychotherapy Research, 15, 210–225. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Longmore, R. J. , Worrell, M. (2007). Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behaviour therapy? Clinical Psychology Review, 27 (2), 173–187. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Margraf, J. , Schneider, S. , Ehlers, A. (1991). Diagnostisches Interview bei psychischen Störungen DIPS. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marzillier, J. S. , Lambert, C. , Kellett, J. (1976). A controlled evaluation of systematic desensitisation and social skills training for socially inadequate psychiatric patients. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 225–238. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mattick, R. P. , Clarke, J. C. (1989). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 20, 3–23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McEvoy, P. M. (2007). The effectiveness of cognitive behavioural group therapy for social phobia in a community clinic: A benchmarking study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45 (12), 3030–3040. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McManus, F. , Sacadura, C. , Clark, D. M. (2008). Why social anxiety persists: An experimental investigation of the role of safety behaviours as a maintaining factor. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 39 (2), 147–161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milne, D. (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 46, 437–447. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milne, D. , James, I. (2000). A systematic review of effective cognitive-behavioural supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 111–127. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morgan, H. , Raffle, C. (1999). Does reducing safety behaviours improve treatment response in patients with social phobia? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 33, 503–510. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mörtberg, E. , Clark, D. M. , Sundin, Ö. , Åberg Wistedt, A. (2007). Intensive group cognitive treatment and individual cognitive therapy vs. treatment as usual in social phobia: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 115, 142–154. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nathan, P. E. , Stuart, S. P. , Dolan, S. L. (2000). Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Psychological Bulletin, 126 (6), 964–981. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norcross, J. C. (2005). A primer on psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross, M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norcross, J. C. , Karpiak, C. P. , Lister, K. M. (2005). A study of self-identified integrative and (occasionally) eclectic psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61 (12), 1587–1594. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ponniah, K. , Hollon, S. D. (2008). Empirically supported psychological interventions for social phobia in adults: A qualitative review of randomized controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, 38, 3–14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raudenbush, S. , Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scholing, A. , Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1999). Prediction of treatment outcome in social phobia: a cross validation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 659–670. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, M. L. , Glass, G. V. , Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stangier, U. , Clark, D. M. , Ehlers, A. (2006). Soziale Phobie. (Fortschritte der Psychotherapie – Bd. 28). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stangier, U. , Heidenreich, T. , Berardi, A. , Golbs, U. , Hoyer, J. (1999). Die Erfassung sozialer Phobie durch die Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) und die Social Phobia Scale (SPS). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 28, 28–36. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stangier, U. , Heidenreich, T. , Peitz, M. (2003). Soziale Phobien: Ein kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutisches Behandlungsmanual. Weinheim: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stangier, U. , Heidenreich, T. , Peitz, M. , Lauterbach, W. , Clark, D. M. (2003). Cognitive therapy for social phobia: Individual versus group treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 991–1007. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt, Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung (2008). Bildung in Deutschland 2008. https://www.ec. destatis.de/csp/shop/sfg/bpm.html.cms.cBroker.cls?cmspath= struktur,vollanzeige.csp&ID=1022245 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, S. M. , Beidel, D. C. , Wolff, P. L. , Spaulding, S. , Jacob, R. G. (1996). Clinical features affecting treatment outcome in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 795–804. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Viera, A. J. , Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37 (5), 360–363. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. , Clark, D. M. , Salkovskis, P. , Ludgate, J. , Hackmann, A. , Gelder, M. G. (1995). Social phobia: The role of in-situation safety behavors in maintaining anxiety and negative beliefs. Behavior Therapy, 26, 153–161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, A. , Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Social phobia: Effects of external attention of anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspektive taking. Behavior Therapy, 29, 357–370. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weltgesundheitsorganisation . (2004). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10 Kapitel V (F). Diagnostische Kriterien für Forschung und Praxis, WHO (3th ed.). Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar