Skip to main content

Ultraschall in der Geburtshilfe

  • Chapter
Die Geburtshilfe
  • 1646 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP (1995) Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172: 1379–1387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1991) Ultrasound imaging in pregnancy. ACOG committee opinion 96, Washington DC: ACOG

    Google Scholar 

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1993) Ultrasonography in pregnancy. ACOG technical bulletin 187, Washington, DC: ACOG

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (1988) Bioeffects considerations for the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 7[Suppl9]: 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (1991) Guidelines for the performance of the antepartum obstetrical ultrasound examination. AIUM, Rockville/MD

    Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (1993) Bioeffects and safety of diagnostic ultrasound. AIUM, Rockville/MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett SB, Malik D (2001) International Perinatal Doppler Society, Guidelines and recommendations for safe use of Doppler ultrasound in perinatal applications. J Maternal Med 10(2): 75–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benacerraf BR, Adzick NS (1987) Fetal diaphragmatic hernia: ultrasound diagnosis and clinical outcome in 19 cases. Obstet Gynecol 156: 673–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker L, Neilson JP (2001) Routine Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4. Oxford: Update Software

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley B, Estroff JA, Sanders SP et al. (1992) Fetal echocardiography: accuracy and limitations in a population at high and low risk for heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166: 1473–1481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty LS, Chudleigh P, Wright E, Campbell S, Pembrey M (1998) The significance of choroid plexus cysts in an unselected population: results of a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12(6): 391–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Copel JA, Pilu G, Green J, Hobbins JC, Kleinmann CS (1987) Fetal echocar-diographic screening for congenital heart disease: the importance of the four-chamber view. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157: 648–655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, NJ (2004) A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25(1): 80–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD et al. (1993) Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. N Engl J Med 329: 821–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fatum M, Rojansky N (2001) Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56: 50–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fossum GT, Davajan V, Kletzy OA (1988) Early detection of pregnancy with transvaginal ultrasound. Fertil Steril 49: 788–791

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglioti P, Danelon D, Bontempo S, Mombro M, Cardaropoli S, Todros T (2005) Fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: outcome in 176 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25(4): 372–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gembruch U, Chaoui R (1997) Pränatale Diagnostik fetaler Herzfehler durch Untersuchung von «high-risk» und «low-risk» Kollektiven — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen eines Screening-Programms. Gynäkologe 30: 191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles W, Bisits A (1993) Clinical use of Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy: information from six randomised trials. Fetal Diagn Ther 8: 247–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grannum PAT, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC (1979) The ultrasonographic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133: 815–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK (1984) Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 152: 497–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann M (1976) Ultraschallbiometrie im II. und III. Trimester der Schwangerschaft. Gynäkologe 9: 133–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C et al. (2004) Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(1): 50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH (1998) Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12(5): 312–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone FD, Prescott RJ, Steel JM, Mao JH, Chambers S, Muir N (1996) Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomie in diabetic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 747–754

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler MF (1994) The adnexal mass in pregnancy. Postgrad Obstet Gynecol 14(12): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees C, Parra M, Missfelder-Lobor H, Morgans A, Fletcher O, Nicolaides KH (2001) Individualized risk assessment for adverse pregnanc outcome by uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks. Obstet Gynecol 98(3): 369–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leivo T, Tuomine R, Saari-Kemppainen A, Ylöstalo P, Karjalainen O, Heinonen P (1996) Cost-effectiveness off one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7: 309–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons EA, Dyke C, Toms M, Cheang M (1988) In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: a 6-year follow-up. Radiology 166: 687–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magann EF, Sanderson M, Martin JN, Chauhan S (1999) The amniotic fluid index, single deepest pocket, and two-diameter pocket in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182: 1581–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren RA, Pucket JL, Chauhan S (1995) Estimations of birthweight in pregnant women requiring induction:a comparison of seven sonographic models. Obstet Gynecol 85: 565–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merz E (1988) Biometrie des Fetus im 2. und 3.Trimenon. In: Merz E (Hrsg) Sonographische Diagnostik in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Thieme, Stuttgart 134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz E, Wellek S (1996) Das normale fetale Wachstumsprofil — ein einheitliches Modell zur Berechnung von Normalkurven für die gängigen Kopf-und Abdomenparameter sowie die großen Extremitätenknochen. Ultraschall Med 14/4: 153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz et al. (2002) Leitlinie Qualitätsanforderungen an die weiterführende differenzialdiagnostische Ultraschalluntersuchung in der pränatalen Diagnostik (= DEGUM-Stufe II) im Zeitraum von 18 bis 22 Schwanger-schaftswochen. Ultraschall Med 23: 11–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow CP (1984) Postmolar trophoblastic disease: diagnostic, management and prognosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27: 211–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutterschaftsrichtlinien (1997) Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses für Ärzte und Krankenkassen über die ärztliche Betreuung während der Schwangerschaft und nach der Entbindung. Bundesanzeiger 45,6.3.1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson JP (2001) Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, 4, Oxford, update software

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MJ, Cavalieri R, Graham D, Sanders RC (1986) Cysts in pregnancy discovered by sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 14: 509–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newnham JP, Doherty DA, Kendall GE, Zubrick SR et al. (2004) Effects of repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations on childhood outcome up to 8 years of age:follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364: 2038–2044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg DA, Souter VL (2001) Sonographic markers of fetal trisomies: second trimester. J Ultrasound Med 20(6): 655–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ott WJ (1985) Accurate gestational dating. Obstet Gynecol 66: 311–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pilu G, Falco P, Gabrielli S, Perolo A, Sandri F, Bovicelli L (1999) The clinical significance of fetal isolated cerebral borderline ventriculomegaly: report of 31 cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14(5): 320–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratzel R (1996) Auswirkungen der Effizienzbewertung der Untersuchungen in der Schwangerschaft auf die Aufklärung. Gynäkologe 29: 590–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauskolb et al. (2004) Ultraschalldiagnostik im Rahmen der Schwangeren-vorsorge. Frauenarzt 45: 576 ff./AWMF-online Leitlinien-Register der DGGG

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempen A (1998) Ultraschall in der Frühschwangerschaft. In: Schmidt W (Hrsg) Jahrbuch der Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe 1997/98. Biermann, Zülpich, S 51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Richtlinien des Bundesausschusses für Ärzte und Krankenkassen überdie ärztliche Betreuung während der Schwangerschaft und nach der Entbindung. Bundesanzeiger 45, 6.3.1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn C (1995) Vorgehensweise zum Ausschluß oder Nachweis von Fehlbildungen. In: Sohn C, Holzgreve W (Hrsg) Ultraschall in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Thieme, S 367–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Standardkommission der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dopplersonographie und maternofetale Medizin (AGDMFM) (1996) Standards in der Perinatalmedizin — Dopplersonographie in der Schwangerschaft. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 56: M69–M73

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark CR, Orleans, M, Haverkamp AD, Murphy J (1984) Short-and long-term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstet Gynecol 6: 194–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Struyk AP, Treffers PE (1984) Ovarian tumors in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 63: 421–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toi A, Lister WS, Fong KW (2004) How early are fetal cerebral sulci visible at prenatal ultrasound and what is the normal pattern of early fetal sulcal development? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(7): 706–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ultraschallrichtlinien (1995) Dtsch Ärztebl 92: 311–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Usui R, Minakami H, Kosuge S, Iwasaki R, Ohwada M, Sato I (2000) A retrospective survey of clinical, pathologic, and prognostic features of adnexal masses operated on during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 26(2): 89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman A, Drugan A (2001) Sonographic findings of the umbilical cords implications for the risk of fetal chromosomal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17(6): 536–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen PM, Ng PS, Leung PL, Rogers MS (2004) Outcome in laparoscopic management of persistent adnexal mass during the second trimester of pregnancy. Surg Endosc 18(9): 1354–1357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schelling, M., Ostermayer, E. (2006). Ultraschall in der Geburtshilfe. In: Schneider, H., Husslein, P., Schneider, KT.M. (eds) Die Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33897-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33897-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33896-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33897-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics