Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Statistische Erfordernisse und Inferenzschlüsse in makroquantitativ vergleichenden Forschungsdesigns

  • Chapter
Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft

Auszug

Makroquantitative Forschungsdesigns haben in den letzten zwei bis drei Dezennien enorm an Popularität gewonnen. Die Zahl der Publikationen, deren empirische Grundlage statistische Daten aus den Archiven der OECD, EU, Weltbank oder UNO bilden, ist nahezu unüberschaubar geworden und die an die quantitative Analyse dieser Daten gestellten Ansprüche sind massiv gestiegen. Dieser Prozess der Quantifizierung der Analyse auf der Basis von Makrodaten wurde insbesondere in der vergleichenden politischen Ökonomie vorangetrieben (Schmidt 1995; Obinger/Wagschal/Kittel 2003), wird aber auch in vielen anderen Bereichen der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft angewendet (Berg-Schlosser/ Müller-Rommel 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Achen, Christopher H. (2002): Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART. In: Annual Review of Political Science 5:423–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adcock, Robert/ Collier, David (2001): Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. In: American Political Science Review 95/3: 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alemann, Ulrich von (Hrsg.) (1995): Politikwissenschaftliche Methoden. Grundriß für Studium und Forschung. Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, James P./ Scruggs, Lyle (2004): Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrialized Societies. In: American Journal of Political Science 48/3: 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Philip (2005): Critical Mass. How One Thing Leads to Another. Arrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, Joachim (2005): Lassen sich Signifikanztests auf Vollerhebungen anwenden? Einige essayistische Anmerkungen. In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46/1: O–1–O–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, Joachim/ Gschwend, Thomas/ Schindler, Delia/ Schnapp, Kai-Uwe (Hrsg.) (2006): Empirische Methoden in der Politikwissenschaft. Neuere qualitative und quantitative Verfahren. Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Schlosser, Dirk/ Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand (2003): Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Ein einführendes Studienbuch (4. Aufl.). Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, Richard A./ Western, Bruce/ Weiss, Robert E. (1995): Statistical Inference for Apparent Populations. In: Sociological Methodology 25:421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brambor, Thomas/ Clark, William Roberts/ Golder, Matt (2005): Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. In: Political Analysis 14/1: 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Kevin A./ Primo, David M. (2007): Modernizing Political Science: A Model-based Approach. In: Perspectives on Politics 5/4.:741–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, Jochen/ Siegel, Nico (Hrsg.) (2007): Investigating Welfare State Change. The’ Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J. (1975): Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. In: American Psychologist 30: 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Deken, Johan/ Kittel, Bernhard (2007): Social Expenditure Under Scrutiny: The Problems of Using Aggregate Spending Data for Assessing Welfare State Dynamics. In: Clasen, Jochen/ Siegel, Nico (Hrsg.): 72–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2005): When Less is More: Selection Problems in Large-N and Small-N Cross-national Comparisons. In: International Sociology 20/2: 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, Bernhard/ Kittel, Bernhard (2005): European Rigidity versus American Flexibility? The Institutional Adaptability of Collective Bargaining. In: Work and Occupations 32/2: 163–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai (Hrsg.) (1961): Complex Organizations: A Sociological Reader. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, Richard P./ Leighton, Robert P./ Sands, Matthew (1963): The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, Robert J. (2002): Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, John (2001): Social Science Methodology. A Criterial Framework. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Nigel/ Troitzsch, Klaus G. (2005): Simulation for the Social Scientist. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granato, Jim/ Scioli, Frank (2004): Puzzles, Proverbs, and Omega Matrices: The Scientific and Social Significance of Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models (EITM). In: Perspectives on Politics 2/2: 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halaby, Charles N. (2004): Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice. In: Annual Review of Sociology 30: 507–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. (2003): Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research. In: Mahoney, James/ Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (Hrsg.): 373–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedstrøm, Peter (2005): Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander/ Kenworthy, Lane (Hrsg.) (i.E.): Method and Substance in Macrocomparative Analysis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, Kevin D. (2002): Econometrics and Reality. In: Mäki, Uskali (Hrsg): 152–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne/ Stephens, John (2001): Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Torben (1999): Contested Economic Institutions. The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jann, Ben (2004): Diagnostik von Regressionsschätzungen bei kleinen Stichproben. In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Sonderheft 44: 421–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kam, Cindy D./ Franzese, Robert J. (2007): Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, Lane (2003): Do Affluent Countries Face an Incomes-Jobs Trade-Off? In: Comparative Political Studies 36/10: 1180–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary/ Keohane, Robert/ Verba, Sidney (1994): Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, Bernhard (2000): Trade Union Bargaining Horizons in Comparative Perspective: The Effects of Encompassing Organization, Unemployment and the Monetary Regime on Wage-pushfulness. In: European Journal of Industrial Relations 6/2: 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, Bernhard (2006): Panel-Analyse. In: Behnke, Joachim/ Gschwend, Thomas/ Schindler, Delia/ Schnapp, Kai-Uwe (Hrsg.): 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, Bernhard (i.E.): Statistical Narratives and the Properties of Macro-level Variables: Labor Market Institutions and Employment Performance in Macrocomparative Research. In: Hicks, Alexander/ Kenworthy, Lane (Hrsg.) (i.E.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F./ Menzel, H. (1961): On the Relationship between Individual and Collective Properties. In: Etzioni, Amitai (Hrsg.): 499–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (1971): Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. In: American Political Science Review 65: 682–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Richard M./ Thelen, Kathleen (1995): Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics. In: Politics and Society 23/3: 337–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James/ Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (Hrsg.) (2003): Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, Uskali (Hrsg.) (2002): Fact and Fiction in Economics. Models, Realism, and Social Construction. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, Renate (Hrsg.) (2002): Akteure, Mechanismen, Modelle: Zur Theoriefähigkeit makro-sozialer Analysen. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Rebecca B. (1999): Methods and Models. A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political Science. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, Herbert/ Wagschal, Uwe/ Kittel, Bernhard (Hrsg.) (2003): Politische Ökonomie. Demokratie und wirtschaftliche Leistungsfähigkeit. Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Torsten/ Tabellini, Guido Enrico (2000): Political Economics. Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam (2004): Institutions Matter? In: Government and Opposition 39/4: 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam/ Teune, Henry (1970): The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, Thomas J. (1976): The Observational Equivalence of Natural and Unnatural Rate Theories of Macroeconomics. In: Journal of Political Economy 84/3: 631–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1970): Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. In: The American Political Science Review 64/4: 1033–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1991): Comparing and Miscomparing. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics 3/3: 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, Andrew (1992): Method in Social Science. A Realist Approach (2nd ed.). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. (2000): The Viability of Advanced Welfare States in the International Economy: Vulnerabilities and Options. In: Journal of European Public Policy 7/2: 190–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz. W. (2002): Kontingente Generalisierung in der Politikforschung. In: Mayntz, Renate (2002): 213–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. (1995): Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft mit Aggregatdaten: Inwieweit beeinflussen Parteien Regierungspolitik? In: Alemann, Ulrich von (Hrsg): 327–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. (1996): When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy. In: European Journal of Political Research 30/3: 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1968): Constructing Social Theories. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, Rein (2007): Predictive vs. Postdictive Models. In: European Political Science 6/2: 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, John W. (1977): Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Michael (2000): Trying to Navigate between Scylla and Charybdis: Misspecified and Unidentified Models in Comparative Politics. In: APSA-Comparative Politics 11: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, Paul (1994): Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, Bruce (1996): Vague Theory and Model Uncertainty in Macrosociology. In: Sociological Methodology 26: 165–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, Bruce/ Jackman, Simon (1994): Bayesian Inference for Comparative Research. In: American Political Science Review 88/2: 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Sven E./ Butler, Daniel M. (2007): A Lot More to Do: The Sensitivity of Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis to Alternative Specifications. In: Political Analysis 15/2: 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael/ Leibfried, Stephan (Hrsg.) (2006): Tranformationen des Staates. Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Politikwissenschaft und Soziologie, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Deustchland

    Bernhard Kittel (Professor für Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, Zuvor Professor für Methoden und Techniken der Sozialwissenschaften, Juniorprofessor für Sozialpolitik, Stipendiat, wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter)

Authors
  1. Bernhard Kittel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Susanne Pickel Gert Pickel Hans-Joachim Lauth Detlef Jahn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kittel, B. (2009). Statistische Erfordernisse und Inferenzschlüsse in makroquantitativ vergleichenden Forschungsdesigns. In: Pickel, S., Pickel, G., Lauth, HJ., Jahn, D. (eds) Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91826-6_14

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16194-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91826-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation