Skip to main content

Fluorescence Made Easier: Fluorescence Techniques for the Novice Episode 3:. Avoiding Those Pesky Artifacts: Sources of Error in Spectra and Steady State Measurements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reviews in Fluorescence 2017

Part of the book series: Reviews in Fluorescence ((RFLU))

Abstract

For those contemplating employing fluorescence methods in their experiments, there are some potential artifacts and sources of error that can invalidate results. With a little care, these artifacts can be avoided to produce the kind of results that will make the reviewers jump for joy (and accept your paper). We will cover some sources of error arising from issues arising from the sample itself, and basic problems with fluorometers. At the end we have a handy checklist for when your spectrum comes out looking really messed up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen RF, Knutson JR (1988) Mechanism of fluorescence concentration quenching of carboxyfluorescein in liposomes: energy transfer to nonfluorescent dimers. Anal Biochem 172(1):61–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheong WF, Prahl SA et al (1990) A review of the optical properties of biological tissues. IEEE J Quantum Electron 26:2166–2185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Engstrom RW (1980) RCA photomultiplier handbook. RCA Solid State Division, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., E. T. D (2016) Photomultiplier tubes and related products. Hamamtsu Photonics K.K, Iwata City

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moore JH, Davis CC et al (1983) Building scientific apparatus: a practical guide to design and construction. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ntziachristos V (2006) Fluorescence molecular imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 8:1–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Plant AL (1986) Mechanism of concentration quenching of a xanthene dye encapsulated in phospholipid vesicles. Photochem Photobiol 44(4):453–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Scarlata S, Thompson RB (2017) Fluorescence made easier: fluorescence techniques for the novice. Episode 2: Using fluorescence anisotropy or polarization to view intermolecular associations. In: Geddes CD (ed) Reviews in fluorescence 2016. Springer, Cham, pp 9–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson RB (1994) Red and near-infrared fluorometry. In: Lakowicz JR (ed) Topics in fluorescence spectroscopy Vol. 4: Probe design and chemical sensing, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 151–181

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson RB, Scarlata S (2017) Fluorescence made easier: fluorescence techniques for the novice. Episode 1: The Basics. In: Geddes CD (ed) Reviews in fluorescence 2016. Springer, Cham, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turro NJ (1978) Modern molecular photochemistry. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wolfbeis OS (1985) The fluorescence of organic natural products. In: Schulman SG (ed) Molecular luminescence spectroscopy methods and applications: part I. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 167–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

RBT wishes to belatedly thank Peter M. Torgerson (among many who taught him fluorescence) for the concept of the Golden Rules.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard B. Thompson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Handy Checklist for Figuring Out Why Your Spectrum Looks Weird

Handy Checklist for Figuring Out Why Your Spectrum Looks Weird

You have your sample in your fluorometer and have figured out the wavelength to excite the fluorophore and the emission wavelengths you should scan, but instead of obtaining the nice Gaussian-shaped curve you expect, you get something insane. Here are some problems that might happen and how to fix them (which will save you time reading the text).

  1. 1.

    I don’t have a signal!

  • Make sure your instrument is on and light is reaching the cuvette (this can be done by moving the monochromator to 500 nm, opening the top of the sample compartment and checking to see a beam of green light with a business card. If you don’t see light, make sure everything is ON, shutters are open, etc.

    • If you see a nice green beam going through your cuvette, then check to make sure that you are using the appropriate wavelengths for your scan and that you have enough probe.

      • If neither of these work, then you might have an unforeseen quencher in your cuvette. Try a different solvent, and/or a different fluorophore.

    If you see the green light hitting the front of the cuvette, but not going through the sample (like Fig. 11.1), then reduce the concentration of your probe by at least a factor of 10 and look again. If the beam gets weaker as it goes through the cuvette, you still need to dilute.

  1. 2.

    My spectrum starts high and crashes down, like an intense ski slope

    You probably have too much Rayleigh scattered light (Fig. 11.5). Start the scan at a higher (i.e. 5–10 nm) wavelength. Or use a cut-on optical filter to eliminate lower wavelength emission.

    Take a background spectrum to check for impurities – this should always be done even if your spectrum doesn’t look weird.

    Make sure there isn’t lint, debris or other stuff floating around in your cuvette.

    Also, make sure there aren’t tiny little bubbles in the cuvette due to pipetting cold solution directly into the room temperature cuvette.

  2. 3.

    The intensity of my spectrum is reduced every time I scan.

    Thermal heating from shining light on your sample may reduce the intensity. If your sample holder does not have a thermal jacket, then try to make sure your sample remains at the desired temperature through the scan. This might involve scanning quickly for cooler samples, or thermally equilibrating the sample in the optical module.

    Photobleaching, the light-induced breakdown of a fluorophore (usually by oxidation), can kill your fluorescence. Minimize how much you illuminate the sample with excitation as much as you can. Photobleaching can sometimes be avoided by purging the sample and the optical module with an inert gas such as Argon or Nitrogen. If your sample contains cells that require oxygen, you may need to use a different fluorophore if you can.

    Some samples (like cell suspensions) may settle during the time of the measurements, so that the cells are no longer in the excitation beam. Settling can be avoided by gently stirring the sample (if possible) or by increasing the density of the solvent to keep the sample buoyant.

  3. 4.

    My spectra has funny bumps.

    Take a background spectrum to make sure these aren’t due to solvent scattering and /or impurities. If not, then it is possible that the fluorophore itself has multiple peaks due to changes in ionization in the excited state , or a rich vibrational structure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thompson, R.B., Scarlata, S.F. (2018). Fluorescence Made Easier: Fluorescence Techniques for the Novice Episode 3:. Avoiding Those Pesky Artifacts: Sources of Error in Spectra and Steady State Measurements. In: Geddes, C. (eds) Reviews in Fluorescence 2017. Reviews in Fluorescence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01569-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics