Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Repair of Paraesophageal Hiatus Hernia: Suture Cruroplasty or Prosthetic Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hiatal Hernia Surgery

Abstract

Since the introduction of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in 1991, the repair of very large paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PHH), encountered in approximately 50% of laparoscopic antireflux surgical practice, seem to pose a challenging predicament for surgeons. In the chronic setting there is debate about indications for surgery and what is the best operative approach. The issue of which technique i.e. laparoscopic, robotic, transthoracic or transabdominal produces better surgical outcomes for these large hiatal hernia remains contentious. Furthermore, there also remains a debate regarding the best way to close the crural pillars of these large hiatal hernias i.e. either using sutures (tension producing) or mesh (tensionless). This is because the dehiscence of crural repair may lead to intrathoracic migration of the wrap, recurrence of reflux and/or dysphagia requiring difficult revisional surgery. The current chapter will address an area of controversy i.e. the use of prosthetic material (mesh) at the esophageal hiatus and whenever possible will compare it to suture cruroplasty based on up-to-date clinical literature. The objective of the following discussion is to discuss the clinical outcomes, safety and effectiveness and complications of the two commonly used methods for elective surgical repair of large hiatal hernias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engstrom C, Cai W, Irvine T, Devitt PG, Thompson SK, Game PA, Bessell JR, Jamieson GG, Watson DI. Twenty years of experience with laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1415–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akerland A, Onnell H, Key E. Hernia diaphragmatica hiatus oesophagei vom anastomischen und rontgenologischen gesichtspunct. Acta Radiol. 1926;6:3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Nathanson LK. Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia. Am J Surg. 1992;163:425–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schieman C, Grondin SC. Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies. Thorac Surg Clin. 2009;19:473–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Huprich JE, Quek M, Hagen JA, Crookes PF, Theisen J, DeMeester SR, Sillin LF, Bremner CG. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective follow-up reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:554–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattar SG, Bowers SP, Galloway KD, Hunter J, Smith C. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraoesopahgeal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:745–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Soricelli E, Basso N, Genco A, Cipriano M. Long-term results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2499–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dallemagne B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C. Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg. 2011;253:291–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, Brunt ML, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, Polissar NL, Neradilek MB, Mitsumori LM, Rohrmann CA, Swanstrom LL. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:461–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tatum RP, Shalhub S, Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA. Complications of PTFE mesh at the diaphragmatic hiatus. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:953–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oor JE, Koetje JH, Roks DJ, Nieuwenhuijs V, Hazebroek E. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in the elderly patient. World J Surg. 2016;40:1404–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bashashati M, Sarosiek I, McCallum RW. Epidemiology and mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly: a perspective. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1380:230–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hallan A, Bomme M, Hveem K, Møller-Hansen J, Ness-Jensen E. Risk factors on the development of new-onset gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. A population-based prospective cohort study: the HUNT study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okimoto E, Ishimura N, Morito Y, Mikami H, Shimura S, Uno G, Tamagawa Y, Aimi M, Oshima N, Kawashima K, Kazumori H, Sato S, Ishihara S, Kinoshita Y. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children, adults, and elderly in the same community. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:1140–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmadi B, Alimohammadian M, Yaseri M, Majidi A, Boreiri M, Islami F, Poustchi H, Derakhshan MH, Feizesani A, Pourshams A, Abnet CC, Brennan P, Dawsey SM, Kamangar F, Boffetta P, Sadjadi A, Malekzadeh R. Multimorbidity: epidemiology and risk factors in the Golestan cohort study, Iran: a crosssectional analysis. Medicine. 2016;95:e2756.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petrick JL, Nguyen T, Cook MB. Temporal trends of esophageal disorders by age in the Cerner health facts database. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26:151–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carré IJ, Johnston BT, Thomas PS, Morrison PJ. Familial hiatal hernia in a large five generation family confirming true autosomal dominant inheritance. Gut. 1999;45:649–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Larusson HJ, Zingg U, Hahnloser D, Delport K, Seifert B, Oertli D. Predictive factors for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: age, ASA score and operation type influence morbidity. World J Surg. 2009;33:980–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW. Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg. 2002;236:492–500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheff SR, Kothari SN. Repair of the giant hiatal hernia. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants. 2010;20:139–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jutric Z, Louie BE. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:436–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisichella PM. A synopsis of techniques for paraesophageal hernia repair: different approaches to current controversies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:423–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maziak DE, Todd TR, Pearson FG. Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:53–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DeMeester SR. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: critical steps and adjunct techniques to minimize recurrence. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gouvas N, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis E, Zervakis N, Pechlivanides G, Xynos E. Simple suture or prosthesis hiatal closure in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia: a retrospective cohort study. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:69–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Braghetto I, Korn O, Csendes A, Burdiles P, Valladares H, Brunet L. Postoperative results after laparoscopic approach for treatment of large hiatal hernias: is mesh always needed? Is the addition of an antireflux procedure necessary? Int Surg. 2010;95:80–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Muller-Stich BP, Holzinger F, Kapp T, Klaiber C. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: long-term outcome with the focus on the influence of mesh reinforcement. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:380–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S. Suture Cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal Herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2016;263:258–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Furnee E, Hazebroek E. Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3998–4008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carlson MA, Richards CG, Frantzides CT. Laparoscopic prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal herniorrhaphy. Dig Surg. 1999;16:407–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Stavropoulos GP. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg. 2002;137:649–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, Asche KU, Pointner R. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg. 2005;140:40–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Asti E, Lovece A, Bonavina L, Milito P, Sironi A, Bonitta G, Siboni S. Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5404–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zaninotto G, Portale G, Costantini M, Fiamingo P, Rampado S, Guirroli E, Nicoletti L, Ancona E. Objective follow-up after laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia. Assessment of safety and durability. World J Surg. 2007;31:2177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mimatsu K, Oida T, Kida K, Fukino N, Kawasaki A, Kano H, Kuboi Y, Amano S. Simultaneous laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy to treat an elderly patient with a large paraesophageal hernia: a case report. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7:165–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Leeder PC, Smith G, Dehn TC. Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1372–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hui TT, Thoman DS, Spyrou M, Phillips EH. Mesh crural repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias. Am Surg. 2001;67:1170–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Morino M, Giaccone C, Pellegrino L, Rebecchi F. Laparoscopic management of giant hiatal hernia: factors influencing long-term outcome. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1011–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Goers TA, Cassera MA, Dunst CM, Swanström LL. Paraesophageal hernia repair with biomesh does not increase postoperative dysphagia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1743–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ringley CD, Bochkarev V, Ahmed SI, Vitamvas ML, Oleynikov D. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with human acellular dermal matrix patch: our initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006;192:767–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG, Smith L, Woods SD, Aly A, Gan S, Game PA, Jamieson GG. Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatal hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261:282–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Müller-Stich BP, Kenngott HG, Gondan M, Gondan M, Stock C, Linke GR, Fritz F, Nickel F, Diener MK, Gutt CN, Wente M, Büchler MW, Fischer L. Use of mesh in laparoscopic Paraesophageal hernia repair: a meta-analysis and risk-benefit analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tam V, Winger DG, Nason KS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2016;211:226–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tanrikulu Y, Kar F, Yalcin B, Yilmaz G, Temi V, Cagsar M. The importance of the mesh shape in preventing recurrence after Nissen fundoplication. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:9684–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Carlson MA, Condon RE, Ludwig KA, Schulte WJ. Management of intrathoracic stomach with polypropylene mesh prosthesis reinforced transabdominal hiatus hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:227–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schneider R, Herrington JL Jr, Granda AM. Marlex mesh in repair of a diaphragmatic defect later eroding into the distal esophagus and stomach. Am Surg. 1979;45:337–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Michael Brunt L, Hunter JG, Demeester TR, Swanstrom LL, Daniel Smith C, Filipi CJ. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1219–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Mesh-reinforced hiatal hernia repair: a review on the effect on postoperative dysphagia and recurrence. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2012;397:19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Frantzides CT, Carlson MA, Loizides S, Papafili A, Luu M, Roberts J, Zeni T, Frantzides A. Hiatal hernia repair with mesh: a survey of SAGES members. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1017–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Grubnik VV, Malynovskyy AV. Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias: new classification supported by long-term results. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4337–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Huntington TR. Laparoscopic mesh repair of the esophageal hiatus. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184:399–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kehdy F. Current management of paraesophageal hernia. Am Surg. 2011;77:1565–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmülling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82:216–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Obeid NM, Velanovich V. The choice of primary repair or mesh repair for paraesophageal hernia: a decision analysis based on utility scores. Ann Surg. 2013;257:655–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammed Ashraf Memon M.B.B.S., F.A.C.S., F.R.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siddaiah-Subramanya, M., Memon, B., Memon, M.A. (2018). Laparoscopic Repair of Paraesophageal Hiatus Hernia: Suture Cruroplasty or Prosthetic Repair. In: Memon, M. (eds) Hiatal Hernia Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64003-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64003-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64002-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64003-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics