Abstract
Endourologic techniques, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and shockwave lithotripsy have become commonplace tools for urologists in the treatment of stone disease. The ease, efficacy, and safety of these techniques have minimized open surgical techniques. Although highly effective, the morbidity of the incision made open surgery impractical in most situations. In similar fashion, laparoscopy and robotics have revolutionized urologic surgery and are allowing the field to push the limits and indications of minimally invasive surgery. High quality of evidence is still lacking when discussing laparoscopic/robotic stone surgery. Primary stone surgery using laparoscopic/robotic techniques may be indicated in situations of anatomic abnormalities (e.g., horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidneys), concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair, diverticular stones, severe obesity, or multiple failed endourologic treatments. If laparoscopic techniques can maintain similar results to the open surgical approaches while minimizing the morbidity, it will inevitably have a larger role in the treatment of stones and should be considered as an adjunct to open surgery in the aforementioned situations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Hunayan A, Khalil M et al (2011) Management of solitary renal pelvic stone: laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 25(6):975–978
Almeida G, Heldwein FL, Graziotin TM, Schmitt CS, Teloken C (2009) A prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones. Actas Urol Esp 33(10):1108–1114
Badalato G, Hemal AK, Menon M, Badani KK (2009) Current role of robot-assisted pyelolithotomy for the management of large renal calculi: a contemporary analysis. J Endourol 23(10):1719–1722
Badani KK, Hemal AK et al (2006) Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol 24(2):198–201
Gaur DD, Agarwal DK et al (1994) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol 151(4):927–929
Gluckman GR, Stoller M et al (1993) Laparoscopic pyelocaliceal diverticula ablation. J Endourol 7(4):315–317
Goel A, Hemal AK (2003) Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparsion with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol 35:73–76
Hoenig D, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1997) Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a pelvic kidney: a case report and review of the literature. JSLS 1:163–165
Jarrett TW, Chan DY et al (2002) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 167(3):1253–1256
Kaouk JH, Gill IS et al (2003) Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy: feasibility study in a chronic porcine model. J Urol 169(2):691–696
Ko YH, Kang SG et al (2011) Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy as a primary modality for large proximal ureteral calculi: comparison to rigid ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(1):7–13
Lee RS, Passerotti CC et al (2007) Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol 177(6):2306–2309; discussion 2309–2310
Lusuardi L, Janetschek G (2011) Indications and outcomes of laparoscopic uretero-renal stone surgery. Curr Opin Urol 21(2):161–165
Meria P, Milcent S et al (2005) Management of pelvic stones larger than 20 mm: laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol Int 75(4):322–326
Miller S, Ng CS, Streem SB, Gill IS (2002) Laparoscopic management of caliceal diverticular calculi. J Urol 167:1248–1252
Nouralizadeh SN, Masoudi P, Soltani MH, Javaherforooshzadeh A (2010) Bilateral laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy for managing staghorn renal calculi. Urol J 7(2):133–135
Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Danesh A, Ziaee SA, Sharifiaghdas F, Tabibi A, Abdi H, Farrokhi F (2007) Laparoscopic management of ureteral calculi: a report of 123 cases. Urol J 4:138–140
Simforoosh N, Aminsharifi A et al (2008) Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy for managing large staghorn calculi. BJU Int 101(10):1293–1296
Sinha R, Sharma N (1997) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic management of urolithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 7(2):95–98
Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG et al (2010) Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review. Urol Res 38(5):337–344
Srivastava A, Singh P et al (2008) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy – is it an effective mode of treatment? Urol Int 80(3):306–309
Stein RJ, Turna B et al (2008) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy: technique and outcomes. J Endourol 22(6):1251–1255
Wagner KR, Jarrett TW (2008) Secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal calculus after failed open pyeloplasty: laparoscopic management. J Endourol 22(9):1901–1903; discussion 1905, 1907
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahmed, F., Jarrett, T.W. (2013). Laparoscopic/Robotic Stone Surgery. In: Knoll, T., Pearle, M. (eds) Clinical Management of Urolithiasis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28732-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28732-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28731-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28732-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)