Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment von Schmerz in der physikalischen Praxis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kompendium Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation

  • 6137 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das evidenzbasierte Schmerzassessment im Sonderfach Physikalische und Allgemeine Rehabilitation ist ein wesentlicher Schritt in der Patientenversorgung. Hierbei spielt die Schmerzevaluierung in Zusammenhang mit Störung des Gesundheitszustandes, der funktionellen Einschränkungen mit Verschlechterung der Lebensqualität eine wichtige Rolle. In diesem Kapitel werden der klinische Untersuchungsgang und exemplarische Scores sowie Fragebögen zur Schmerzmessung skizziert. Evidenzbasierte Grundpfeiler des Assessments bei Schmerzpatienten stellen primär die Anamnese (inkl. Schmerzanamnese) und körperliche Untersuchung dar. Diese können durch Anwendung von Skalen und Fragebögen zwecks genauerer Evaluierung mit dem Ziel der Erstellung eines individuell angepassten Therapieplans gut ergänzt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (2011) Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie (NVL) Kreuzschmerz. Version Version 1.2. http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/themen/kreuzschmerz/pdf/nvl_kreuzschmerz_lang.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. Jan. 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J, Dobos GJ, Michalsen A (2014) Validation of the German version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:91

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cuperus N, Mahler EA, Vliet Vlieland TP et al (2015) Measurement properties of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index for generalized osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:821–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devillé WL, Windt DA van der, Dzaferagić A et al (2000) The test of Lasègue: systematic review of the accuracy in diagnosing herniated discs. Spine 25(9):1140–1147 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devillé WL, Windt DA van der, Dzaferagić A, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM (2000) Spine 25(9):1140–1147 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downie A, Williams CM, Henschke N et al (2014) Red flags to screen for malignancy and fracture in patients with low back pain. Br J Sports Med 48:1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egle UT (2003) Handbuch chronischer Schmerz: Grundlagen, Pathogenese, Klinik und Therapie aus bio-psycho-sozialer Sicht; mit 106 Tabellen. Schattauer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP et al (2011) Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 152:2399–2404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frettlöh J, Maier C, Gockel H et al (2003) Validität des Mainzer Stadienmodells der Schmerzchronifizierung bei unterschiedlichen Schmerzdiagnosen. Schmerz 17:240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann-Lingen C, Buss U, Snaith RP (2011) Hospital anxiety and depression scale – Deutsche Version (HADS-D), 3. Aufl. Huber, Bern (Manual)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinman RS, Dobson F, Takla A et al (2014) Which is the most useful patient-reported outcome in femoroacetabular impingement? Test-retest reliability of six questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 48:458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, Vet HCW de (2010) International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties: results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol 63:737–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keilani M, Heredy U, Hartl F, Kuderer B, Crevenna R (2014) Assessment in der Physikalischen Medizin und Rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehab Kuror 24:266–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmann T, Raspe H (1996) Hannover Functional Questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 35:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Maigne JY, Chantelot F, Chatellier G (2009) Interexaminer agreement of clinical examination of the neck manual medicine. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 52:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manna A, Sarkar SK, Khanra LK (2015) PA1 An internal audit into the adequacy of pain assessment in a hospice setting. BMJ Support Palliat Care 5(Suppl 1):A19–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maurischat C, Härter M, Auclair P et al (2002) Preliminary validation of a German version of pain stages of change questionnaire. Eur J Pain 6:43–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ et al (2011) Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (″yellow flags″) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther 91:737–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Offenbacher M, Ewert T, Sangha O et al (2003) Validation of a German version of the ’Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand’ questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 62:168–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osthus H, Cziske R, Jacobi E (2006) Cross-cultural adaptation of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index and evaluation of its measurement properties. Spine 31:E448–E453 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfingsten M, Kröner-Herwig B, Leibing E et al (2000) Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Eur J Pain 4:259–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson HS, Brox JI, Robinson R et al (2007) The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint. Man Ther 12:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson HS, Mengshoel AM (2014) Assessments of lumbar flexion range of motion: intertester reliability and concurrent validity of 2 commonly used clinical tests. Spine 39(4):E270–E275 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rocourt MH, Radlinger L, Kalberer F et al (2008) Evaluation of intratester and intertester reliability of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:364–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seffinger MA, Najm WI, Mishra SI et al (2004) Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. Spine 29:E413–25 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stucki G, Meier D, Stucki S et al (1996) Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMasters Universities) Arthrosis Index. Z Rheumatol 55:40–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T et al (2006) Chapter 3. European guidelines for the managment of acute non specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 15(suppl 2):169–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1997) Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine 22:2128–2156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2001) List of Official ICD-10 Updates. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). WHO, Genf. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en. Zugegriffen: 20. Jan. 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, Ebnbicher G, Wölfl G, Fialka-Moser V (1999) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine 24:1099–1103 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsklinik für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, 1090, Wien, Österreich

    OA Dr. Mohammad Keilani MSc

  2. Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Wealthy St. SE 235, 49503, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA

    Prof. Dr. Andrew Haig

  3. Universitätsklinik für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, 1090, Wien, Österreich

    Prof. Dr. Richard Crevenna MBA, MSc

Authors
  1. OA Dr. Mohammad Keilani MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Andrew Haig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. Richard Crevenna MBA, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Keilani MSc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Univ.-Klinik für Physikalische Medizin u. Rehabilitation, Medizinische Universität Wien Physikalische Medizin u. Rehabilitation, Wien, Austria

    Richard Crevenna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keilani, M., Haig, A., Crevenna, R. (2017). Assessment von Schmerz in der physikalischen Praxis. In: Crevenna, R. (eds) Kompendium Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49035-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49035-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49034-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49035-8

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation