Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ergebnisse der Knieendoprothetik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
AE-Manual der Endoprothetik

  • 5488 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Ergebnisse der Knieendoprothetik sind von multiplen Faktoren abhängig und können durch verschiedene Verfahren gemessen werden. Entscheidend für den Patienten sind aber die Verbesserung der Lebensqualität und eine lange Standzeit der Endoprothesen, die über das Minimum von 10 Jahren weit hinausgehen sollte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aebli N, Krebs J, Schwenke D, Hii T, Wehrli U (2004) Progression of radiolucent lines in cementless twin-bearing low-contact-stress knee prostheses: a retrospective study. J Arthroplasty 19:783–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aglietti P, Baldini A, Sensi L (2006) Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:106–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Albrektsson BE, Carlsson LV, Freeman MA, Herberts P, Ryd L (1992) Proximally cemented versus uncemented Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:233–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Assor M, Aubaniac JM (2006) Influence of rotatory malposition of femoral implant in failure of unicompartimental medial knee prosthesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:473–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA (1983) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:178–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berth A, Urbach D, Neumann W, Awiszus F (2007) Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approaches. J Arthroplasty 22:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M (2005) A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2290–2296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blauth W, Hassenpflug J (1990) Are unconstrained components essential in total knee arthroplasty? Long-term results of the Blauth knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 258:86–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm P (2003) The hinged knee prosthesis: outdated design or valuable implant for difficult cases? Zentralbl Chir 128: 64–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm P, Holy T (1998) Is there a future for hinged prostheses in primary total knee arthroplasty? A 20-year survivorship analysis of the Blauth prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:302–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnin M, Deschamps G, Neyret P, Chambat P (2000) Revision in non-infected total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 69 consecutive cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 86:694–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Mont MA (2008) Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2730–2735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne RB, Finlay JB (1986) The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:95–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briard JL, Hungerford DS (1989) Patellofemoral instability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4 (Suppl):S87–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briard JL, Witoolkollachit P, Lin G (2007) Soft tissue management in total knee replacement. Analysis of ligament balancing. Orthopäde 36:635–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett RS, Boone JL, McCarthy KP, Rosenzweig S, Barrack RL (2007) A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:65–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein AH, Wright TM (1997) Biomechanik in Orthopädie und Traumatologie. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron HU, Hunter GA (1982) Failure in total knee arthroplasty: mechanisms, revisions, and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson A, Björkman A, Besjakov J, Onsten I (2005) Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years. Acta Orthop 76:362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Châtain F, Richard A, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Neyret P (2004) Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90:49–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen AF, Alan RK, Redziniak DE, Tria AJ Jr (2006) Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement. The initial experience with results at two to four years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1448–1453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claus A, Scharf HP (2007) „Ligament balancing“ and varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopäde 36:643–644, 646–649. Review

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson PA, Rivenburgh D (2008) Focal anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: theoretic basis, surgical technique, and case reports. Orthop Clin North Am 39:337–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D (1997) Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:575–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducheyne P, Kagan A 2nd, Lacey JA (1978) Failure of total knee arthroplasty due to loosening and deformation of the tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:384–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP (1987) Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 216:151–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DA, Dierckman B, Watts MR, Davis K (2007) Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 (Suppl 2):39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gacon G, Coillard JY, Barba L, Travers V (1995) Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 81:505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gatha NM, Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (2004) Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 17:196–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill GS, Joshi AB, Mills DM (1999) Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:210–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gore DR, Murray MP, Sepic SB, Gardner GM (1986) Correlations between objective measures of function and a clinical knee rating scale following total knee replacement. Orthopedics 9:1363–1367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grassmayr MJ, Parker DA, Coolican MR, Vanwanseele B (2007) Posterior cruciate ligament deficiency: biomechanical and biological consequences and the outcomes of conservative treatment. A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport 11(5):433–443. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamoui N, Kantor S, Vince K, Crookes PF (2006) Long-term outcome of total knee replacement: does obesity matter? Obes Surg 16:35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartford JM, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, Knoblick G (1998) Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 13:380–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann AA, Tkach TK, Evanich CJ, Camargo MP (2000) Posterior stabilization in total knee arthroplasty with use of an ultracongruent polyethylene insert. J Arthroplasty 15:576–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HT, Su JY, Chang JK, Chen CH, Wang GJ (2007) The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22:1007–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:173–180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerosch J (1997) Knie-TEP-Revisionseingriffe. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura H, Bourne RB (2001) Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:248–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KT, Lee S, Park HS, Cho KH, Kim KS (2007) A prospective analysis of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30 (Suppl):15–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Ylinen P, Tallroth K, Remes V (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Miller-Galante II prosthesis: mid-term clinical and radiographic results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:617–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lädermann A, Saudan M, Riand N, Fritschy D (2008) Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical and radiological study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94:247–251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter WB (2008) Patellofemoral arthroplasty in the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis: rationale and outcomes in younger patients. Orthop Clin North Am 39:363–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li MG, Yao F, Joss B, Ioppolo J, Nivbrant B, Wood D (2006) Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee 13:365–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liebau C, Friedrich F, Becker R, Neumann HW (1998) Ist die Implantation einer unikondylären Schlittenprothese noch zeitgemäß? In: Rabenseifner J (Hrsg) Knieendoprothetik. Steinkopff, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisowski LA, Verheijen PM, Lisowski AE (2004) Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA): clinical and radiological results of minimum follow-up of 2 years. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 31:773–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi AV Jr, Berasi CC, Berend KR (2007) Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 (Suppl 1):25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg-Jensen A, Kourakis AH, Rossen B, Kofoed H (2002) Radiolucency adjacent to the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25:49–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahfouz MR, Merkl BC, Fatah EE, Booth R Jr, Argenson JN (2007) Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 10:447–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molfetta L, Caldo D (2008) Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee 15:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes FR, Matthews DS, Mooar PA, Grood ES (1983) The symptomatic anterior cruciate deficient knee. II. The results of rehabilitation, activity modification and councelling on functional disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:163–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papaloucas CD, Earnshaw P, Tonkin C, Buckland-Wright JC (2004) Quantitative radiographic assessment of cancellous bone changes in the proximal tibia after total knee arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up study. Calcif Tissue Int 74:429–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP (2001) Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 388:18–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J (2004) Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75:464–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:94–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:60–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau MA, Lazennec JY, Catonné Y (2008) Early mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:53–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Garratt AM, Coutts A, Russell IT (1994) SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient based studies. Qual Health Care 3:180–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu J, Saito S, Yamamoto K, Sano S (1993) Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 53:35–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sathappan SS, Wasserman B, Jaffe WL, Bong M, Walsh M, Di Cesare PE (2006) Midterm results of primary total knee arthroplasty using a dished polyethylene insert with a recessed or resected posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty 21:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Li G, Kozanek M, Song EK (2008) Functional comparison of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without a navigation system. Int Orthop 33:987–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shi MG, Lü HS, Guan ZP (2006) Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 44:1101–1105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sisto DJ, Sarin VK (2008) Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a customized trochlear prosthesis. Orthop Clin North Am 39:355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skowroński J, Jatskewych J, Długosz J, Skowroński R, Bielecki M (2005) The Oxford II medial unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 10-year follow-up study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 7:620–625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Naima VS, Freeman MA (1999) The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:3–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM, Kröger HP (2004) Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:600–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steckel H, Klinger HM, Baums MH, Schultz W (2005) Long-term results of the Blauth knee prosthesis–current status of hinged knee prostheses. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:30–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE (2004) Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:328–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanavalee A, Thiengwittayaporn S, Itiravivong P (2007) Progressive quadriceps incision during minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty: the effect on early postoperative ambulation. J Arthroplasty 22:1013–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tingart M, Lüring C, Bäthis H, Beckmann J, Grifka J, Perlick L (2008) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Moran MC, Insall JN (1989) Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:15–19; discussion 19–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Wang Z, Shang Y (2007) Balance of soft tissues in total knee arthroplasty for patients with knee of varus deformity and flexion contracture. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 21:1062–1066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland

    C. Lohmann, H. Meyer & W. Rüther

Authors
  1. C. Lohmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Rüther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Lohmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Klinik für Orthopädie u. Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, 53105, Germany

    Dieter C. Wirtz

Copyright information

© 2011 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endoprothetik

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lohmann, C., Meyer, H., Rüther, W. (2011). Ergebnisse der Knieendoprothetik. In: Wirtz, D. (eds) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12889-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation