Skip to main content

Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Urology
  • 1388 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter on prostate surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy describes anatomic points and practical surgical options of fascial dissection. Clear understanding of the periprostatic fascia helps in identifying the correct planes of surgical dissection and in communication between surgeons. Results are related to the identification of the multilayered prostatic fascia (PF), which permits definition of dissection planes for complete oncologic excision of the prostate and preservation of both the external urinary sphincter responsible for urinary continence and the autonomic nerves responsible for erectile function and urinary control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):179–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol. 2016;70(2):301–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rassweiler J, Laguna P, Chlosta P, Pansadoro V, Gaboardi F, Stolzenburg JU, et al. ESUT expert group on laparoscopy proposes uniform terminology during radical prostatectomy: we need to speak the same language. Eur Urol. 2013;64(1):97–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int. 2004;94(7):1071–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Takenaka A, Hara R, Soga H, Murakami G, Fujisawa M. A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers. BJU Int. 2005;95(6):766–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh PC, Partin AW. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Peters CA, Novick AC, Partin AW, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology, vol. 3. 9th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. p. 2956–78.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Myers RP, Villers A. Anatomic considerations in radical prostatectomy. In: Kirby RS, Partin AW, Feneley M, Kellogg Parsons J, editors. Prostate cancer; principles and practice, vol. 1. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis; 2006. p. 701–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):629–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M, Sarle R, Vallancien G, Delmas V, et al. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2003;43(5):444–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2006;49(1):38–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Budaus L, Isbarn H, Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Haese A, Steuber T, et al. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2009;56(2):317–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2291–6. discussion 6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Secin FP, Karanikolas N, Gopalan A, Bianco FJ, Shayegan B, Touijer K, et al. The anterior layer of Denonvilliers’ fascia: a common misconception in the laparoscopic prostatectomy literature. J Urol. 2007;177(2):521–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen ME, Schaeffer EM, Marschke P, Walsh PC. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2557–64. discussion 64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganzer R, Stolzenburg JU, Neuhaus J, Weber F, Burger M, Brundl J. Is the striated urethral sphincter at risk by standard suture ligation of the dorsal vascular complex in radical prostatectomy? An anatomic study. Urology. 2014;84(6):1453–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Villers A, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Boccon-Gibod L, Stamey TA. Invasion of Denonvilliers’ fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 1993;149(4):793–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muraoka K, Hinata N, Morizane S, Honda M, Sejima T, Murakami G, et al. Site-dependent and interindividual variations in Denonvilliers’ fascia: a histological study using donated elderly male cadavers. BMC Urol. 2015;15:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. van Ophoven A, Roth S. The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medico-historical debate. J Urol. 1997;157(1):3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kourambas J, Angus DG, Hosking P, Chou ST. A histological study of Denonvilliers’ fascia and its relationship to the neurovascular bundle. Br J Urol. 1998;82(3):408–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Villers A, Stamey TA, Yemoto C, Rischmann P, McNeal JE. Modified extrafascial radical retropubic prostatectomy technique decreases frequency of positive surgical margins in T2 cancers <2 cm (3). Eur Urol. 2000;38(1):64–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McNeal JE, Villers AA, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Capsular penetration in prostate cancer. Significance for natural history and treatment. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14(3):240–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, Robinson BD, Shevchuk MM, Durand M, et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):984–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Myers RP. Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy--anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology. 2002;59(4):472–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yucel S, Baskin LS. Neuroanatomy of the male urethra and perineum. BJU Int. 2003;92(6):624–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McNeal JE. The prostate and prostatic urethra: a morphologic synthesis. J Urol. 1972;107(6):1008–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnauld Villers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Villers, A., Walz, J. (2018). Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65864-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65864-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65863-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65864-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics