Skip to main content

Neurological and Neuropsychological Investigation in Patients with Homonymous Visual Field Defects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Homonymous Visual Field Defects

Abstract

Visual information is transferred via the optic pathway and processed by an interaction of the striate cortex with visual associative areas. These areas evaluate different properties of the signal and contribute to an overall perception of the visual environment. Lesions of associative cortices in humans cause the so-called central visual disorders that may accompany homonymous visual field defects. An understanding of the functions of these areas is important, as many of these patients will first contact an ophthalmologist, usually with vague complaints that may be difficult to specifically define. This chapter gives an overview of central visual disorders that can be found in patients with homonymous visual field defects and of the principles of neurological and neuropsychological examination in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bülthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol. 1994;4(7):604–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Girkin CA, Miller NR. Central disorders of vision in humans. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;45(5):379–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser JA, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Disorders of the optic tract, radiation, and occipital lobe. Handb Clin Neurol. 2011;102:205–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spector RH. Visual fields. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kerkhoff G, Bucher L. Line bisection as an early method to assess homonymous hemianopia. Cortex. 2008;44(2):200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lezak M, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. BDAE-3 Long form stimulus cards picture book 11853. In: Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. 3rd ed. (BDAE-3). Austin: PRO-ED; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chechlacz M, Rotshtein P, Humphreys GW. Neuroanatomical dissections of unilateral visual neglect symptoms: ALE meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:230. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00230.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gauthier L, DeHaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;11(23):49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Strauss E, Sherman EM, Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests, administration, norms and commentary. 3rd ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller NR. Neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of psychogenic disease. Semin Neurol. 2006;26(3):310–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodwin D. Homonymous hemianopia: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;22(8):1919–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kedar S, Zhang X, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Congruency in homonymous hemianopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(5):772–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang X, Kedar S, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. Neurology. 2006;66(6):906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Misra M, Rath S, Mohanty AB. Anton syndrome and cortical blindness due to bilateral occipital infarction. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1989;37(4):196.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Joseph R. Confabulation and delusional denial: frontal lobe and lateralized influences. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42(3):507–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lessel S. Higher diorders of visual function: negative phenomena. In: Glaser J, Smith JM, editors. Neuro-opthalmology, vol. 8. St. Louis: Mosby; 1975. p. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brázdil M, Kuba R, Daniel P, Sochůrková D, Dobsík M, Rektor I. Covert vision sign. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(3):316–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiskrantz L. Blindsight revisited. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996;6(2):215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stoerig P. Blindsight, conscious vision, and the role of primary visual cortex. Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:217–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fendrich R, Wessinger CM, Gazzaniga MS. Residual vision in a scotoma: implications for blindsight. Science. 1992;258(5087):1489–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cowey A, Stoerig P. The neurobiology of blindsight. Trends Neurosci. 1991;14(4):140–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeki S. A century of cerebral achromatopsia. Brain. 1990;113(Pt 6):1721–77. (Review).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paulson HL, Galetta SL, Grossman M, Alavi A. Hemiachromatopsia of unilateral occipitotemporal infarcts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118(4):518–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller NR, Newman NJ. Central disorders of visual function. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, editors. The essentials: Walsh & Hoytʼs clinical neuro-ophthalmology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 369–408.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cowey A, Heywood CA. There’s more to colour than meets the eye. Behav Brain Res. 1995;71(1–2):89–100. Review.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meadows JC. Disturbed perception of colours associated with localized cerebral lesions. Brain. 1974;97(4):615–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zihl J, von Cramon D, Mai N, Schmid C. Disturbance of movement vision after bilateral posterior brain damage. Further evidence and follow up observations. Brain. 1919;114(Pt 5):2235–52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Haxby JV, Grady CL, Horwitz B, Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M, Carson RE, et al. Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(5):1621–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. van Essen DC, Anderson CH, Felleman DJ. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science. 1992;255(5043):419–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bálint R. [Paralysis of visual perception]. Seelenlähmung des “Schauens,” optische Ataxie, räumliche Störung der Aufmerksamkeit. Monatszeitschrift Psychiatr Neurol. 1909;25:51–81. [Article in German].

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vallar G. Spatial neglect, Bálint-Homes’ and Gerstmann’s syndrome, and other spatial disorders. CNS Spectr. 2007;12(7):527–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Trobe JD. The neurology of vision. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Andersen RA, Andersen KN, Hwang EJ, Hauschild M. Optic ataxia: from Bálint’s syndrome to the parietal reach region. Neuron. 2014;81(5):967–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kinsbourne M. A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1970;95:143–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Heilman KM, Valenstein E, Watson RT. Neglect and related disorders. Semin Neurol. 2000;20(4):463–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:569–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Verdon V, Schwartz S, Lovblad KO, Hauert CA, Vuilleumier P. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 3):880–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brown AC. Professor A.C. Brown physiology & neuroscience web sites. http://www.acbrown.com/neuroscience. 2011. Accessed 6 Mar 2016.

  40. Devinsky O, Farah MJ, Barr WB. Chapter 21 Visual agnosia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;88:417–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Damasio AR, Damasio H, Van Hoesen GW. Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology. 1982;32(4):331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Damasio AR, Damasio H. The anatomic basis of pure alexia. Neurology. 1983;33(12):1573–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Pail MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pail, M., Goldemundová, S., Skorkovská, K., Brázdil, M. (2017). Neurological and Neuropsychological Investigation in Patients with Homonymous Visual Field Defects. In: Skorkovská, K. (eds) Homonymous Visual Field Defects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52284-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52284-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52282-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52284-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics