Abstract
The approach to the bladder neck (BN) is the first critical step of antegrade laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Its identification can be difficult in some cases and a mistake at this point of the surgery can compromise the rest of the operation, influencing the next steps of dissection as well as the anastomosis. Because of the complexity of the continence mechanism, the value of preserving the BN during radical prostatectomy is still debated, even if there is some evidence for an earlier return to continence in the cases where it is preserved. Preservation of the BN does not seem to be correlated with a higher risk of positive margins, even if some authors suggest that a wide resection of the bladder neck decreases the positive surgical margin rate. In our opinion, an accurate dissection of the BN and its preservation, especially of the posterior wall, could improve the early return to continence. The use of the robotic assistance allows us to perform a fine dissection and preservation of the bladder neck when this is indicated. In this chapter we describe our technique and some tricks to perform a safe dissection of the bladder neck, exploring the anatomy and a step-by-step surgical procedure for several different situations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP (1998) Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 51:67–72
Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA, Lee DI, Skarecky DW (2004) Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology 64:1224–1228
Deliveliotis C, Protogerou V, Alargof E, Varkarakis J (2002) Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing: effects on continence and positive margins. Urology 60:855–858
Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Taille A de la, Antiphon P, Abbou CC (2003) Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodelling and nerve preservation. J Urol 169:2049–2052
Walsh PC, Retik AB, Darracott Vaughan E, Wein AJ (2003) Campbell’s urology, 8th edn, Chap. 2. Elesevier, St. Louis
Secin FP, Karanikolas N, Gopalan A, Bianco FJ, Shayegan B, Touijer K, Olgac S, Myers RP, Dalbagni G, Guillonneau B (2007) The anterior layer of Denonvilliers’ fascia: a common misconception in the laparoscopic prostatectomy literature. J Urol 177:521−525
Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN (2007) Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol 51:629–639
Wimpissinger TF, Tschabitscher M, Feichtinger H, Stackl W (2003) Surgical anatomy of the puboprostatic complex with special reference to radical perineal prostatectomy. BJU Int 92:681–684
Young HH (1945) The cure of cancer of the prostate by radical perineal prostatectomy (prostato-seminal vesiculectomy): history, literature and statistics of Young’s operation. J Urol 53:188–256
Steiner MS (1994) The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: an anatomic study. Urology 44:530–534
Albers DD, Faulkner KK, Cheatham WN, Elledge EF, Coalson RE (1973) Surgical anatomy of the pubovesical (puboprostatic) ligaments. J Urol 109:388–392
Myers RP (2002) Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy – anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology 59:472–479
Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Teber D, Seemann O, Frede T (2004) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 14:75–82
Young HH (1937) The radical cure of cancer of the prostate. Surg Gynecol Obstet 64:472–484
Presti JC Jr, Schmidt RA, Narayan PA, Carroll PR, Tanagho EA (1990) Pathophysiology of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 143:975–978
Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, Gettman MT, Katz R, Salomon L et al. (2003) Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 61:617–622
Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166:2101–2108
Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R, Do M, Sakelaropoulos G, Horn LC, Truss MC (2006) Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49:103–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Piechaud, T., Annino, F. (2008). Bladder Neck Dissection During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74139-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74140-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)