Skip to main content

Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy

  • Chapter
Robotic Urology

Abstract

The introduction of robot-assisted surgery for pelvic laparoscopy, especially in performing radical prostatectomy, is starting to broaden the possibilities in performing complicated operations in the pelvis. Three-dimensional vision with tenfold magnification, and the dexterity provided by the EndoWrist (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, Calif.; six degrees of freedom) allows the surgeon to operate the tips of the laparoscopic instruments like an open surgeon. The surgeon will benefit from a faster learning curve as compared with conventional laparoscopy. These advantages have allowed surgeons to translate standard open surgical procedure to a minimally invasive field, especially with its potential in operating in a narrow pelvis as well as reconstructing a urinary neobladder which requires extensive suturing. Multiple centers in North America and Europe have already started to use the robot for surgery in advanced bladder cancer. Various technical procedures have been described concerning both the radical cystectomy and the type of urinary diversion. The potential advantages of robotic surgery is similar to those of conventional laparoscopic surgery, i.e., decreased pain, decreased hospital stay, shorter recovery time, decreased blood loss, and smaller incisions. These differences are easily noted by the patients and may lead to increased demand for robot-assisted treatment. The robot-assisted cystectomy has limitations such as longer operating time, more difficult lymph node dissection, and higher cost for the procedure. To date, only limited data on the oncological outcome in minimally invasive cystectomy series have been presented. The only 5-year data available suggest comparable oncological outcome for laparoscopic and open surgery. It is unclear if robot-assisted cystectomy will have a place in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer; however, the next generation of robots will probably be less expensive than current systems. New instruments that will simplify as well as allow more exact dissection will be developed, and the possibility to combine radiology and other imaging techniques with live online vision systems is also likely to be developed in the near future. Patient selection, preoperative preparation, and surgical technique for cystectomy and lymph node dissection are discussed as well as the technique used for intracorporeal construction of the urinary diversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ (2006) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 56:106−130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Advanced Bladder Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 36:1927−1934

    Google Scholar 

  3. Larsson P, Wijkström H, Thorstenson A, Adolfsson J, Norming U, Wiklund P, Onelöv E, Steineck G (2003) A population-based study of 538 patients with newly detected urinary bladder neoplasms followed during 5 years. Scand J Urol Nephrol 37:195−201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, Boullier JA (1992) Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol 148:1140−1144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiklund NP (2004) Technology insight: surgical robots − expensive toys or the future of urologic surgery? Nat Clin Pract Urol 1:97−102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moinzadeh A, Gill IS, Desai M, Finelli A, Falcone T, Kaouk J (2005) Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the female. J Urol 173:1912−1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Velthoven RF, Rassweiler J (2005) de la Rosette JMCH, Gill IS (eds) Laparoscopic urologic surgery in malignancies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 97−113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Guru KA, Kim HL, Piacente PM, Mohler JL (2007) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology 69:469−474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Shoma AM, El-Tabey NA, Shaaban A, Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA (2003) Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 92:232−236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Savage SJ (2004) Radical cystectomy: the minimally invasive approach. Urol Oncol 2:262−263

    Google Scholar 

  11. Curto F, Benijts J, Pansadoro A, Barmoshe S, Hoepffner JL, Mugnier C, Piechaud T, Gaston R (2006) Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique. Eur Urol 49:44−52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA, Lee DI, Skarecky DW (2004) Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology 64:1224−1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jhaveri FM, Whitesides EW, Sackett CK et al. (1998) Preservation of sexual function in women after anterior exentration for bladder cancer. Br J Urol 81:312−331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV (2003) Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology 61:699−702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paz A, Cytron s:, Stepnov E, Shumalinski D (2003) A prospective study between laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy. J Endourol 17:A80

    Google Scholar 

  16. Matin SG, Gill IS (2002) Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with urinary diversion: completely intracorporeal technique. J Endourol 1:335−341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haber GP, Gill IS (2007) Laparoscopic radical cystectomy for cancer: oncological outcomes at up to 5 years. BJU Int 10:137−142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guru, K., Jonsson, M., Wiklund, P. (2008). Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74139-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74140-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics