Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Automated Classification of Plaques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ultrasound and Carotid Bifurcation Atherosclerosis

  • 1980 Accesses

Abstract

Atherosclerotic plaques appear in the carotid artery with normal aging, and 60–90% of the population at 60 years of age has identifiable plaques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Joakimsen O, Bonaa KH, Stensland-Bugge E, Jacobsen BK. Age and sex differences in the distribution and ultrasound morphology of carotid atherosclerosis: the Tromso Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19(12): 3007–3013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spence JD. Technology insight: ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque – patient management, genetic research, and therapy evaluation. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2(11): 611–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ebrahim S et al. Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: the British Regional Heart Study. Stroke. 1999;30(4):841–850.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Meer IM et al. Predictive value of noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis for incident myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 2004;109(9):1089–1094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wyman RA, Mays ME, McBride PE, Stein JH. Ultrasound-detected carotid plaque as a predictor of cardiovascular events. Vasc Med. 2006;11(2):123–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spence JD. Ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque as a surrogate outcome for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(4A):10B-15B; discussion 15B-16B.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sztajzel R, Momjian-Mayor I, Comelli M, Momjian S. Correlation of cerebrovascular symptoms and microembolic signals with the stratified gray-scale median analysis and color mapping of the carotid plaque. Stroke. 2006;37(3): 824–829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Belcaro G et al. Carotid and femoral ultrasound morphology screening and cardiovascular events in low risk subjects: a 10-year follow-up study (the CAFES-CAVE study(1)). Atherosclerosis. 2001;156(2):379–387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG, Schroeder TV, Vorstrup S, Sillesen H. Ultrasonic echolucent carotid plaques predict future strokes. Circulation. 2001;104(1):68–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kakkos SK et al. Texture analysis of ultrasonic images of symptomatic carotid plaques can identify those plaques associated with ipsilateral embolic brain infarction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(4):422–429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Touboul PJ et al. Mannheim intima-media thickness consensus. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18(4):346–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Bray JM, Baud JM, Daudzat M. Consensus concerning the morphology and the risk of carotid plaques. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;7:289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Urbani MP et al. In vivo radiofrequency-based ultrasonic tissue characterization of the atherosclerotic plaque. Stroke. 1993;24(10):1507–1512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. el-Barghouty N, Geroulakos G, Nicolaides A, Androulakis A, Bahal V. Computer-assisted carotid plaque characterisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995;9(4): 389–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilhjelm JE et al. Quantitative analysis of ultrasound B-mode images of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: correlation with visual classification and histological examination. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(6):910–922.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aly S, Bishop CC. An objective characterization of atherosclerotic lesion: an alternative method to identify unstable plaque. Stroke. 2000;31(8):1921–1924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedro LM et al. Computer-assisted carotid plaque analysis: characteristics of plaques associated with cerebrovascular symptoms and cerebral infarction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(2):118–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takiuchi S et al. Quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization can identify high-risk atherosclerotic alteration in human carotid arteries. Circulation. 2000;102(7):766–770.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Christodoulou CI, Pattichis CS, Pantziaris M, Nicolaides A. Texture-based classification of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(7):902–912.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stoitsis J, Tsiaparas N, Golemati S, Nikita KS. Characterization of carotid atherosclerotic plaques using frequency-based texture analysis and bootstrap. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:2392–2395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prahl U et al. Percentage white: a new feature for ultrasound classification of plaque echogenicity in carotid artery atherosclerosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36(2) 218–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jain AK, Duin RPW, Mao J. Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2000;2(1):4–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;3(6):610–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG. Pattern Classification. New York: Wiley; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin M, Nicolaides A, Kyriacou E. Normalisation of ultrasonic images of atherosclerotic plaques and reproducibility of grey scale median using dedicated software. Int Angiol. 2007;26(4):372–377.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Loizou CP et al. Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005;52(10): 1653–1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Persson J et al. Noninvasive quantification of atherosclerotic lesions. Reproducibility of ultrasonographic measurement of arterial wall thickness and plaque size. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12(2):261–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kofoed SC, Gronholdt ML, Wilhjelm JE, Bismuth J, Sillesen H. Real-time spatial compound imaging improves reproducibility in the evaluation of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27(10):1311–1317.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wendelhag I, Liang Q, Gustavsson T, Wikstrand J. A new automated computerized analyzing system simplifies readings and reduces the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness. Stroke. 1997;28(11):2195–2200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liang Q, Wendelhag I, Wikstrand J, Gustavsson T. A multiscale dynamic programming procedure for boundary detection in ultrasonic artery images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19(2):127–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Delsanto S et al. User-independent plaque characterization and accurate IMT measurement of carotid artery wall using ultrasound. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:2404–2407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Loizou C, Pattichis C, Pantziaris M, Nicolaides A. An integrated system for the segmentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007; 11(6):661–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boykov Y, Funka-Lea G. Graph cuts and efficient n-d image segmentation. Int J Comput Vis. 2006;70(2):109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Egger M, Spence JD, Fenster A, Parraga G. Validation of 3D ultrasound vessel wall volume: an imaging phenotype of carotid atherosclerosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(6):905–914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wolverson MK, Bashiti HM, Peterson GJ. Ultrasonic tissue characterization of atheromatous plaques using a high resolution real time scanner. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1983;9(6):599–609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Elatrozy T, Nicolaides A, Tegos T, Griffin M. The objective characterisation of ultrasonic carotid plaque features. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;16(3):223–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. el-Barghouty N, Nicolaides A, Bahal V, Geroulakos G, Androulakis A. The identification of the high risk carotid plaque. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11(4):470–478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wijeyaratne SM et al. A new method for characterizing carotid plaque: multiple cross-sectional view echomorphology. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(4):778–784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Asvestas P, Golemati S, Matsopoulos GK, Nikita KS, Nicolaides AN. Fractal dimension estimation of carotid atherosclerotic plaques from B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(9):1129–1136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson JM, Kennelly MM, Decesare D, Morgan S, Sparrow A. Natural history of asymptomatic carotid plaque. Arch Surg. 1985;120(9):1010–1012.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sterpetti AV et al. Ultrasonographic features of carotid plaque and the risk of subsequent neurologic deficits. Surgery. 1988;104(4):652–660.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Langsfeld M, Gray-Weale AC, Lusby RJ. The role of plaque morphology and diameter reduction in the development of new symptoms in asymptomatic carotid arteries. J Vasc Surg. 1989;9(4):548–557.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bock RW et al. The natural history of asymptomatic carotid artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17(1):160–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Belcaro G et al. Ultrasonic classification of carotid plaques causing less than 60% stenosis according to ultrasound morphology and events. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1993;34(4):287–294.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Liapis CD, Kakisis JD, Kostakis AG. Carotid stenosis: factors affecting symptomatology. Stroke. 2001;32(12):2782–2786.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mathiesen EB, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O. Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the Tromso study. Circulation. 2001;103(17):2171–2175.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sztajzel R. Ultrasonographic assessment of the morphological characteristics of the carotid plaque. Swiss Med Wkly. 2005;135(43–44):635–643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Biasi GM et al. Computer analysis of ultrasonic plaque echolucency in identifying high risk carotid bifurcation lesions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;17(6):476–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Matsagas MI et al. Computer-assisted ultrasonographic analysis of carotid plaques in relation to cerebrovascular symptoms, cerebral infarction, and histology. Ann Vasc Surg. 2000;14(2):130–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hashimoto H, Tagaya M, Niki H, Etani H. Computer-assisted analysis of heterogeneity on B-mode imaging predicts instability of asymptomatic carotid plaque. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(4):357–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Reiter M et al. Increasing carotid plaque echolucency is predictive of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. Radiology. 2008;248(3):1050–1055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fosse E et al. Repeated visual and computer-assisted carotid plaque characterization in a longitudinal population-based ultrasound study: the Tromso study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32(1):3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Nicolaides A et al. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(6):1486–1496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Waki H et al. Ultrasonic tissue characterization of the atherosclerotic carotid artery: histological correlates or carotid integrated backscatter. Circ J. 2003;67(12):1013–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hirano M et al. Rapid improvement of carotid plaque echogenicity within 1 month of pioglitazone treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 2009;203(2):483–488.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Nagano K et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque echogenicity by integrated backscatter analysis: correlation with symptomatic history and histologic findings. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(6):578–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yamada K et al. Effects of atorvastatin on carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a randomized trial for quantitative tissue characterization of carotid atherosclerotic plaques with integrated backscatter ultrasound. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(4):417–424.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Stoitsis J, Golemati S, Nikita KS, Nicolaides AN. Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis based on motion and texture features and clustering using fuzzy C-means. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2:1407–1410.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Stoitsis J, Golemati S, Tsiaparas N, Nikita KS. Texture characterization of carotid atherosclerotic plaque from B-mode ultrasound using gabor filters. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:455–458.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gray-Weale AC, Graham JC, Burnett JR, Byrne K, Lusby RJ. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B-mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1988;29(6):676–681.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Brohall G, Behre CJ, Hulthe J, Wikstrand J, Fagerberg B. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in 64-year-old Swedish women: experiences of using repeated oral glucose tolerance tests. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(2): 363–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wallenberg Laboratory for Cardiovascular Research, and Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Göran ML. Bergström, Ulrica Prahl & Peter Holdfeldt

Authors
  1. Göran ML. Bergström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulrica Prahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Holdfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Imperial College, London, W2 1PG, United Kingdom

    Andrew Nicolaides

  2. , Dept. Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195-6410, Washington, USA

    Kirk W. Beach

  3. Dept. Computer Science, University of Cyprus, Kallipoleos Street 75, Nicosia, 1678, Cyprus

    Efthivoulos Kyriacou

  4. Dept. Computer Science, University of Cyprus, Kallipoleos Street 75, Nicosia, 1678, Cyprus

    Constantinos S. Pattichis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergström, G.M., Prahl, U., Holdfeldt, P. (2011). Automated Classification of Plaques. In: Nicolaides, A., Beach, K., Kyriacou, E., Pattichis, C. (eds) Ultrasound and Carotid Bifurcation Atherosclerosis. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-688-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-688-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-687-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-688-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation