Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 7))

Summary

Program evaluation provides a set of procedures and tools that can be employed to provide useful information about medical school programs and their components to decision-makers. This chapter begins with contemporary views of program evaluation. It describes the various proposals of evaluation and the areas of decision-making that they can inform. Logic models are introduced as a tool to facilitate evaluation activities. The importance of including stakeholders in planning an evaluation and in clarifying the evaluation questions and goals is stressed. Evaluation requires careful planning, as this activity is always somewhat political in nature. Inadequate attention to planning may lead to questionable information and to poor uptake of results. A series of basic issues that must be considered in developing an evaluation strategy for medical education programs is described and illustrated with examples from recent program evaluation activities in undergraduate medical education. Recommendations are made about how we can continue to improve evaluation activities including some guidelines for those who wish to evaluate medical education programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albanese, M. (1999) Rating educational quality: factors in the erosion of professional standards. Academic Medicine 74(6)652–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashikawa, H., Hojat, M., Zeleznik, C., & Gonella, J. S. (1991). Reexamination of relationships between students’ undergraduate majors, medical school performances, and career plans at Jefferson Medical College. Academic Medicine 66(8)458–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J. C., Cohen, A. B., Barker, D. C., Shuster, A. L., & Reynolds, R. C. (1991). Medical educators’views on medical education reform.Journal of the American Medical Association 265(8)1002–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, S. M., Swanson, D. B., Ripkey, D. R., Bowles, L. T., & Melnick, D. E. (1996). Performance of the class of 1994 in the new era of USMLE.Academic Medicine71(10 Suppl), S91–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, T. W. H., Lam, T. H., & Cheng, Y. H. (1996). Knowledge and attitudes about smoking in medical students before and after a tobacco seminar.Medical Education 30(4)290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H.&Hedges, L. V. (1994).The handbook of research synthesis.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1982).Designing and evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Marchais, J. E., & Bondage G. (1998). Sustaining curricular change at Sherbrooke through external, formative program evaluation.Academic Medicine73(5), 494–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism: their form and function in educational evaluation.Journal of Aesthetic Education 3135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, B. M., & Woodward, C. A. (1987). A comparison of the career choices of McMaster medical graduates and contemporary Canadian graduates: a secondary analysis of the physician manpower data collected by the Canadian Medical Association.Canadian Medical Association Journal 13639–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. A. (1994). Long-term follow-up of an alternative medical curriculum.Academic Medicine69(6), 501–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, C. P., Krams, D. S., & Mattem, W. D. (1991). Improving the curriculum through continuous evaluation.Academic Medicine66(5), 257–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, C. P., deBliek, R., Greer, D. S., Mennin, S. P., Norman, G. R., Sheps, Swanson, D. B., & Woodward, C. A. (1990). Charting the winds of change: evaluating innovative medical curricula.Academic Medicine 658–14. Reprinted in:Ann Community-Oriented Educ(1992)5167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrity, M. S., & Mahaffy, J. (1998). Evaluating change in medical school curricula: How did we know where we were going?Academic Medicine73(Suppl 9), S55–S59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln Y. S. (1989).Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafferty, F. W. (1998). Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum.Academic Medicine73(4), 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenfeldt, K., & Lowry, S. (1997). Evaluation of undergraduate medical education - why and wow?Annals of Medicine 29357–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Brigham, T. P., Gottheil, E., Xu, G., Glaser, K., & Veloski, J. J. (1998). Medical students’ personal values and their career choices a quarter-century later.Psychological Reports83(1), 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., Veloski, J. J., & Erdmann, J. B. (1993). Is the glass half full or half empty? A reexamination of the associations between assessment measures during medical school and clinical competence after graduation.Academic Medicine 68(2Suppl.), S69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., & Xu, G. (1995). Gender comparisons of young physicians’ perceptions of their medical education, professional life, and practice: a follow-up study of Jefferson Medical College graduates.Academic Medicine70(4), 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Informatics Panel and the Population Perspective Panel. (1999). The Medical School Objectives Project. Contemporary issues in medicine - medical informatics and population health: report II of the Medical School Objectives Project. Academic Medicine 74(2)130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassebaum, D. (1990). The measurement of outcomes in the assessment of educational program effectiveness.Academic Medicine 65293–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassebaum, D. G., Eaglen, R. H., & Cutler, E. R. (1997a). The objectives of medical education: Reflections in the accreditation looking glass.Academic Medicine72(7), 648–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassebaum, D. G., Culter, E. R., & Eaglen, R. H. (1997b). The influence of accredition on educational change in U.S. medical schools.Academic Medicine72(12)1128–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. (1985).Implementing problem-based medical education: Lessons from successful innovations.New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A., Mennin, S., Waterman, R., Duban, S., Hansbarger, C., Silverblatt, H., Obenshain, S. S., Kantrowitz, M., Becker, T., & Samet, J. (1989). The New Mexico experiment: educational innovation and institutional change.Academic Medicine 64(6)285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D. M., & Mann, K. V. (1998). Comparing achievement on the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part I of students in conventional and problem-based learning curricula.Academic Medicine73(11), 1211–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawry, G. V., Schudlt, S. S., Kreiter, C. D., Densen, P.&Albanese, M. (1999). Teaching a screening musculoskeletal examination: A randomized, controlled trail of different instructional methods.Academic Medicine74(2), 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, L. O., Papp, K. K., Hodder, S. L., Workings, M. G., Wolfe, L., Glover, P.&Headrick, L. A. (1999). Performance of thrid-year primary-care-track students in an integrated curriculum at Case Western Reserve University.Academic Medicine74(1Suppl), S82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). (1997). Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Accreditation and the Liaison Committee on Medical Education; Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree. Liaison Committee on Medical Education, Washington, DC and Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, C. J., Veloski, J. J., Barzansky, B., Xu, G., & Fields, S. K. (1994). Medical school and student characteristics that influence choosing a generalist career.Journal of the American Medical Association272(9), 661–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, R. G., & Woodward, C. A. (1984). Faculty perceptions of the McMaster M.D. program.Journal of Medical Education 59842–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical School Objectives Writing Group. (1999). Learning objectives for medical student education. Guidelines for medical schools: Report I of the medical school objectives project.Academic Medicine74(1), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, S. P., & Kalishman, S. (Eds.) (1998). Issues and strategies for reform in medical education: Lessons from eight medical schools.Academic Medicine73(9), Sept. Suppl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, S. P., & Martinez-Burrola, N. (1985).Cost of Problem-based Learning.Chapter II in A. Kaufman (Ed.)Implementing problem-based medical education: lessons from successful innovations.New York:Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, S. P., Friedman, M., Skipper, B., Kalishman, S.&Snyder, J. (1993). Performances on the NBME 1, II, and III by medical students in the problem-based learning and conventional tracks at the University of New Mexico.Academic Medicine68(8), 616–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, S. P., Kalishman, S., Friedman, M., Pathak, D., & Snyder, J. (1996). A survey of graduates in practice from the University of New Mexico’s conventional and community-oriented, problem-based tracks.Academic Medicine71(10), 1079–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. T., Block, S. D., Style, C. B., & Mitchell, R. (1994). The influence of the New Pathway curriculum on Harvard medical students. Academic Medicine. 69(12)983–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods2“ded. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1997).Utilization focussed Evaluation2“ded. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T. J., Rosenblatt, R. A., Schaad, D. C., & Cullen, T. J. (1999). The long-term effect of an innovative family physician curricular pathway on the specialty and location of graduates of the University of Washington. Academic Medicine 74(3)285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, H. K., Veloski, J. J., Aber, R. C., Adler, S., Ferretti, S. M., Kelliher, G. J., Mochen, E., Morrison, G., Rattner, S. L., Sterling, G., Robeson, M. R., Hojat, M., & Xu, G. (1999). A statewide-system to track medical students’ careers: the Pennsylvania model.Academic Medicine74(Suppl 1), S112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick, R. K., Blackmore, D., Dauphinee, W. D., Rothman, A. I., & Smee, S. (1996). Large-scale high-stakes testing with an OSCE Report from the Medical Council of CanadaAcademic Medicine 71(1)S19–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A. I., Blackmore, D. E., Dauphinee, W. D., & Reznick, R. (1997). Tests of sequential testing in two years’ results of Part 2 of the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination.Academic Medicine 72(10Suppl.l), S22–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G., Machiels-Bongaerts, M., Hermans, H., Ten Cate, Th. J., Venekamp, R., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1996). The development of diagnostic competence: comparison of a problem-based, an integrated and a conventional medical curriculum.Academic Medicine71(6), 658–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuwirth, L. W. T., Verhoeven, B. H., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., Mom, E. M. A., Cohen-Schotanus, J., Van Rossum, H. J. M., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1999). An inter-and intra-university comparison with short case-based testing.Advances in Health Sciences Education 4(3), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster, A. L., & Reynolds, R. C. (1998). Medical education: Can we do better?Academic Medicine73(Suppl 9), Sv-Svi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. F. (1989).Evaluability assessment: a practical approach.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, B. H., Verwijnen, G. M., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., Holdrinet, R. S. G., Oeseburg, B., Bulte, J. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1998). An analysis of progress test results of PBL and non-PBL students.Medical Teacher20(4), 310–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosti, K. L., & Jacobs, C. D. (1999). Outcome measurement in postgraduate year one of graduates from a medical school with a pass/fail grading system.Academic Medicine74(5), 547–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1998).Evaluation2“ded. Toronto, ON: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissert, C. S. (1999). Medical schools and state legislatures as partners in a changing policy world.Academic Medicine74(2), 95–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissert, C. S., & Silberman, S. L. (1998) Sending a policy signal: state legislatures, medical schools, and primary care mandates.Journal of Health Politics Policy Law 23(5)743–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J. S. (1977). Evaluability assessment. In L. Rutman (Ed.)Evaluation research methods: basic guide(pp. 41–56). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. G. (1993). Use of NBME and USMLE examinations to evaluate medical education programs.Academic Medicine68(10), 748–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C. A. (1984). Assessing the relationship between medical education and subsequent performance.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education9, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C. A. (1989). The effects of the innovations in medical education at McMaster: a report on follow-up studies.Medicus2(3), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C. A. (1990). Developing a research agenda on career choice in medicine: a commentary.Teaching and Learning in Medicine2(3), 139–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C. A., & Ferrier, B. M. (1982). Perspectives of graduates two and five years after graduation from a three-year medical school.Journal of Medical Education 57294–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C. A., Ferrier, B. M., Cohen, M., & Goldsmith, C. (1990). A comparison of the practice patterns of general practitioners and family physicians graduating from McMaster University and other Ontario medical schools.Teaching and Learning in Medicine2(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, G., & Veloski, J. J. (1991). A comparison of Jefferson Medical College graduates who chose emergency medicine with those who chose other specialities.Academic Medicine66(6), 366–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodward, C.A. (2002). Program Evaluation. In: Norman, G.R., et al. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3904-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0462-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics