Skip to main content

Suspicious for Malignancy (SFM)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology

Abstract

Cytologists interpret cells differently when features overlap with malignancy. The distinction between suspicious for malignancy (SFM) and malignant (MAL) depends on confidence in morphological and ancillary test findings, available clinical data and the experience of the reporting pathologist. This chapter provides an approach to this category with the option to issue a preliminary report of suspicious for malignancy (SFM) pending additional studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davidson B, Firat P, Michael CW. Serous effusions: etiology, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandra A, Cross P, Denton K, et al. The BSCC code of practice–exfoliative cytopathology (excluding gynecological cytopathology). Cytopathology. 2009;20(4):211–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnston WW. The malignant pleural effusion. A review of cytopathologic diagnoses of 584 specimens from 472 consecutive patients. Cancer. 1985;56(4):905–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu C. Cytologic detection of malignancy in pleural effusion: a review of 5,255 samples from 3,811 patients. Diagn Cytopathol. 1987;3(1):8–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Raab SS. Significance of atypical cells in cytologic serous fluid specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111(1):11–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tabatabai ZL, Nayar R, Souers RJ, Crothers BA, Davey DD. Performance characteristics of body fluid cytology: analysis of 344,380 responses from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(1):53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurtycz DFI, Crothers BA, Schmitt F, Chandra A. International system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology: initial project survey. Acta Cytol. 2019;63(Suppl1):13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta S, Sodhani P, Jain S. Cytomorphological profile of neoplastic effusions: an audit of 10 years with emphasis on uncommonly encountered malignancies. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8:602–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Esteban JM, Yokota S, Husain S, Battifora H. Immunocytochemical profile of benign and carcinomatous effusions. A practical approach to difficult diagnosis. Am J Clin Path. 1990;94(6):698–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tickman RJ, Cohen C, Varna VA, Fekete PS, DeRose PB. Distinction of carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Usefulness of immunohistochemistry. Acta Cytol. 1990;34(4):491–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Athanassiadou P, Kavantzas N, Davaris P, et al. Diagnostic approach of effusion cytology using computerized image analysis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21(1):49–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassen D, Nayak S, Li XC, et al. Clinical decision support system (CDSS) for the classification of atypical cells in pleural effusions. Procedia Computer Sci. 2013;20:379–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antonangelo L, Rosolen D, Bottura G, et al. Cytology and DNA ploidy techniques in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. Eur Resp J. 2012;40:4625.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kayser K, Blum S, Beyer M, Haroske G, Kunze KD, Meyer W. Routine DNA cytometry of benign and malignant pleural effusions by means of the remote quantitation server Euroquant: a prospective study. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53(10):760–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Illei PB, Ladanyi M, Rusch VW, Zakowski MF. The use of CDKN2A deletion as a diagnostic marker for malignant mesothelioma in body cavity effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2003;99(1):51–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sundling KE, Cibas ES. Ancillary studies in pleural, pericardial, and peritoneal effusion cytology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(Suppl 8):590–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Das DK. Serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: a review. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(5):335–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Czader M, Ali SZ. Flow cytometry as an adjunct to cytomorphologic analysis of serous effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;29(2):74–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Savvidou K, Dimitrakopoulou A, Kafasi N, et al. Diagnostic role of cytology in serous effusions of patients with hematologic malignancies. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019;47(5):404–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bangerter M, Hildebrand A, Griesshammer M. Combined cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic analysis in the diagnostic workup of lymphomatous effusions. Acta Cytol. 2001;45(3):307–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bode-Lesniewska B. Flow cytometry and effusions in lymphoproliferative processes and other hematologic neoplasias. Acta Cytol. 2016;60(4):354–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mårtensson G, Pettersson K, Thiringer G. Differentiation between malignant and non-malignant pleural effusion. Eur J Respir Dis. 1985;67(5):326–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Farahani S, Baloch Z. Are we ready to develop a tiered scheme for the effusion cytology? A comprehensive review and analysis of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019;47(11):1145–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Valerio E, Nunes W, Cardoso J, et al. A 2-year retrospective study on pleural effusions: a cancer Centre experience. Cytopathology. 2019;30(6):607–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mikou, P., Engels, M., Roy-Chowdhuri, S., Santis, G. (2020). Suspicious for Malignancy (SFM). In: Chandra, A., Crothers, B., Kurtycz, D., Schmitt, F. (eds) The International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53908-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53908-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53907-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53908-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics