Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gruppentherapieprozesse: Eine klinische Forschungsperspektive

  • Chapter
Gruppenpsychotherapie

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel wird ein forschungsbezogenes Modell für Gruppenprozesse vorgestellt, in dem zwischen der Gruppenstruktur („Anatomie der Gruppe“) und dem Gruppenprozess im engeren Sinne („Physiologie der Gruppe“) unterschieden wird. Befunde aus der Gruppentherapieprozessforschung zu beiden Bereichen werden zusammengefasst. Bezüglich der Gruppenstruktur liegen besonders verlässliche Befunde vor zur Vorbereitung, Formatierung und Zusammensetzung von Gruppen sowie zu den Aspekten Normen, Subgruppenbildung und Gruppenentwicklung. Neben Kenntnissen über basale sozialpsychologische Mechanismen, die in allen Gruppen wirken, gibt die Prozessforschung Auskunft über die Bedeutung therapeutischer Faktoren, speziell des interpersonellen Feedbacks und der Selbstöffnung, sowie zur Gruppenkohäsion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Agazarian, Y. M. (1997). Systems-centered therapy for groups. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsenian, J., Semrad, E. V., & Shapiro, D. (1982). An analysis of integral of functions in small groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 12, 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D. B. (1991). The behavioral analysis of interpersonal intimacy in group development. Small Group Research, 22, 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. P., & Lewis, C. M. (Hrsg.). (2000). The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, R., & Kaul, T. (1978). Experiential group research: Current perspectives. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2. Aufl., S. 769–816). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, R., & Kaul, T. (1994). Experiential group research: Can the canon fire? In A. E. Bergin, S. L. Garfield (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (4. Aufl., S. 631–663). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, R., & Lawlis, G. (1971). Empirical research in group psychotherapy. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (S. 812–838). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berne, E. (1966). Principles of group treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1959). Attacks on linking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 40, 308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R. (1975). Norm formation in therapy groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R. (1983). Norm regulation in therapy groups. In R. Dies & K. R. MacKenzie (Hrsg.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating theory and practice (S. 171–189). New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R. (1984). Positive and negative norm regulation and their relationship to therapy group size. Group, 8, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R., & Lieberman, M. A. (1978). Selection criteria for group therapy. In K. Brodie & P. Brady (Hrsg.), Controversy in psychiatry (S. 679–702). Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brossart, D. F., Patton, M. J., & Wood, P. K. (1998). Assessing group process: An illustration using tuckerized growth curves. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. W. (1992). Teaching group dynamics: Process and practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. W. (2003). Conceptualizing process. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 53, 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budman, S. H., Soldz, S., Demby, A., Feldstein, M., Springer, T., & Davis, S. (1989). Cohesion, alliance and outcome in group psychotherapy. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 52, 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bufe, C. Q., & DeNunzio, D. (1998). Exercises for individual and group development: Building blocks for intimacy, awareness and community. Tuscon, AZ: See Sharp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Kircher, J., & Taylor, S. (1994). Methodological considerations in group psychotherapy research: Past, present, and future practices. In A. Fuhriman & G. M. Burlingame (Hrsg.), Handbook of group psychotherapy (S. 41–80). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. E. (2002). Cohesion in group psychotherapy. In J. Norcross (Hrsg.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (S. 71–88). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. E. (2004a). Current status and future directions of group therapy research. In J. L. DeLucia-Waack, D. A. Gerrity, C. R. Kalodner & M. T. Riva (Hrsg.), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (S. 651–660). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., MacKenzie, K. R., & Strauß, B. (2004b). Small group treatment: Evidence for effectiveness and mechanisms of change. In M. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5. Aufl., S. 647–696). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Strauß, B., Joyce, A., MacNair-Semands, R., MacKenzie, K. R., Ogrodniczuk, J., & Taylor, S. M. (2006). CORE Battery – revised: An assessment tool kit for promoting optimal group selection, process and outcome. New York: AGPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, G. M., Strauß, B., & Johnson, J. E. (2008). Gibt es allgemeine Veränderungsmechanismen in Gruppenpsychotherapien? Eine Einführung in ein konzeptuelles Modell. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 44 , 177–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castonguay, L. G., Pincus, A. L., Agras, W. S., & Hines, C. E. (1998). The role of emotion in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge-eating disorder: When things have to feel worse before they get better. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsini, R. J., & Rosenberg, B. (1955). Mechanisms of group psychotherapy: Processes and dynamics. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 406–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, E., Bloch, S., & Wanlass, J. (1994). Therapeutic factors: Interpersonal and intrapersonal mechanisms. In A. Fuhriman & G. M. Burlingame (Hrsg.), Handbook of group psychotherapy: An empirical and clinical synthesis (S. 269–315). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dies, R. R. (1994). Therapist variables in group psychotherapy research. In A. Fuhriman & G. M. Burlingame (Hrsg.), Handbook of group psychotherapy: An empirical and clinical synthesis (S. 114–154). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, J. K. (1998). Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 116–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettin, M. F. (1992). Foundations and applications of group psychotherapy: A sphere of influence. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezriel, H. (1950). A psycho-analytic approach to group treatment. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 23, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezriel, H. (1959). The role of transference in psycho-analytic and other approaches to group treatment. Acta Psychotherapeutica, Psychosomatica et Orthopaedagogica, 7, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3. Aufl.). Belmont, MA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, S. H., & Anthony, E. J. (1957). Group psychotherapy; the psycho-analytic approach. Oxford: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhriman, A., & Burlingame, G. M. (1990). Consistency of matter: A comparative analysis of individual and group process variables. Counseling Psychologist, 18, 7–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhriman, A., & Burlingame, G. M. (1994). Group psychotherapy: Research and practice. In A. Fuhriman & G. M. Burlingame (Hrsg.), Handbook of group psychotherapy: An empirical and clinical synthesis (S. 3–40). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R. (1980). Toward the delineation of therapeutic change principles. American Psychologist, 35, 991–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, B. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E. (1990). Is individual therapy process really different from group therapy? The jury is still out. Counseling Psychologist, 18, 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Bruch, M. A. (1995). Dismantling cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 637–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, L. (1977). A group-centered approach to group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 27, 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., Burlingame, G. M., Strauß, B., & Bormann, B. (2008). Die therapeutischen Beziehungen in der Gruppenpsychotherapie. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 44, 52–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, T., & Bednar, R. (1986). Experiential group research: Results, questions, and suggestions. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, T., & Bednar, R. (1994). Pretraining and structure: Parallel lines yet to meet. In A. Fuhriman & G. M. Burlingame (Hrsg.), Handbook of group psychotherapy (S. 83–113). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M. (1985). Feedback in group psychotherapy: Review and implications. Small Group Behavior, 16, 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M. (1997). Leader behavior and therapeutic gain: An application of situational leadership theory. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., & Lilly, R. L. (1997). Developmental changes in group climate as they relate to therapeutic gain. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 208–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., & Mullison, D. (1988). Participants’ perception of therapeutic factors in group counseling: The role of interpersonal style and stage of group development. Small Group Behavior, 19, 452–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlighan, D. M., & Tarrant, J. M. (2001). Does group climate mediate the group leadership-group member outcome relationship? A test of Yalom’s hypotheses about leadership priorities. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 5, 220–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, B. C., Davies, D., & van der Vegt, R. (1987). Training group development and outcomes. Small Group Behavior, 18, 309–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. A. (1989). Group properties and outcome: A study of group norms in self help groups for widows and widowers. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. A., Yalom, I. D., & Miles, M. B. (1973). Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K. R. (1983). The clinical application of a group climate measure. In R. R. Dies & K. R. Mackenzie (Hrsg.), Advances in group psychotherapy: Integrating research and practice (S. 159–170). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K. R. (1990). Introduction to time-limited group psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K. R. (1994). The developing structure of the therapy group system. In H. Bernard & K. R. MacKenzie (Hrsg.), Basics of group psychotherapy (S. 35–59). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, K. R. (1997). Clinical application of group development ideas. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNair-Semands, R. R., & Lese, K. P. (2000). Interpersonal problems and the perception of therapeutic factors in group therapy. Small Group Research, 31, 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquet, A. (2008). Kohäsion in psychotherapeutischen Gruppen. Entwicklung und Anwendung einer Skala zur Messung von Gruppenkohäsion unter Berücksichtigung der Perspektiven Patient, Therapeut und Beobachter. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattke, D., & Schreiber-Willnow, K. (2002). Behandlung in geschlossenen versus offene Gruppen in der stationären Psychotherapie. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 38, 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattke, D., Dammann, G., & Martius, P. (2007). Der Transfer von einzeltherapeutischen Behandlungskonzepten auf Gruppenformate: Das Beispiel der Übertragungsfokussierten Psychotherapie (TFP). Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 43, 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattke, D., Reddemann, L., & Strauß, B. (2009). Keine Angst vor Gruppen . Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarty, C., Haslam, B. A., Hutchinson, J. K., & Grace, D. M. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H., & Humphrey, B. (1973). Group environment scale technical report. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L., (1987). The formation of small groups. In C. Hendrick (Hrsg.), Group processes (S. 80–110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morran, D. K., Stockton, R., & Teed, C. (1998). Facilitating feedback exchange in groups: Leader interventions. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 23, 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noppen, B. L. van, Pato, M. T., Marsland, R., & Rasmussen, S. A. (1998). A time limited behavioral group for treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice & Research, 7, 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parloff, M. B. (1968). Analytic group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passariello, N. M., & Newnes, C. (1988). The clinical application of a sociometric test in a therapeutic community: A case study. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 40, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B. (1998). Developing consensus about groupthink after all these years. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 362–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihanger, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindner, E. C. (2000). Group process-psychoeducation model for psychiatric clients and their families. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Issues, 38, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterfield, J. M. (1994). Integrating group dynamics and cognitive behavioral groups: A hybrid model. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1977). Classroom reward structure. An analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47, 633–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A., & Kibel, H. D. (1984). A group dynamic-peer interactions approach to group psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 34, 315–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & Burgmeier-Lohse, M. (1994a). Prozess-Ergebnis-Zusammenhänge in der analytisch orientierten Gruppenpsychotherapie: Eine Erkundungsstudie im stationären Rahmen. Psychotherapeut, 39, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & Burgmeier-Lohse, M. (1994b). Stationäre Langzeitgruppenpsychotherapie. Heidelberg: Asanger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, B., & Kirchmann, H. (2004). Eine naturalistische Studie zu Veränderungen und therapeutischen Faktoren in der Gruppenanalyse – Ergebnisse der GRAS-Studie. Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 40, 394–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, B., Burlingame, G. M., & Bormann, B. (2008). Using the CORE Battery-R in Group Psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1225–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1997). Stages of small group development revisitied. Group & Organization Management, 2 , 419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, S., Yalom, I. D. (1990). Self-disclosure in group psychotherapy. In G. Stricker & M. Fisher (Hrsg.), Self-disclosure in the therapeutic relationship (S. 191–204). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. L., & Kivlighan, D. M. (1995). Things unsaid in group counseling: An empirical taxonomy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 586–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, D. A., & Simon, A. F. (1998). Categorical and dynamic groups: Implications for social perception and intergroup behavior. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler & C. A. Insko (Hrsg.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (S. 27–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilfley, D. E., Frank, M. A., Welch, R., Superrell, E. B., & Rounsaville, B. J. (1998). Adapting interpersonal psychotherapy to a group format (IPT-G) for binge eating disorder: Toward a model for adapting empirically supported treatments. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. D. (1970). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. Oxford: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4. Aufl.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I.D., & Leszcz, M. (2007). Theorie und Praxis der Gruppenpsychotherapie: Ein Lehrbuch (9. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Judd, C. M. (2004). Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism: Introduction and overview. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, O. Corneille (Hrsg.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (S. 1–22). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychosoziale Medizin u. Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Stoystr. 3, 07740, Jena, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Dipl.-Psych. Bernhard Strauß

  2. Fachärztliche Praxis für Psychosomatische Medizin, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, Psychoanalyse, Josephinenstr. 17, 81479, München, Deutschland

    Dr. med. Dankwart Mattke

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Dipl.-Psych. Bernhard Strauß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. med. Dankwart Mattke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychosoziale Medizin u. Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Stoystr. 3, 07740, Jena, Deutschland

    Bernhard Strauß

  2. Fachärztliche Praxis für Psychosomatische Medizin, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, Psychoanalyse, Josephinenstr. 17, 81479, München, Deutschland

    Dankwart Mattke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strauß, B., Mattke, D. (2012). Gruppentherapieprozesse: Eine klinische Forschungsperspektive. In: Strauß, B., Mattke, D. (eds) Gruppenpsychotherapie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03497-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation