Abstract
Prostate cancer has a significant impact on men’s quality of life in the United States. More than 230,000 new cases diagnosed each year and more than 30,000 annual deaths attributed to this malignancy [1]. The maintenance of satisfactory quality of life is the principle concern for more than 45% of men who elect treatment for localized prostate cancer [2].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jemal A et al. (2005) Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55(1):10−30
Crawford ED et al. (1997) Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analyses of survey data. Urology 50(3):366−372
Shrader-Bogen CL et al. (1997) Quality of life and treatment outcomes: prostate carcinoma patients’ perspectives after prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Cancer 79(10):1977−1986
Walsh C et al. (2000) Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 55(1):58−61
Mulcahy JJ (2000) Erectile function after radical prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol 18(1):71−75
Nandipati KC et al. (2006) Erectile dysfunction following radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacological management. Drugs Aging 23(2):101−117
Catalona WJ et al. (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162(2):433−438
Bianco FJ Jr et al. (2005) Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J Urol 173(6):2099−2103
Quinlan DM et al. (1991) Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J Urol 145(5):998−1002
Catalona WJ, Basler JW (1993) Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 150(3):905−907
Rabbani F et al. (2000) Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164(6):1929−1934
Geary ES et al. (1995) Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 45(6):1000−1006
Hu JC et al. (2004) Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE. J Urol 171(2 Pt 1):703−708
Stanford JL et al. (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Am Med Assoc 283(3):354−360
Sculpher M et al. (2004) Patients’ preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experiment. Br Med J 328(7436):382
Steineck G et al. (2002) Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 347(11):790−796
Walsh C, Donker J (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128(3):492−497
Burnett AL (2005) Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. J Am Med Assoc 293(21):2648−2653
Penson DF et al. (2005) 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol 173(5):1701−1705
Bianco FJ Scardino TP, Eastham JA (2005) Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 66(5 Suppl):83−94
Stephenson RA et al. (2005) Treatment of erectile dysfunction following therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: patient reported use and outcomes from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Urol 174(2):646−650
Rozet F et al. (2005) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J Urol 174(3):908−911
Kaul S et al. (2006) Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int 97(3):467−472
Ahlering TE, Skarecky DD, Borin JJ (2006) Impact of cautery versus cautery-free preservation of neurovascular bundles on early return of potency. J Endourol 20(8):586−589
Moreland RB (1998) Is there a role of hypoxemia in penile fibrosis: a viewpoint presented to the Society for the Study of Impotence. Int J Impot Res 10(2):113−120
User HM et al. (2003) Penile weight and cell subtype specific changes in a post-radical prostatectomy model of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 169(3):1175−1179
Breza J et al. (1989) Detailed anatomy of penile neurovascular structures: surgical significance. J Urol 141(2):437−443
Polascik TJ, Walsh C (1995) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of accessory pudendal arteries on the recovery of sexual function. J Urol 154(1):150−152
Rogers CG, Trock BP, Walsh C (2004) Preservation of accessory pudendal arteries during radical retropubic prostatectomy: surgical technique and results. Urology 64(1):148−151
Lepor H et al. (1985) Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. J Urol 133(2):207−212
Takenaka A et al. (2004) Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172(3):1032−1035
Tewari A et al. (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(2):314−323
Takenaka A et al. (2005) Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 65(1):136−142
Kato R et al. (2003) Cavernous nerve injury elicits GAP-43 mRNA expression but not regeneration of injured pelvic ganglion neurons. Brain Res 986(1−2):166−173
Takenaka A et al. (2005) Interindividual variation in distribution of extramural ganglion cells in the male pelvis: a semi-quantitative and immunohistochemical study concerning nerve-sparing pelvic surgery. Eur Urol 48(1):46−52
Butler-Manuel SA et al. (2002) Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical and simple hysterectomy: a quantitative study of nerve types in the uterine supporting ligaments. J Soc Gynecol Investig 9(1):47−56
Tewari AK, Rao SR (2006) Anatomical foundations and surgical manoeuvres for precise identification of the prostatovesical junction during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(4):833−837
Tewari A et al. (2006) Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(4):829−832
Kaul S et al. (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 66(6):1261−1265
Kaul S et al. (2007) Da vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51(1):186−192
Tewari A et al. (2003) An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 43(5):444−454
Ahlering TE et al. (2005) Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology 65(5):994−997
Ahlering TE, Eichel LL, Skarecky DD (2005) Rapid communication: early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 19(6):715−718
Chien GW et al. (2005) Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology 66(2):419−423
Zorn KC et al. (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 51(3):755−763 Epub 27 October 2006
Joseph JV et al. (2006) Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):945−951
Zippe CD et al. (2001) Management of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 2(6):495−503
Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano N III (2002) The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res14(4):226−244
Rosen RC et al. (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11(6):319−326
Mazur DJ, Merz JF (1995) Older patients’ willingness to trade off urologic adverse outcomes for a better chance at five-year survival in the clinical setting of prostate cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 43(9):979−984
Bannowsky A et al. (2006) Nocturnal tumescence: a parameter for postoperative erectile integrity after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 175(6):2214−2217
Mulhall JP et al. (2002) Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: hemodynamic profiles and their correlation with the recovery of erectile function. J Urol 167(3):1371−1375
Mulhall JP, Graydon RJ (1996) The hemodynamics of erectile dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 8(2):91−94
Sattar AA et al. (1996) Correlation of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring duplex ultrasonography and infusion cavernosometry for the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 155(4):1274−1276
Montorsi F et al. (1997) Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 158(4):1408−1410
Zippe CD et al. (2000) Role of Viagra after radical prostatectomy. Urology 55(2):241−245
Raina R et al. (2003) Long-term effect of sildenafil citrate on erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: 3-year follow-up. Urology 62(1):110−115
Brock G et al. (2003) Safety and efficacy of vardenafil for the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1278−1283
Nehra A et al. (2005) Vardenafil improved patient satisfaction with erectile hardness, orgasmic function and sexual experience in men with erectile dysfunction following nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173(6):2067−2071
Carson CC et al. (2004) The efficacy and safety of tadalafil: an update. BJU Int 93(9):1276−1281
Raina R et al. (2003) Long-term efficacy and compliance of intracorporeal (IC) injection for erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: SHIM (IIEF-5) analysis. Int J Impot Res 15(5):318−322
Mulhall JP et al. (1999) The causes of patient dropout from penile self-injection therapy for impotence. J Urol 162(4):1291−1294
Porst H (1997) Transurethral alprostadil with MUSE (medicated urethral system for erection) vs intracavernous alprostadil: a comparative study in 103 patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 9(4):187−192
Cookson MS, Nadig PW (1993) Long-term results with vacuum constriction device. J Urol 149(2):290−294
Chen J, Mabjeesh NNJ, Greenstein A (2001) Sildenafil versus the vacuum erection device: patient preference. J Urol 166(5):1779−1781
Chen J et al. (2004) Concomitant use of sildenafil and a vacuum entrapment device for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 171(1):292−295
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinez-Salamanca, J., Tewari, A. (2008). Erectile Function After Robotic Prostatectomy: Anatomical Aspects and Treatment. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74139-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74140-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)