Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisationale Gerechtigkeit, Demokratie, Subjektivierung und Gesundheit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fehlzeiten-Report 2020

Part of the book series: Fehlzeiten-Report ((FEHLREPORT,volume 2020))

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag entwickelt eine Bestandsaufnahme der angewandten psychologischen Forschung zur organisationalen Gerechtigkeit mit Bezügen zu demokratischen Organisationsstrukturen und arbeitsbezogener Gesundheit. Zuerst wird die etablierte Konzeptualisierung von organisationaler Gerechtigkeit und ihren Komponenten vorgestellt. Danach wird auf Verbindungen zwischen struktureller organisationaler Demokratie und Gerechtigkeit sowie auf Bezüge zum soziomoralischen Organisationsklima eingegangen. Nach einem Überblick zu den Folgen organisationaler Gerechtigkeit für arbeitsbezogene Gesundheit werden abschließend Gerechtigkeitsimplikationen organisationaler Individualisierung diskutiert. Aufgezeigt werden Probleme einer stark subjektivierten Betrachtung sowie die Notwendigkeit, durch partizipative und demokratische Ansätze organisationale Strukturen zu schaffen, die gerechte Handlungsweisen und ein gerechtigkeitsbewusstes soziales Klima ermöglichen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L (Hrsg) Advances in experimental social psychology, Bd. 2. Academic Press, New York, S 267–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Adm Sci Q 41(1):61–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen LPS, Hogh A, Andersen JH et al (2019) Depressive symptoms following work-related violence and threats and the modifying effect of organizational justice, social support, and safety perceptions. J Interpers Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519831386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2016) Intellectual failure and ideological success in organization studies: the case of transformational leadership. J Manag Inq 25(2):139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal PM, Hornung S (2019) Individualization of work: From psychological contracts to ideological deals. In: Griep Y, Cooper CL (Hrsg) Handbook of research on the psychological contract at work. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, S 143–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard-Oettel C, Eib C, Griep Y et al (2019) How do job insecurity and organizational justice relate to depressive symptoms and sleep difficulties: a multilevel study on immediate and prolonged effects in Swedish workers. Appl Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet V, Magista V, Perret V (2013) Stop filling in the gaps! Rethinking organizational justice through problematization. 22ème Conférence AIMS, Clermont-Ferrand, Jun 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE (2001) The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 86(2):278–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol 86(3):386–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA (2012) Organizational justice. In: Kozlowski SWJ (Hrsg) The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology, Bd. 1. Oxford University Press, New York, S 526–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ et al (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86(3):425–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Rodell JB et al (2013) Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. J Appl Psychol 98(2):199–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Correia I, Vala J (2003) When will a victim be secondarily victimized? The effect of observer’s belief in a just world, victim’s innocence and persistence of suffering. Soc Justice Res 16(4):379–400

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dierendonck D (2011) Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. J Manage 37(4):1228–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Linna A et al (2010) Does organisational justice protect from sickness absence following a major life event? A Finnish public sector study. J Epidemiol Community Health 64(5):470–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fassina NE, Jones DA, Uggerslev KL (2008) Meta-analytic tests of relationships between organizational justice and citizenship behavior: testing agent-system and shared-variance models. J Organ Behav 29(6):805–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M (2008) Perspectives on organizational justice: concept clarification, social context integration, time and links with morality. Int J Manag Rev 10(2):93–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Goppel A, Mieth C, Neuhäuser C (Hrsg) (2016) Handbuch Gerechtigkeit. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould CC (2020) Diversity beyond non-discrimination: from structural injustices to participatory institutions. In: Lütge C, Lütge C, Faltermeier M (Hrsg) The praxis of diversity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, S 15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Graso M, Camps J, Strah N et al (2019) Organizational justice enactment: an agent-focused review and path forward. J Vocat Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Folger RG (1983) Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In: Paulus PB (Hrsg) Basic group processes. Springer, New York, S 235–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1981) Die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd.1 und Bd.2. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben JR, Buckley MR (2004) Burnout in organizational life. J Manage 30(6):859–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann E (2001) Confrontations and compromise: dispute resolution at a worker cooperative coal mine. Law Social Inq 26(3):555–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Höge T, Weber WG (2018) Das soziomoralische Organisationsklima und Sinnerfüllung in der Arbeit: Erkenntnisse über zwei Gesundheitsressourcen. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H et al (Hrsg) Fehlzeiten-Report 2018. Sinn erleben - Arbeit und Gesundheit. Springer, Berlin, S 225–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung S, Doenz R, Glaser J (2016) Exploring employee attitudes on fairness of idiosyncratic deals. Organisational Stud Innov Rev 2(4):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung S, Höge T (2019) Humanization, rationalization or subjectification of work? Employee-oriented flexibility between i-deals and ideology in the neoliberal era. Bus Manag Studies: Int J 7(5):3090–3119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung S, Rousseau DM (2012) Psychological contracts of Chinese employees. In: Huang X, Bond MH (Hrsg) Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research, and practice. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, S 326–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JL, Cropanzano R, Li A et al (2017) Employee conscientiousness, agreeableness, and supervisor justice rule compliance: a three-study investigation. J Appl Psychol 102(11):1564–1589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston CS, Krings F, Maggiori C et al (2016) Believing in a personal just world helps maintain well-being at work by coloring organizational justice perceptions. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 25(6):945–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost JT (2019) A quarter century of system justification theory: questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. Br J Soc Psychol 58(2):263–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Karam EP, Hu J, Davison RB et al (2019) Illuminating the ‘face’of justice: a meta-analytic examination of leadership and organizational justice. J Manage Stud 56(1):134–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M et al (2007) Effort-reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: complementary or redundant models? Occup Environ Med 64(10):659–665

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal GS (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R (Hrsg) Social exchange: advances in theory and research. Plenum, New York, S 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Manville C, Akremi AE, Niezborala M et al (2016) Injustice hurts, literally: the role of sleep and emotional exhaustion in the relationship between organizational justice and musculoskeletal disorders. Hum Relat 69(6):1315–1339

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier GW, Streicher B, Jonas E et al (2007) Gerechtigkeitseinschätzungen in Organisationen. Diagnostica 53(2):97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Credner A, Muschalla B (2019) Kann Ungerechtigkeit bei der Arbeit krank machen? Grundannahmen, subjektive Wahrnehmung und Person-Job-Fit. Verhaltenstherapie. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldaschl M, Voß GG (2002) Subjektivierung von Arbeit. Hampp, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndjaboué R, Brisson C, Vézina M (2012) Organisational justice and mental health: a systematic review of prospective studies. Occup Environ Med 69(10):694–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterreich R, Leitner K, Resch M (2000) Analyse psychischer Anforderungen und Belastungen in der Produktionsarbeit: Das Verfahren RHIA-VERA-Produktion – Handbuch. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérotin V (2016) What do we really know about workers’ co-operatives? In: Webster A, Shaw LM, Vorberg-Rugh R (Hrsg) Mainstreaming co-operation: An alternative for the twenty-first century? Manchester University Press, Manchester, S 239–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Peutere L, Ojala S, Lipiäinen L et al (2019) Relational justice, economic fluctuations, and long-term sickness absence: a multicohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health 45(4):413–420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pircher Verdorfer A, Weber WG, Unterrainer C, Seyr S (2013) The relationship between organizational democracy and socio-moral climate: exploring effects of the ethical context in organizations. Econ Ind Democr 34(3):423–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Pircher Verdorfer A, Steinheider B, Burkus D (2015) Exploring the socio-moral climate in organizations: an empirical examination of determinants, consequences, and mediating mechanisms. J Bus Ethics 132(1):233–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins JM, Ford MT, Tetrick LE (2012) Perceived unfairness and employee health: a meta-analytic integration. J Appl Psychol 97(2):235–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman LA, Saud LH (2020) Justifying social inequalities: the role of social darwinism. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 46(7):1139–1155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell R (1984) The role of culture and ethnicity in the degeneration of democratic firms. Econ Ind Democr 5(1):73–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid BE (2009) Beteiligungsorientierung in Unternehmen. Eine Studie zum Einfluss von partizipativen Strukturen und Verfahren auf die psychologische Bindung von Unternehmensmitgliedern. Innsbruck University Press, Innsbruck

    Google Scholar 

  • Schophaus M (2019) Organisationale Demokratie – Wie Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Organisationen partizipieren. In: Porsch T, Werdes B (Hrsg) Verwaltungspsychologie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studiengänge der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Hogrefe, Göttingen, S 289–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott BA, Colquitt JA, Zapata-Phelan CP (2007) Justice as a dependent variable: subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions. J Appl Psychol 92(6):1597–1609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobering K (2016) Producing and reducing gender inequality in a worker-recovered cooperative. Sociol Q 57(1):129–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Spell CS, Arnold TJ (2007) A multi-level analysis of organizational justice climate, structure, and employee mental health. J Manage 33(5):724–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Strecker C, Brenner M, Rapp M et al (2020) Verfahren zur Beobachtung des Soziomoralischen Klimas (SMK-B). Manual für Forschung und Anwendung. Innsbruck University Press, Innsbruck

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab AG, Takeuchi R, Taylor MS (2005) Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Acad Manage J 48(1):146–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper BJ (2001) Health consequences of organizational injustice: tests of main and interactive effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 86(2):197–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JP, Whitman DS, Viswesvaran C (2010) Employee proactivity in organizations: a comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. J Occup Organ Psychol 83(2):275–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Unterrainer C, Palgi M, Weber WG et al (2011) Structurally anchored organizational democracy: does it reach the employee? J Pers Psychol 10(3):118–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vegchel N, De Jonge J, Bosma H et al (2005) Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 60(5):1117–1131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran C, Ones DS (2002) Examining the construct of organizational justice: a meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. J Bus Ethics 38(3):193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber WG (1999) Organisationale Demokratie. Anregungen für innovative Arbeitsformen jenseits blosser Partizipation? Z Arb Wiss 53(4):270–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber WG, Unterrainer C, Höge T (2008) Sociomoral atmosphere and prosocial and democratic value orientations in enterprises with different levels of structurally anchored participation. Ger J Hum Resour Manag 22(2):171–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber WG, Unterrainer C, Schmid BE (2009) The influence of organizational democracy on employees’ socio-moral climate and prosocial behavioral orientations. J Organ Behav 30(8):1127–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber WG, Unterrainer C, Höge T (2020) Psychological research on organizational democracy: A meta-analysis of individual, organizational, and societal outcomes. Appl Psych. 69(3): 1009–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman DS, Caleo S, Carpenter NC et al (2012) Fairness at the collective level: a meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. J Appl Psychol 97(4):776–791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wuestewald T (2012) The structural relationships among employee participation, socio-moral climate, engagement, and civic attitudes in a police context. Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University, Norman (unpublished PhD thesis)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, FG Angewandte Psychologie, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich

    PD Dr. Severin Hornung, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang G. Weber & PD Dr. Thomas Höge

Authors
  1. PD Dr. Severin Hornung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Wolfgang G. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. PD Dr. Thomas Höge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Severin Hornung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Bernhard Badura

  2. Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Beuth Hochschule für Technik, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Antje Ducki

  3. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Helmut Schröder

  4. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Joachim Klose

  5. Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Markus Meyer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hornung, S., Weber, W.G., Höge, T. (2020). Organisationale Gerechtigkeit, Demokratie, Subjektivierung und Gesundheit. In: Badura, B., Ducki, A., Schröder, H., Klose, J., Meyer, M. (eds) Fehlzeiten-Report 2020. Fehlzeiten-Report, vol 2020. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61524-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61524-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61523-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61524-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation