Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adaptives Testen

  • Chapter
Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Auszug

Bei den meisten Fragebogen- und Testverfahren wird allen Probanden eine festgelegte Menge von Items in einer festen Reihenfolge vorgegeben. Beim adaptiven Testen werden abweichend davon aufgrund des Antwortverhaltens des untersuchten Probanden nur solche Items zur Bearbeitung vorgelegt, die möglichst viel diagnostische Information über die individuelle Ausprägung des zu messenden Merkmals liefern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bergstrom, B. A., Lunz, M. E. & Gershon, R. C. (1992). Altering the level of difficulty in computer adaptive testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E. (1975). New types of information and psychological implications. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Computerized adaptive trait measurement: Problems and Prospects (Research Report 75-5, pp. 32–43). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E. & Weiss, D. J. (1976a). Effects of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive testing on ability test performance (Research Rep. 76-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, N. E. & Weiss, D. J. (1976b). Psychological effect of immediate knowledge of results and adaptive ability testing (Research Rep. 76-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D. & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, C. H. (2000). Ein Mehrdimensionales Testmodell mit Anwendungen in der pädagogisch-psychologischen Diagnostik. IPN-Schriftenreihe 171. Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. E. & Liou, M. (2000). Estimation of trait level in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2004). Contributions to the theory and practice of computerized adaptive testing. Enschede: Print Partners Ipskamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, A. (2006). Validitätssteigerungen durch adaptives Testen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, A. & Ehmke, T. (Im Druck). Hypothetischer Einsatz adaptiven Testens bei der Messung von Bildungsstandards in Mathematik. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, A., Hartig, J. & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Effekte des adaptiven Testens auf die Motivation zur Testbearbeitung. Manuskript eingereicht zur Publikation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, A. & Moosbrugger, H. (2004). Kann die Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung und Aktivierung durch adaptives Testen mit dem Frankfurter Adaptiven Konzentrationsleistungs-Test FAKT vermieden werden? Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., Zaal, J. N. & Pieters, J. P. M. (1991). Computerized adaptive testing:Theory, applications, and standards. In R. K. Hambleton & J. N. Zaal (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing: Theory and applications (pp. 341–366). New York, NY, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, J., Frey, A. & Jude, N. (2007). Validität. In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2000). Computer-Adaptive Testing: A methodolgy whose time has come. In C. Sunhee, K. Unson, J. Eunhwa and J. M. Linacre (Eds.), Development of Computerized Middle School Achievement Test. Seoul, South Korea: Komesa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1971a). The self-scoring flexilevel test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 8, 147–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1971b). A theoretical study of two-stage testing. Psychometrika, 36, 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loßnitzer, T. (2003). Vermeidung der Konfundierung von Konzentrationsleistung mit negativer Affektivität durch Adaptives Testen mit dem Frankfurter Adaptiven Konzentrationsleistungs-Test (FAKT). Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loßnitzer, T., Frey, A. & Moosbrugger, H. (2006). Controlling unwanted effects of noise on performance by adaptive testing. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecht, R. M. (1996). Multidimensional computerized adaptive testing in a certification or licensure context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Item Response Theorie. In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Hrsg.). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H. & Heyden, M. (1997). Frankfurter Adaptiver Konzentrationsleistungs-Test. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H. & Goldhammer, F. (2007). FAKT-II. Frankfurter Adaptiver Konzentrationsleistungs-Test. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R.J. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantal response in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsoda, V., Olea, J., Rodriguez, M. S. & Revuelta, J. (1999). The effects of test difficulty manipulation in computerized adaptive testing and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocklin, T. R. & O’ Donnell, A. M. (1987). Self-adapted testing: A performance-improving variant of computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 315–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (2004). Lehrbuch Testtheorie, Testkonstruktion (2. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K. & McBride, J. R. (Eds.) (1997). Computerized adaptive testing:From inquiry to operation. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, D. O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, D. O. (2000). Principles of multidimensional adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. Glas (Eds.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, D. O. (2005). Computerized Adaptive Testing. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sympson, J. B.& Hetter, R. D. (1985). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. In Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973–977). San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thissen, D.& Mislevy, R.J. (2000). Testing Algorithms. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (pp. 101–133). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (1999a). A procedure for empirical initialization of the trait estimator on ability estimates. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. (1999b). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 398–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J. & Glas, C. A. (Eds.) (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W. J.& Veldkamp, B. P. (2004). Constraining item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with shadow tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. (2000) (Ed.). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd Ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. & Thissen, D. (1987). Estimating ability with the wrong model. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. & Chen, P. (2004). Implementation and measurement efficiency of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 450–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D. J. (1983). New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter, Olshausenstraße 62, 24098, Kiel

    Andreas Frey Dr.

Authors
  1. Andreas Frey Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Abteilung Psychologische Methodenlehre, Evaluation und Forschungsmethodik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Mertonstraße 17, 60054, Frankfurt a.M.

    Helfried Moosbrugger  & Augustin Kelava  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frey, A. (2008). Adaptives Testen. In: Moosbrugger, H., Kelava, A. (eds) Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71635-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation