Abstract
The most profound investigation of the anorectal development was performed by Aigner et al. on 79 fetuses from the ninth week on postconceptionem [1]. According to their results during the early prenatal life, the muscular layers of the rectum and of the anal canal derive from the mesenchyme that accompanies the endodermal part of the anorectum. The inner circular layer of the rectum precedes the outer longitudinal layer during the seventh week of embryonic development. The anlagen of the levator muscle and the external sphincter occur within the surrounding mesenchymae. They are clearly separated from each other and they both show the signs of proliferative activity when they get in contact with the bundles of the smooth muscles deriving from the outer longitudinal layer of the rectal wall. As a result both the levator ani and the external sphincter grow larger and get in contact (Fig. 1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigner F, Trieb T, Öffner D, et al (2007) Anatomical considerations in TNM staging and therapeutical procedures for low rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22: 1339–1346
Greene FL, Compton CC, Fritz AG, et al (eds) (2006) AJCC Cancer staging atlas. Springer, New York
Sternberg SS (1997) Histology for pathologists, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, New York
Grey’s Anatomy, 39th edn. Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2005
Morgan CN, Thompson HR (1956) Surgical anatomy of the anal canal with special reference to the surgical importance of the internal sphincter and conjoint longitudinal muscle. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 19(2): 88–114
Macchi V, Pozionato A, Stecco C, et al (2008) Histo-tophographic study of the longitudinal anal muscle. Clin Anat 21: 447–452
Ross MH, Pawilna W (2011) Histology. A text and atlas with correlated cell and molecular biology, 6th edn.Wolters Cluver/ LippincottWilliams & Williams, Philadelphia, Baltimore, NewYork, London, Buenos Aires, HongKong, Sydney, Tokyo
Shafik A, Gamal el-Din MA, el-Bagoury EM, et al (1990) Anewconcept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. The involuntary action of the external anal sphincter: histologic study. Acta Anat (Basel) 138: 359–363
Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2005) The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15: 1184–1191
Bernstein TE, Endreseth BH, Romundstad P, et al (2009) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96: 1348
Raftopoulos I, Reed JF, Bergamachi R: Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominopeineal resection for rectal cancer. Colorect Dis “Accepted Article”; doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02626.x
Wittekind C, Compton C, Quirke P, et al (2009) A uniform residual tumor R classification. Integration of the R classification and the circumferential margin. Cancer 115: 3483–3488
Verhage RJJ, Zandvoort HJA, ten Kate FJW, et al (2011) How to define a positive circumferential resectio margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol 35: 919–926
Tot T (2005) Colorectal tumors: Atlas of the large section histopathology. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York
Valentini V, Aristei C, Glimelius B, et al (2009) Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Management: 2nd European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2). Radiother Oncol 92: 148–163
AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook, 7th edn. Springer; 2010
Shirouzu K, Ogata Y (2009) Histopathological tumor spread in very lowrectal cancer treated with abdominopeineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 52: 1887–1894
Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, et al (2005) Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1858–1865
Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T, et al (2007) Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 246: 916–921
Kuo LJ, Hung CS, Wu CH, et al (2011) Ocological and functional outcomes of interspincteric resection for low rectal cancer. J Surg Res 170: 93–98
Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, et al (2008) Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma: Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 15: 2668–2676
da Silva GM, Berho M, Wexner SD, et al (2003) Histologic analysis of the irradiated sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1492–1497
Gervaz PA, Wexner SD, Pemberton JH (2002) Pelvic irradiation and anorectal function: Introducing the concept of sphincter-preserving radiation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 195: 387–394
Gervaz PA, Henning R, Buechler M, et al (2003) Longterm expression of fibrogenic cytokines in irradiationinduced damage to the internal anal sphincter. Swiss Surg 9: 193–197
Nishizawa Y, Fujii S, Saito N, et al (2011) The association between anal function and neural degeneration after preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by intersphincteric resection. Dis Colon Rect 54: 1423–1429
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bogner, B. (2012). The pathological assessment of the surgical specimens originating from the lower rectum and anal canal. In: Schiessel, R., Metzger, P. (eds) Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Tumors. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0929-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0929-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0928-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0929-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)