Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual Differences in Cognitive Style, Learning Style and Instructional Preference in Medical Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Research in Medical Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 7))

Summary

In medical education the debate about the utility and application of learning styles has gone on with considerable acrimony for some decades. Beginning in the 1970s there have been two principal areas of interest about learning styles within medical education: to improve educational efficiency at undergraduate, post-graduate and continuing professional education levels, and secondly, to predict career or specialty choice. Two theoretical and investigative tracks have become established. The North American work comes from the traditions of individual differences in cognition, while the European and Australian investigators have pursued consistent differences in studying style as indicative of motivational differences. The first approach has direct bearing on specialty selection and student mentoring; the second on course structure and reward articulation. This chapter will review the theoretical positions and findings of both streams as applied to mastery in medical education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aragon, S. R. (1996). The development of a conceptual framework of learning for Native American adult learners in a formal educational environment. Doctoral thesis: Training and Learning Technologies, The University of New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, A. M. (1993). Cognitive-style differences in testing situations.Educational Measurement: Issues and PracticeFall, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1993). A cultural ecology of cognition. Paper presented at the First Spearman Seminar, University of Plymouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987).Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer, T. (2000). Uneasy alliance: clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.New England Journal of Medicine342(20), 1539–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971).Abilities: their structure growth and action.New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, C. R. (1985). Differences between conventional and problem-based curricula in their students’ approaches to studyingMedical Education 19308–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning style theory and constructs. In L. Curry (Ed.)Learning style in continuing medical education(pp. 115–131). Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. (1984). Do family physicians differ from specialists? A particular case in CME patterns.Canadian Family Physician 302405–2410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry L. (1987).Integrating concepts of cognitive or learning style: a review with attention to psychometric standards.(The Curry Report) The Learning Styles Network, Centre for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles. Jamaica, New York: St. John’s University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. (1991). Patterns of learning style across selected medical specialties.British Journal of Educational Psychology11(3/4), 247–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. (1999). Cognitive and learning styles in medical education.Academic Medicine74(4), 409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L. (2000). Review of learning style, studying approach and instructional preference research in medical education. In R. Riding, & S. Rayner (Eds.)International perspectives on individual differences(pp. 239–276). Stamford, Connecticut: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, L., & Putnam, R. W. (1981). Continuing medical education in Maritime Canada: the methods physicians use, would prefer and find most effective.Canadian Medical Association Journal124(5), 563–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. M., Rutledge, C. M., & Davies, T. C. (1997). The impact of student learning styles on interviewing skills and academic performance.Teaching and Learning in Medicine9(2), 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. K., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., Dauphinee, D., McAvoy, P. A., Alexander, D. A., Coles, C., Donaldson, M., Hoftvedt, B. O., Wakeford, R., & Warren, V. J. (1990). Medical career choice: current status of research literature.Teaching and Learning in Medicine2(3), 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910).How we think(out of print) (1933) reprinted Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978).Teaching students through their individual learning styles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1989).Learning Style Inventory (LSI): an inventory for the identification of how individuals in grades 3 through 12 prefer to learn.Lawrence, Kansas: Price Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1981).Styles of learning and teaching.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, M., Saffran, B., Stinson, T. J., Nelson, W., & Bennett, C. L. (1999). Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology.Journal of the American Medical Association 2821453–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, C. P., & Slan, L. S. (1988). New results relating the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and medical specialty choice.Journal of Medical Education 63325–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, C. P., & Stritter, F. T. (1976). An empirical inventory comparing instructional preferences of medical and other professional students. InProceedings of the 15 th Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education(pp. 85–90). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. W. (1953). Cognitive styles in categorizing behavior.Journal of Personality 22214–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, D. R., Oltman, P. K., Friedman, F., Moore, C. A., & Witkin, H. A. (1979). Cognitive styles in the development of medical careers.Journal of Vocational Behavior 14341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. E., Payne, D. A., & Lewis, L. A. (1981). Prediction of basic science learning outcomes with cognitive styles and traditional admissions criteria.Journal of Medical Education 56137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E., & Schroder, H. M. (1961).Conceptual systems and personality organization.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilliard, R. I. (1995). How do medical students learn: medical student learning styles and factors that affect those learning styles.Teaching and Learning in Medicine7(4), 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewett, L. S., Greenberg, L. W., Foley, R. P., Goldberg, R. M., Spiegel, C. J., & Green, C. (1987). Another look at career choice and learning preferences.Medical Education 21244–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993).Handbook of individual differences learning and instruction.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1965). Impulsive and reflective children: significance of conceptual tempo. In J. Krumboltz (Ed.)Learning and the educational process(pp. 133–161). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., & Kogan, N. (1970). Individual variation in cognitive processes. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.)Carmichael’s manual of child psychologyVol. 1 (pp. 1273–1365). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. S. (1958). Cognitive control and motivation. In G. Lindzey (Ed.)Assessment of human motives(pp. 87–118). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1971). Individual learning styles and the learning process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1985). Learning style inventory and technical manual. Boston: McBer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahtinen, V. (now Slotte, V), Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1997). Spontaneous study strategies and the quality of knowledge construction.British Journal of Educational Psychology 6713–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiden, L. I., Crosby, R. D., & Follmer, H. (1990). Assessing learning style inventories and how well they predict academic performance.Academic Medicine65(6), 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, B. S., & Zeppa, (1980). How do prospective surgeons learn?Journal of Surgical Research 28479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C.&Kylloren, P. (1981). The field dependence-independence construct: some, one or none.Journal of Educational Psychology73, 874–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K, & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996), Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology.Higher Education 315–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, T. G., Woefl, N. N., Steele, D. J., & Hanssen, C. S. (1998). Learning/style influences student examination performance.American Journal of Surgery 176(July), 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mårtenson, D. F. (1986). Students’ approaches to studying in four medical schools.Medical Education 20532–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and process.British Journal of Educational Psychology 464–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F.&Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: II. Outcomes as a function of the learner’s conception of the task.British Journal of Educational Psychology 46115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melear, C. T. (1989). Cognitive processes in the Curry learning style framework as measured by the learning style profile and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among non-majors in college biology. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, I. C., Richards, P., Winder, B. C., & Sproston, K. A.. (1998). Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning styles in medical students: prospective study.British Medical Journal 316345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1978).Psychology.New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missler, R. A. (1986). Analytic and synthetic cognitive functioning: a critical review of evidence bearing on field dependence.Journal of Research in Personality 201–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Pham, B., & Jones, A. (1998). Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Lancet 352609–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Harvey, R.&Keeves, J. P. (1994). Students ’ learning processes and progress in higher education. Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. (1962).Manual: the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. (1974).Relevance of type to medical education. Gainesville, FL: Centre for Application of Psychological Type.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newble, D. I.&Entwistle, N. J. (1986). Learning style and approaches: implications for medical education.Medical Education 20162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newble, D. I., & Gordon, M. I. (1985). The learning style of medical students.Medical Education 193–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, M. J. (1982). NBME Part I examination: possible explanations for performance based on personality type.Journal of Medical Education57, 868–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascaul-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field-dependence-independence. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.)Cognitive style and cognitive development(pp. 36–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning.British Journal of Educational Psychology 46128–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S., Bojanczyk, M., & Lanphear, J. H. (1994). Learning preferences of medical students.Medical Education 28180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, D. (1959). The structure of psychoanalytic theory: a systematizing attempt. In S. Koch (Ed.)Psychology: a study of a science - formulations of the person and the social context(Vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezler, A. G., & Rezmovic, V. (1981). The learning preference inventory.Journal of Allied Health19(1), 2834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechmann, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning styles scales instrument.Journal of Psychology 87213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. J., & Rayner S. G. (Eds.). (2000).International perspectives on individual differences.Stamford, Connecticut: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, I. M. (1996). An analysis of learning style constructs and the development of a learning style profile of Hispanic adult learners. Doctoral thesis: Education Faculty, The University of New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, I. M., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1998). Understanding and supporting the culturally diverse distance learner. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.)Distance learners in higher education(pp. 47–64). Madison, Wisconsin: Atwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Strategies and styles of learning: an integration of varied perspectives. In R.R. Schmeck (Ed.)Learning strategies and learning styles(pp. 317–347). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R. (2000). Thoughtful learners: students who engage in deep and elaborative information processing. In R. J. Riding & S. G. Rayner (Eds)International perspectives on individual differences(pp. 79–98). Stamford, Connecticut: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, N., Smith, D. U., & Rosenberg, I. K. (1981). Cognitive style and instructional materials for medical students.Journal of Medical Education 56565–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, S., & Shipman, V. C. (1985), Cognitive styles: some conceptual, methodological and applied issues. In E.W. Gordon (Ed.)Review of Educational Research(pp. 229–291).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotte, V.&Lonka, K. (1999). Spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts. InSpontaneous study strategies promoting knowledge construction: evidence from admission tests for medical school and health-care studies(pp. 85–102). Helsinki: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobral, D. T. (1995). Diagnostic ability of medical students in relation to their learning characteristics and pre-clinical background.Medical Education29, 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelfox, H. T., Chua, G., Rourke, K., & Detsky, A. S. (1998). Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists.New England Journal of Medicine338(2), 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell, N. A., Wallick, M. M., Thal, S. E., & Burleson, J. A. (2000). Myers-Briggs type and medical speciality choice: a new look at an old question.Teaching and Learning in Medicine12(1), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamaoka, K. (1986). An assessment of congruence between learning styles of Cree, Dene, Metis and nonnative students and instructional styles of native and non-native teachers in select northern Saskatchewan schools. Masters thesis: Indian and Northern Education Program, University of Saskatchewan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, N. E., Bohlmeyer, E. M., Dickson, L. A., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1990). Spontaneous and imposed study tactics in learning prose.Journal of Experimental Education 58111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1944).A factorial study of perception. Psychometric Monograph No. 4.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooth, D., Tonge, K.&McManus, I. C. (1989). Anxiety and study methods in pre-clinical students: causal relation to examination performance.Medical Education 23416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twichell, E. D., Wile, M. Z., & Plovnick, M. (1983). Review of Applications of Learning Style Research. In L. Curry (Ed.)Learning Style in Continuing Medical Education(pp. 54–65). Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, C. N. V. (1979). Medical students’ learning processes and their relation to test performance and attitudes towards item formats.Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education(pp. 311–316). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, C. N. V., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Lacombe, G. (1998). Medical students’ learning processes: a comparative and longitudinal study.Academic Medicine 73(10)Supplement, S25–S27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, S., & Demick J. (Eds.). (1991)Field dependence-independence: cognitive style across the life span.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.)Handbook of Research on Teaching(3`a ed., pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications.Review of Educational Research47, 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, R., & Gjerde, C. L. (1978). Another look at the learning style inventory and medical career choice.Journal of Medical Education53, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CurryCorp, USA

    Lynn Curry

Authors
  1. Lynn Curry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. McMaster University, Canada

    Geoff R. Norman

  2. University of Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Cees P. M. van der Vleuten  & Diana H. J. M. Dolmans  & 

  3. University of Sheffield, UK

    David I. Newble

  4. Dalhousie University, Canada

    Karen V. Mann

  5. University of Toronto, Canada

    Arthur Rothman

  6. CurryCorp, Canada

    Lynn Curry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Curry, L. (2002). Individual Differences in Cognitive Style, Learning Style and Instructional Preference in Medical Education. In: Norman, G.R., et al. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0462-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3904-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0462-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation