Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Messung der subjektiven Gesundheit: Stand der Forschung und Herausforderungen

  • Chapter
Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit

Die Bedeutung der individuellen Gesundheit wie auch der gesundheitlichen Situation von Bevölkerungsgruppen ist vor dem Hintergrund knapper werdender Ressourcen für Gesundheitsdienstleistungen in den letzten Jahren immer stärker in den Blickpunkt der Öffentlichkeit, der Medien und der politischen Entscheidungsträger gerückt. Epidemiologische Studien zur gesundheitlichen Situation der Bevölkerung bzw. einzelner Bevölkerungsgruppen können durch die Erfassung gesundheitlicher Unterschiede der Identifikation von Risikogruppen und Risikofaktoren aber auch der Bestimmung des Behandlungs- oder Versorgungsbedarfes dienen und z.B. eine Unterversorgung aufdecken. Die Erfassung der Mortalität und Morbidität im Rahmen statistischer Routinedaten etwa ermöglicht es die Bedeutung sozialer Ungleichheit für den Gesundheitszustand der Bevölkerung abzuschätzen. Wiederholte Erhebungen können Gesundheitstrends erkennen lassen, die beispielsweise mit Veränderungen der sozialen Lage von Bevölkerungsgruppen verbunden sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Atteslander P, Kopp M (1995). Befragung. In: Roth E, ed. Sozialwissenschaftliche Methoden: Lehrund Handbuch für Forschung und Praxis (4. ed.). München: Oldenbourg. 146–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bech P (1990). Measurement of psychological distress and well-being. Psychother Psychosom 54: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berra S, Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Tebé C, Bisegger C, Dür W, von Rueden U, Herdman M, Alonso J, Rajmil L, the European KIDSCREEN Group (2007). Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study. BioMed Central Public Health 7: 182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorner JB, Chang C-H, Thissen D, et al. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res 16: S95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE (2004). Computerized adaptive testing and item banking. In: Fayers PM, Hays RD, eds. Assessing Quality of Life. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhmer S, Kohlmann T (2000). Verfahren zur Bewertung von Gesundheitszuständen und Lebensqualität. In: Ravens-Sieberer U, Cieza A, eds. Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin. Konzepte – Methoden – Anwendungen. Landsberg: Ecomed. 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz J, Döring N (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human und Sozialwissenschaftler. (4. ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1989). Forschungsinstrumente zur Erfassung der Lebensqualität bei Krebs – ein Überblick. In: Verres B, Hasenbring M, eds. Psychosoziale Aspekte der Krebsforschung (Psychosoziale Onkologie) Jahrbuch der Medizinischen Psychologie (3. ed.). Berlin: Springer. 45-57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (1997). Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität und subjektive Gesundheit. Überblick über den Stand der Forschung zu einem neuen Evaluationskriterium in der Medizin. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 47: 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M (2000). Lebensqualität – Aktueller Stand und neuere Entwicklungen der internationalen Lebensqualitätsforschung. In: Ravens-Sieberer U, Cieza A, eds. Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin. Konzepte – Methoden – Anwendungen. Landsberg: Ecomed. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buser K, Schneller T, Wildgrube K (2003). Medizinische Psychologie. Medizinische Soziologie (5. ed.). München: Urban & Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchi S, Buddeberg C (2004). Subjektive Krankheitskonzepte – Krankheitsbewältigung. In: Buddeberg C, ed. Psychosoziale Medizin. Berlin: Springer: 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchi S, Scheuer E (2004). Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität. In: Buddeberg C, ed. Psychosoziale Medizin. Berlin: Springer: 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilli G, Shepard LA (1994). Methods for identifying Biased Test Items. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr AJ, Higginson IJ (2001). Are quality of life measures patient centred? Br Med J 322: 1357–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cella DF (1994). Quality of life: Concepts and definition. J Pain Symptom Manage 9: 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coste J, Bouée S, Ecosse E, Leplège A, Pouchot J (2005). Methodological issues in determining the dimensionality of composite health measures using principal component analysis: Case illustration and suggestions for practice. Qual Life Res 14: 641–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton J, Elias M, Wandersman A (2001). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leval N (1995). Scales of depression, ill-being and the quality of life-is there any difference? An essay in taxonomy. Qual Life Res 4: 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT, de Charro FT (2002). Health profiles and health preferences of dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17: 86-92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominick KL, Ahern FM, Gold CH, Heller DA (2002). Relationship of health-related quality of life to health care utilization and mortality among older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 14: 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doward LC, Meads DM, Hanne Thorsen H (2004). Requierements for Quality of Life Instruments in Clinical Research. Value in Health 7: S13-S16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser C, Morse R (2001). A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Arch Dis Child 84: 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson SE, Reise SP (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroQol Group (1990). EuroQol – A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 16: 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayers PM, Sprangers MAG. (2002). Understanding self-rated health. Lancet 359: 187–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipp SH, Aymanns P (1997). Subjektive Krankheitstheorien. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Gesundheitspsychologie: Ein Lehrbuch (2. ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipp SH, Ferring D (1991). Zur inhaltlichen Bestimmung und Erfassung von Lebensqualität im Umfeld schwerer körperlicher Erkrankungen. Praxis der Klinischen Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation 4: 274–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fissini HJ (1997). Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik (2. ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goosens MEJB, Vlaeyen JWS, Rutten- van Mölken MPMH, van der Linden SMJP (1999). Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method? Pain 80: 365-75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner W, Uber A (2000). Gesundheitsökonomische Studien und der Einsatz von Lebensqualitätsindices am Beispiel des LQ-Indexes EQ-5D (EuroQol). In: Ravens-Sieberer U, Cieza A, eds. Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin. Konzepte – Methoden – Anwendungen. Landsberg: Ecomed. 336–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley SM, Raczek AE, Coster WJ, Dumas HM, Fragala-Pinkham MA (2005). Assessing Mobility in Children Using a Computer Adaptive Testing Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86: 932–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart DL, Mioduski JE, Stratford PW (2005). Simulated computerized adaptive tests for measuring functional status were efficient with good discriminant validity in patients with hip, knee, or foot/ankle impairments. J Clin Epidemiol 58: 629–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • , Krakowski, K., Rogers, H.J., Swaminathan, H. (1996). An assessment of Stout’s index of essential unidimensionality. Appl Psychol Measure 20: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herdman M, Rajmil L, Ravens-Sieberer U, Bullinger M, Power M, Alonso J and the European Kidscreen and Disabkids groups (2002). Expert consensus in the development of a European healthrelated quality of life measure for children and adolescents: a Delphi study. Acta Paediatr 91: 1385–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38: 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce CRB, McGee HM, O’Boyle C, eds. (1999). Individual quality of life: Approaches to conceptualisation and assessment. Amsterdam: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RM (1989). Health outcome models for policy analysis. Health Psychol 8: 723–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamnek S (2005). Qualitative Sozialforschung (4. ed). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplege A, Hunt S (1997). The problem of Quality of life in Medicine. JAMA, 278: 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattejat F, Remschmidt H (1998). Assessing the quality of life of children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders – A review. Z Kinder Jug-Psych 26: 183–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maor Y, King M, Olmer L, Mozes B (2001). A comparison of three measures: the time trade-off technique, global health-related quality of life and the SF-36 in dialysis patients. J Clin Epidemiol 54: 565-70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee HM, O’Boyle, CA, Hickeey A, O‘Malley K, Joyce CR. (1991). Assessing the quality of life of the individual: the SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psycol Med 21: 749–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNemar Q (1946). Opinion-attitude methodology. Psychol Bull 43: 289–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier C (1994). Improving the quality of life of people with severe mental disorders. Soc Ind Res 33: 165–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1997). The utility of DALYs for Public health policy and research: a reply. Bull World Health Organ 75: 377–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müters S, Lampert T, Maschewski-Schneider U (2005). Subjektive Gesundheit als Prädiktor für Mortalität. Gesundheitswesen 67: 129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann J von, Morgenstern O (1953). Theory of games and economic behaviour (3. ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IR (1994). Psychometric Theory (3. ed.). New York, NY: McCraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel KK, Veenstra DL, Patrick DL (2003). A review of selected patient generated outcome measures and their application in clinical trials. Value in Health 5: 595–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen C, Schmidt S, Bullinger M (2005). Development and pilot-testing of a health-related quality of life chronic generic module for children and adolescents with chronic health conditions: A European perspective Qual Life Res. 14: 1065–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M (2003). Development of a common instrument for quality of life. A. Nosikov and C. Gudex EUROHIS. Developing Common Instruments for Health Surveys. Amsterdam: IOS Press 57: 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radoschewski M (2000). Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität – Konzepte und Maße. Entwicklungen und Stand im Überblick. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz 43: 165–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch G (1977). On specific objectivity: An attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 14. 58-94

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer U, Auquier P, Erhart M, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Bruil J, Power M, Duer W, Abel T, Czemy L, Mazur J, Czimbalmos A, Tountas Y, Hagquist C, Kilroe J, the European KIDSCREEN Group (2007). The KIDSCREEN-27 Quality of Life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European Countries. Qual Life Res, 16: 1347–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravens Sieberer U, Gosch A, Abel T, Auquier P, Bellach BM, Bruil J, Dür W, Power M, Rajmil L and the European KIDSCREEN Group (2001). Quality of Life in children and adolescents – a european public health perspective. Soz Präventiv Med 46: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Erhart M, Bruil J, Dür W, Auquier P, Power M, Abel T, Czemy L, Mazur J, Czimbalmos A, Tountas Y, Hagquist C and the European KIDSCREEN Group (2005). The KIDSCREEN-52 Quality of life measure for children and adolescents: Development and first results from a European survey. Expert Review Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 5: 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Erhart M, Bruil J, Power M, Dür W, Auquier P, Cloetta B, Czemy L, Mazur J, Czimbalmos A, Tountas Y, Hagquist C, Kilroe J, the European KIDSCREEN Group (2008). The KIDSCREEN-52 Quality of Life measure for children and adolescents: Psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European Countries. Value in Health 11: 645–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer U, the European KIDSCREEN Group (2006). The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires – Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents – handbook. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise SP, Waller NG, Comrey AL (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychol Assess 12: 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson RJ (1995). Environmental and health-related quality of life: Conceptual and methodological similarities. Soc Sci Med 41: 1373–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, Fries JF, Ware JE (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function Item-Bank supports the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 61: 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta DA, Garrat AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: The Patient Generated Index. Med Care 32: 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S, Debensason D, Mühlan H, Petersen C, Power M, Simeoni MC, Bullinger M & the European DISABKIDS Group (2006). The DISABKIDS generic quality of life instrument showed cross-cultural validity. J Clin Epidemiol 59: 587-598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher J, Brähler E (2004). Bezugssysteme von Gesundheit und Krankheit. In: Strauß B, Berger U, Brähler E von Troschke J, eds. Lehrbuch der Medizinischen Psychologie und Medizinischen Soziologie Göttingen: Hogrefe: 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher J, Klaiberg A, Brähler E (2003). Diagnostik von Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden – Eine Einführung. In: Schumacher J, Klaiberg A, Brähler E, eds. Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden. Göttingen: Hogrefe. 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N (1987). Stimmung als Information. Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Stimmungen auf die Bewertung des eigenen Lebens. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Strack F (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgement model of subjective well-being. In: Strack F, Argyle M, Schwarz N, eds. Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz N, Strack F (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In: Kahnemann D, Diener E, Schwarz N, eds. Well-being. The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russel Sage Foundations. 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer R (1983). Befragung. In: Bredenkamp J, Feger H, eds. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Datenerhebung. Göttingen: Hogrefe. 302–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms LJ, Clark LA (2005). Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP). Psychol Assess 17: 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Sprangers MA, Detmar SB, Wever LD, Schornagel JH (1997). Value of caregiver ratings in evaluating the quality of life of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 15: 1206–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer WO, Dobson AJ, Hall J, Chesterman E, Levi J, Shepard R, Battista RN, Catchlove BR (1981). Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. A conscise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chron Dis 34: 585–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa MA, Simonson DC (1996). Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. New Engl J Med 334: 835–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance GW, Thomas W, Sacket D (1972). A utility maximation model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res 7: 118–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Jepson C (2003). Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Qual Life Res 12. 599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Abswoude AH, van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K (2004). A comparative study of test data dimensionality assessment procedures under nonparametric IRT models. Appl Psychol Measure 28: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Lane MM (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3: 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Rueden U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Bisegger C, Ravens-Sieberer U. (2006). Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: results from a European study. J Epidemiol Community Health.; 60:130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer H, Dorans NJ, Eignor D, Flaugher R, Green BF, Mislevy RJ, Lynne Steinberg L, Thissen D (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: A primer (2. ed.). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter OB, Becker J, Fliege H, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Walter M, Klapp BF, Rose M (2005). Developmental steps for a computer adaptive test for anxiety (A-CAT). Diagnostica 51: 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Bayliss MS, Batenhorst A, Dahlöf CG, Tepper S, Dowson A (2003). Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual Life Res 12: 935–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J.E., Gandek, M.S. (1999). How to score and interpret single-item Health staus measures: A manual for Users of the SF-8 Health Survey (with a Supplement on the SF-6 Health Survey). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Boston: Health Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34: 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36®): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30: 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasem J, Hessel F (2000). Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie. In: Ravens-Sieberer U, Cieza A, eds. Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin. Landsberg: Ecomed: 319-35

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 41: 1403–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1998a). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQoL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 46: 1569–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1998b) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQoL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 28: 551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB, Cleary PD (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 273: 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Moncur M, Gabriel S, Tosteson AN (2001). Assessing values for health: numeracy matters. Med Decis Making 21: 382-390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemp-Stutz E, Buddeberg-Fischer B. (2004). Gesundheit und Krankheit. In: Buddeberg, C ed. Psychosoziale Medizin. Berlin: Springer: 309–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegelmann JP (2002). Gesundheits- und Krankheitsbegriffe. In: Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M, Weber H, eds. Gesundheitspsychologie von A bis Z: Ein Handwörterbuch. Göttingen: Hogrefe: 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo BD (1999). A Handbook on Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF). Ottawa: National Defense Headquarters.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Michael Erhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nora Wille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Matthias Richter Klaus Hurrelmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erhart, M., Wille, N., Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2009). Die Messung der subjektiven Gesundheit: Stand der Forschung und Herausforderungen. In: Richter, M., Hurrelmann, K. (eds) Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91643-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91643-9_19

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16084-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91643-9

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation