Skip to main content

Erectile Function After Robotic Prostatectomy: Anatomical Aspects and Treatment

  • Chapter
Robotic Urology

Abstract

Prostate cancer has a significant impact on men’s quality of life in the United States. More than 230,000 new cases diagnosed each year and more than 30,000 annual deaths attributed to this malignancy [1]. The maintenance of satisfactory quality of life is the principle concern for more than 45% of men who elect treatment for localized prostate cancer [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jemal A et al. (2005) Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55(1):10−30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crawford ED et al. (1997) Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data. Urology 50(3):366−372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shrader-Bogen CL et al. (1997) Quality of life and treatment outcomes: prostate carcinoma patients’ perspectives after prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Cancer 79(10):1977−1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh C et al. (2000) Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55(1):58−61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulcahy JJ (2000) Erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 18(1):71−75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nandipati KC et al. (2006) Erectile dysfunction following radical retropubic prostatectomy: epi­demiology, pathophysiology and pharmacological management. Drugs Aging 23(2):101−117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalona WJ et al. (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162(2):433−438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bianco FJ Jr et al. (2005) Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J Urol 173(6):2099−2103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quinlan DM et al. (1991) Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J Urol 145(5):998−1002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Catalona WJ, Basler JW (1993) Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 150(3):905−907

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rabbani F et al. (2000) Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164(6):1929−1934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Geary ES et al. (1995) Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 45(6):1000−1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu JC et al. (2004) Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE. J Urol 171(2 Pt 1):703−708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanford JL et al. (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Am Med Assoc 283(3):354−360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sculpher M et al. (2004) Patients’ preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment. Br Med J 328(7436):382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Steineck G et al. (2002) Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 347(11):790−796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh C, Donker J (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128(3):492−497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burnett AL (2005) Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. J Am Med Assoc 293(21):2648−2653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Penson DF et al. (2005) 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol 173(5):1701−1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bianco FJ Scardino TP, Eastham JA (2005) Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 66(5 Suppl):83−94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stephenson RA et al. (2005) Treatment of erectile dysfunction following therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: patient reported use and outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Urol 174(2):646−650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozet F et al. (2005) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J Urol 174(3):908−911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaul S et al. (2006) Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int 97(3):467−472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahlering TE, Skarecky DD, Borin JJ (2006) Impact of cautery versus cautery-free preservation of neurovascular bundles on early return of potency. J Endourol 20(8):586−589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreland RB (1998) Is there a role of hypoxemia in penile fibrosis: a viewpoint presented to the Society for the Study of Impotence. Int J Impot Res 10(2):113−120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. User HM et al. (2003) Penile weight and cell subtype specific changes in a post-radical prostatectomy model of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 169(3):1175−1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Breza J et al. (1989) Detailed anatomy of penile neurovascular structures: surgical significance. J Urol 141(2):437−443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Polascik TJ, Walsh C (1995) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of accessory pudendal arteries on the recovery of sexual function. J Urol 154(1):150−152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rogers CG, Trock BP, Walsh C (2004) Preservation of accessory pudendal arteries during radical retropubic prostatectomy: surgical technique and results. Urology 64(1):148−151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lepor H et al. (1985) Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. J Urol 133(2):207−212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Takenaka A et al. (2004) Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172(3):1032−1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tewari A et al. (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(2):314−323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Takenaka A et al. (2005) Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 65(1):136−142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kato R et al. (2003) Cavernous nerve injury elicits GAP-43 mRNA expression but not regeneration of injured pelvic ganglion neurons. Brain Res 986(1−2):166−173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Takenaka A et al. (2005) Interindividual variation in distribution of extramural ganglion cells in the male pelvis: a semi-quantitative and immunohistochemical study concerning nerve-sparing pelvic surgery. Eur Urol 48(1):46−52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Butler-Manuel SA et al. (2002) Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical and simple hysterectomy: a quantitative study of nerve types in the uterine supporting ligaments. J Soc Gynecol Investig 9(1):47−56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tewari AK, Rao SR (2006) Anatomical foundations and surgical manoeuvres for precise identification of the prostatovesical junction during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(4):833−837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tewari A et al. (2006) Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(4):829−832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaul S et al. (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 66(6):1261−1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaul S et al. (2007) Da vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51(1):186−192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tewari A et al. (2003) An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 43(5):444−454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ahlering TE et al. (2005) Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neuro­vascular bundle preservation. Urology 65(5):994−997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahlering TE, Eichel LL, Skarecky DD (2005) Rapid communication: early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 19(6):715−718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chien GW et al. (2005) Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology 66(2):419−423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zorn KC et al. (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 51(3):755−763 Epub 27 October 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Joseph JV et al. (2006) Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):945−951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zippe CD et al. (2001) Management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2(6):495−503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N III (2002) The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res14(4):226−244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rosen RC et al. (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the Inter­national Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11(6):319−326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Mazur DJ, Merz JF (1995) Older patients’ willingness to trade off urologic adverse outcomes for a better chance at five-year survival in the clinical setting of prostate cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 43(9):979−984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bannowsky A et al. (2006) Nocturnal tumescence: a parameter for postoperative erectile integrity after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 175(6):2214−2217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mulhall JP et al. (2002) Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: hemodynamic profiles and their correlation with the recovery of erectile function. J Urol 167(3):1371−1375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mulhall JP, Graydon RJ (1996) The hemodynamics of erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 8(2):91−94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sattar AA et al. (1996) Correlation of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring duplex ultrasonography and infusion cavernosometry for the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 155(4):1274−1276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Montorsi F et al. (1997) Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 158(4):1408−1410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zippe CD et al. (2000) Role of Viagra after radical prostatectomy. Urology 55(2):241−245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Raina R et al. (2003) Long-term effect of sildenafil citrate on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: 3-year follow-up. Urology 62(1):110−115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brock G et al. (2003) Safety and efficacy of vardenafil for the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1278−1283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Nehra A et al. (2005) Vardenafil improved patient satisfaction with erectile hardness, orgasmic function and sexual experience in men with erectile dysfunction following nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173(6):2067−2071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Carson CC et al. (2004) The efficacy and safety of tadalafil: an update. BJU Int 93(9):1276−1281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Raina R et al. (2003) Long-term efficacy and compliance of intracorporeal (IC) injection for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: SHIM (IIEF-5) analysis. Int J Impot Res 15(5):318−322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Mulhall JP et al. (1999) The causes of patient dropout from penile self-injection therapy for impotence. J Urol 162(4):1291−1294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Porst H (1997) Transurethral alprostadil with MUSE (medicated urethral system for erection) vs intracavernous alprostadil: a comparative study in 103 patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 9(4):187−192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Cookson MS, Nadig PW (1993) Long-term results with vacuum constriction device. J Urol 149(2):290−294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen J, Mabjeesh NNJ, Greenstein A (2001) Sildenafil versus the vacuum erection device: patient preference. J Urol 166(5):1779−1781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Chen J et al. (2004) Concomitant use of sildenafil and a vacuum entrapment device for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 171(1):292−295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martinez-Salamanca, J., Tewari, A. (2008). Erectile Function After Robotic Prostatectomy: Anatomical Aspects and Treatment. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74139-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74140-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics