Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multitrait-Multimethod-Analysen

  • Chapter
Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Auszug

Unter der Bezeichnung „Multitrait-Multimethod-Analyse“ (MTMM-Analyse) wird eine Gruppe von Verfahren zum Nachweis der Konstruktvalidität eines Tests oder Fragebogens verstanden. Charakteristischer Weise wird für diesen Nachweis eine systematische Kombination von mehreren Traits (Merkmalen) mit mehreren Messmethoden vorgenommen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Biesanz, J. C. & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72, 845–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M. & Diener, E. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D., & Marsh, H.W. (1994). Identification with deficient rank loading matrices in confirmatory factor analysis: Multitrait-multimethod models. Psychometrika, 59, 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, J., Frey, A. & Jude, N. (2007). Validität. In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s ReferenceGuide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelava, A. & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2007). Latent-State-Trait-The-orie. In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (Kapitel 15). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitraitmultimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitraitmultimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 335–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. & Bailey, M. (1991). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 177–187).Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1987). Validation of thefive-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–196). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H. & Kelava, A. (2007). Qualitätsanforderungen an einen psychologischen Test (Testgütekriterien). In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H. & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2007). Exploratorische (EFA) und Konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse (CFA). In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. (2004). Mplus User’s Guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbeck, F. W., Eid, M., Geiser, C., Courvoisier, D. S. & Cole, D. A. (2007). Konvergente und diskriminante Validität über die Zeit: Integration von Multitrait-Multimethod-Modellen und der Latent State-Trait-Theorie. In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Psychological Methods, 88, 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74. Available: http://www.mpr-online.de

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, K. (2003). The role of expectations in investigating multitrait-multimethod matrices by Procrustes rotation. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 1–19. Available: http://www.mpr-online.de

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1961). Analysis of unreplicated three-way classifications with applications to rater bias and trait independence. Psychometrika, 26, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Lehrstuhl für Psychologische Methodenlehre, Evaluation und Forschungsmethodik, J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main Institut für Psychologie, Mertonstraße 17, 60054, Frankfurt am Main

    Karin Schermelleh-Engel PD Dr.

  2. apl. Professor für Psychologie, J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main Institut für Psychologie, Senckenberganlage 31, 60325, Frankfurtam Main

    Karl Schweizer Prof. Dr.

Authors
  1. Karin Schermelleh-Engel PD Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karl Schweizer Prof. Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Abteilung Psychologische Methodenlehre, Evaluation und Forschungsmethodik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Mertonstraße 17, 60054, Frankfurt a.M.

    Helfried Moosbrugger  & Augustin Kelava  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Schweizer, K. (2008). Multitrait-Multimethod-Analysen. In: Moosbrugger, H., Kelava, A. (eds) Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71635-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation