Skip to main content
Studie

Selbstregulation und flexible Zielanpassung im Vorschulalter

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0942-5403/a000212

Zusammenfassung. Flexible Zielanpassungsprozesse sind mit psychischer sowie physischer Gesundheit assoziiert. Dabei wird die kindliche Selbstregulation als Entwicklungsbedingung diskutiert, Studien zum Zusammenhang der Entwicklung von Selbstregulation und kindlichen Zielanpassungsprozessen existieren bislang jedoch nicht. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht bei N = 97 3- bis 6-jährigen Kindern und ihren Eltern Zusammenhänge sowie Entwicklungstrends kindlicher Selbstregulation – gemessen im Fremdurteil (BRIEF-P) sowie auf Verhaltensebene (Gift Delay) – und flexiblen Zielanpassungsprozessen. Während junge Kinder (entgegen der Erwartung) signifikant stärkere Zielanpassung bei geringer Selbstregulation aufweisen, zeigen ältere Kinder mit ausgeprägter Zielanpassung tendenziell eine höhere Selbstregulation. Die vorliegenden Befunde unterstreichen die Bedeutsamkeit der Entwicklung von Selbstregulation für flexible Zielanpassungsprozesse im jungen Vorschulalter.


Self-Regulation and Flexible Goal Adjustment Among Preschool Children

Abstract. Flexible goal adjustment is viewed as an adaptive coping resource and is associated with mental and physical health as well as with greater life satisfaction and well-being. The two-process model of developmental regulation assumes specific cognitive processes (e. g., mind sets) as essential conditions for flexible goal adjustment, although the developmental antecedents of the individual’s capabilities of goal adjustment are rarely investigated. In this study, self-regulatory processes in childhood (e. g., executive function [EF] or abilities for delayed gratification) are hypothesized to be conditions for the development of adaptive regulatory processes. Cognitive control processes, such as EF (e. g., emotional control processes, attention shifting, and inhibition), are believed to serve as basic functions underlying flexible goal adjustment. According to empirical studies, EFs are interpreted as higher cognitive and self-regulatory processes that control a person’s thinking, feeling, and acting with the aim of emotionally and behaviorally flexible reactions. Numerous findings at preschool age emphasize a crucial phase of development between the third and fifth year of life when the effectivity of EF improves. However, research on the development of self-regulation in relation to flexible goal adjustment is lacking. The present empirical study on 3- to 6-year-old children (N = 97) and their parents examines relations and developmental trends of children’s self-regulation, measured by parents’ proxy reports (BRIEF-P) and behavioral data (Gift-Delay Task), and flexible goal adjustment, measured by reactive adjustment of preferences. We expect positive correlations between the child’s self-regulation and flexible goal adjustment, which should be displayed more clearly with age and maturation of executive control. Contrary to our expectations, young children with low self-regulation demonstrate more goal adjustment than young children with high self-regulatory skills. By contrast, our results suggest (albeit insignificantly) that older children with high self-regulation show more goal adjustment than older children with low self-regulatory skills. One possible explanation could be that children acquire flexible goal adjustment as adaptive coping competencies in terms of “letting go” at a specific age. At younger ages, these processes could (from the perspective of a child) be considered as dysfunctional in the sense of “giving up.” The findings emphasize the importance of the development of self-regulation (i. e., EF and children’s ability to delay gratification) in the context of flexible goal adjustment at preschool age.

Literatur

  • Bortz, J. & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (4. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brandtstädter, J. (2007). Das flexible Selbst: Selbstentwicklung zwischen Zielbindung und Ablösung. München: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brandtstädter, J. & Greve, W. (1994). The aging self: Stabilizing and protective processes. Developmental Review, 14, 52 – 80. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brandtstädter, J. & Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: Explication and age related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychology and Aging, 5, 58 – 67. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brandtstädter, J. & Rothermund, K. (2002). The life-course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: A two-process framework. Developmental Review, 22, 117 – 150. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Calkins, S. D. (2007). The emergence of self-regulation: Biological and behavioral control mechanisms supporting toddler competencies. In Brownell, C. A.Kopp, C. B.Eds., Socioemotional development in the toddler years: Transitions andtransformations (pp. 261 – 284). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Calkins, S. D. & Howse, R. B. (2004). Individual differences in self-regulation: Implications for childhood adjustment. In Philippot, P.Feldman, R. S.Eds., The regulation of emotion (pp. 307 – 322). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carlson, S. M. (2005). Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 595 – 616. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In Vohs, K. D.Baumeister, R. F.Eds., Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed.; pp. 3 – 21). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Daseking, M. & Petermann, F. (2013). Verhaltensinventar zur Beurteilung exekutiver Funktionen für das Kindergartenalter (BRIEF-P). Deutschsprachige Adaptation des Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C. & Vaughan, J. (2007). Effortful control and its socioemotional consequences. In Gross, J. J.Ed., Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 287 – 306). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eisenberg, N., Smith, C. L. & Spinrad, T. L. (2011). Effortful control: Relations with emotion regulation, adjustment, and socialization in childhood. In Vohs K. D.Baumeister, R. F.Eds., Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 263 – 283). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gioia, G., Espy, K. & Isquith, P. K. (2003). Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Odessa, Florida: PAR. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greve, W. & Thomsen, T. (2013). Developmental conditions of adaptive self-stabilization in adolescence: An exploratory study. International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 119 – 131. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grolnick, W. S. & Farkas, M. (2002). Parenting and the development of children‘s selfregulation. In Bornstein, M. H.Ed., Handbook of parenting (pp. 89 – 110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Holodynski, M., Hermann, S. & Kromm, H. (2013). Entwicklungspsychologische Grundlagen der Emotionsregulation. Psychologische Rundschau, 64, 196 – 207. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kalisch, R. (2009). The functional neuroanatomy of reappraisal: Time matters. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 1215 – 1226. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karoly, P., Boekaerts, M. & Maes, S. (2005). Toward consensus in the psychology of selfregulation: How far have we come? How far do we have yet to travel. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 300 – 311. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199 – 214. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lessing, N., Mähler, C. & Greve, W. (2015). Zur Erfassung und Validierung akkommodativer Bewältigungsfähigkeiten im Grundschulalter – Ein Erhebungsinstrument. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 47, 210 – 218. doi:10.1026/0049 – 8637/a000138 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • McCabe, L. A., Rebello-Britto, P., Hernandez, M. & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2004). Games children play: Observing young children’s self-regulation across laboratory, home, and school settings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A. & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘‘Frontal Lobe’’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49 – 100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Rethinking feelings: An fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1215 – 1229. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ochsner, K. N. & Gross, J. J. (2007). The neural architecture of emotion regulation. In Gross, J. J.Ed., Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 87 – 109). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Posner, M. I. & Rothbart, M. K. (2000). Developing mechanisms of self-regulation. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 427 – 441. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomsen, T. & Greve, W. (2013). Accommodative coping in early adolescence: An investigation of possible developmental components. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 971 – 981. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vohs, K. D. & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation. Research, theory, and application (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R. & Carver, C. S. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1494 – 1508. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zelazo, P. D. & Cunningham, W. (2007). Executive function: Mechanisms underlying emotion regulation. In Gross, J.Ed., Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zelazo, P. D. & Müller, U. (2002). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. GoswamiEd., Handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 445 – 469). Oxford: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar