Abstract
Driving vehicles are part of an ultimate technology in modern societies allowing the user to travel and navigate short distances within urban regions as well as long routes within large-scale environments. Thereby, the ability to drive enables us to enlarge our own, biologically defined and restricted range of mobility in a nearly unlimited manner. Driving, that is, controlling a vehicle in a visually cluttered environment, involves the simultaneous use of central and peripheral vision and the execution of primary and secondary tasks (both visual and non-visual). As a vehicle moves through the environment, the visual input is rapidly changing and the driver is therefore often uncertain as to when and where a critical visual event will occur. Consequently, appropriate gaze behavior is a necessary cognitive tool for a safe drive in order to maximize information acquisition together with adequate interpretations and predictions of environmental situations based on memories.
In this chapter, the overall demands of driving are summarized and discussed in relationship with sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. Furthermore, several options to assess driving fitness in real (on-road) and virtual (simulator) environments together with the present regulations concerning the permission to drive are discussed respecting healthy drivers as well as visually impaired hemianopic patients. Finally, conclusions are provided by illustrating the complexity of the task of driving that leads to an overall high variability of behavioral strategies, which is in cause manifested in large individual differences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Owsley C, McGwin Jr G. Vision and driving. Vision Res. 2010;50(23):2348–61.
Land MF. Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006;25(3):296–324.
Bowers A, Mandel A, Goldstein R, Peli E. Driving with hemianopia, I: detection performance in a driving simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(11):5137–47.
Kasneci E, Sippel K, Aehling K, Heister M, Rosenstiel W, Schiefer U, et al. Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87470.
Kübler T, Kasneci E, Rosenstiel W, Aehling K, Heister M, Nagel K, Schiefer U, Papageorgiou E. Driving with homonymous visual field defects: driving performance and compensatory gaze movements. J Eye Mov Res. 2015;8(5):1–11.
Papageorgiou E, Hardiess G, Ackermann H, Wiethoelter H, Dietz K, Mallot H, et al. Collision avoidance in persons with homonymous visual field defects un-der virtual reality conditions. Vision Res. 2012;52(1):20–30.
Machner B, Sprenger A, Kömpf D, Sander T, Heide W, Kimmig H, et al. Visual search disorders beyond pure sensory failure in patients with acute homonymous visual field defects. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(13):2704–11.
Martin T, Riley M, Kelly K, Hayhoe M, Huxlin K. Visually-guided behavior of homonymous hemianopes in a naturalistic task. Vision Res. 2007;47(28):3434–46.
Papageorgiou E, Hardiess G, Mallot H, Schiefer U. Gaze patterns predicting successful collision avoidance in patients with homonymous visual field defects. Vision Res. 2012;65:25–37.
Hardiess G, Mallot H. Task-dependent representation of moving objects within working memory in obstacle avoidance. Strabismus. 2010;18(3):78–82.
Hardiess G, Hansmann-Roth S, Mallot H. Gaze movements and spatial working memory in collision avoidance: a traffic intersection task. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013;7:62.
Henderson J. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7(11):498–504.
Kiyonaga A, Egner T. Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20(2):228–42.
Droll J, Hayhoe M. Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007;33(6):1352–65.
Hardiess G, Gillner S, Mallot H. Head and eye movements and the role of memory limitations in a visual search paradigm. J Vis. 2008;8(1):1–13.
Casson EJ, Racette L. Vision standards for driving in Canada and the United states. A review for the Canadian ophthalmological society. Can J Ophthalmol. 2000;35(4):192–203.
Silveira S, Jolly N, Heard R, Clunas NJ, Kay L. Current licensing authority standards for peripheral visual field and safe on-road senior aged automobile driving performance. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007;35(7):612–20.
International Council of Ophthalmology. Visual standards: vision requirements for driving safety. International Council of Ophthalmology. 2006. Retrieved from http://www.icoph.org/pdf/visionfordriving.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2016.
Tant M, Brouwer W, Cornelissen F, Kooijman A. Driving and visuospatial performance in people with hemianopia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2002;12(5):419–37.
Wood JM, McGwin Jr G, Elgin J, Vaphiades MS, Braswell RA, DeCarlo DK, et al. On-road driving performance by persons with hemianopia and quadrantanopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(2):577–85.
Szlyk JP, Brigell M, Seiple W. Effects of age and hemianopic visual field loss on driving. Optom Vis Sci. 1993;70(12):1031–7.
Tant M, Cornelissen F, Kooijman A, Brouwer WH. Hemianopic visual field defects elicit hemianopic scanning. Vision Res. 2002;42(10):1339–48.
Lövsund P, Hedin A, Törnros J. Effects on driving performance of visual field defects: a driving simulator study. Accid Anal Prev. 1991;23(4):331–42.
Bowers AR, Ananyev E, Mandel AJ, Goldstein RB, Peli E. Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(3):1540–8.
Alberti CF, Peli E, Bowers A. Driving with Hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(1):368–74.
Wood JM, McGwin Jr G, Elgin J, Vaphiades MS, Braswell RA, DeCarlo DK, et al. Hemianopic and quadrantanopic field loss, eye and head movements, and driving. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1220–5.
Coeckelbergh TR, Brouwer WH, Cornelissen FW, Van Wolffelaar P, Kooijman AC. The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(11):1509–16.
Schulte T, Strasburger H, Muller-Oehring EM, Kasten E, Sabel BA. Automobile driving performance of brain-injured patients with visual field defects. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78:136–42.
Lundqvist A, Gerdle B, Ronnberg J. Neuropsychological aspects of driving after a stroke – in the simulator and on the road. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2000;14(2):135–50.
Bowers AR, Mandel AJ, Goldstein RB, Peli E. Driving with hemianopia, II: lane position and steering in a driving simulator. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(12):6605–13.
Papageorgiou E, Hardiess G, Wiethölter H, Ackermann H, Dietz K, Mallot HA, Schiefer U. The neural correlates of impaired collision avoidance in hemianopic patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(3):e198–205.
Hardiess G, Papageorgiou E, Schiefer U, Mallot HA. Functional compensation of visual field deficits in hemianopic patients under the influence of different task demands. Vision Res. 2010;50(12):1158–72.
Kübler TC, Kasneci E, Rosenstiel W, Schiefer U, Nagel K, Papageorgiou E. Stress-indicators and exploratory gaze for the analysis of hazard perception in patients with visual field loss. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014;24:231–43.
Hamel J, Kraft A, Ohl S, De Beukelaer S, Audebert HJ, Brandt SA. Driving simulation in the clinic: testing visual exploratory behavior in daily life activities in patients with visual field defects. J Vis Exp. 2012;67:e4427.
Kasneci E, Sippel K, Heister M, Aehling K, Rosenstiel W, Schiefer U, Papageorgiou E. Homonymous visual field loss and its impact on visual exploration: A supermarket study. Translational vision science & technology. 2014;3(6):2–2.
Owsley C, Wood JM, McGwin Jr G. A roadmap for interpreting the literature on vision and driving. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(3):250–62.
de Haan GA, Melis-Dankers BJ, Brouwer WH, Bredewoud RA, Tucha O, Heutink J. Car driving performance in hemianopia: an on-road driving study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(10):6482–9.
Elgin J, McGwin G, Wood JM, Vaphiades MS, Braswell RA, et al. Evaluation of on-road driving in people with evaluation of on-road driving in people with hemianopia and quadrantanopia. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(2):268–78.
Bowers AR, Tant M, Peli E. A pilot evaluation of on-road detection performance by drivers with hemianopia using oblique peripheral prisms. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:176806.
Racette L, Casson EJ. The impact of visual field loss on driving performance: evidence from on-road driving assessments. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(8):668–74.
Pflugshaupt T, von Wartburg R, Wurtz P, Chaves S, Déruaz A, Nyffeler T, von Arx S, et al. Linking physiology with behaviour: functional specialisation of the visual field is reflected in gaze patterns during visual search. Vision Res. 2009;49(2):237–48.
Tatler BW. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. J Vis. 2007;7(14):4.1–17.
Vaphiades MS, Kline LB, McGwin Jr G, Owsley C, Shah R, Wood JM. Prediction of driving safety in individuals with homonymous hemianopia and quadrantanopia from clinical neuroimaging. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:754042.
Tafaj E, Hempel S, Heister M, Aehling K, Rosenstiel W, Schaeffel F, et al. A new method for assessing the exploratory field of view (EFOV). In: Proceedings of the international conference on health informatics (BIOSTEC 2013). 2013. p. 5–11.
Smith M, Mole CD, Kountouriotis GK, Chisholm C, Bhakta B, Wilkie RM. Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection? Br J Occup Ther. 2015;78(2):85–95.
Bowers AR, Alberti CF, Hwang AD, Goldstein R, Peli E. Pilot study of gaze scanning and intersection detection failures by drivers with hemianopia. In: Proceedings of the eighth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design. New York: Bolton Landing; 2015. p. 240–6.
Bahnemann M, Hamel J, De Beukelaer S, Ohl S, Kehrer S, Audebert H, et al. Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation. J Neurol. 2015;262(2):316–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kasneci, E., Hardiess, G. (2017). Driving with Homonymous Visual Field Defects. In: Skorkovská, K. (eds) Homonymous Visual Field Defects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52284-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52284-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52282-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52284-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)