Abstract
A busy practice specializing in Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) will treat several dozen or more patients and generate hundreds or perhaps even thousands of frozen section pathology slides in a typical week. Over a year, this means that a practice must manage tens of thousands of glass slides in addition to the paper or electronic documentation associated with each patient. A single mislabeled, lost, or switched specimen may lead to devastating consequences for a patient. To reduce and prevent medical errors, developing a detailed plan for handling this volume of frozen section pathologic specimens is necessary. This chapter highlights the importance of proper methods for documentation, storage, and record keeping that are vital to providing high-quality care for patients undergoing MMS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Indicates a handoff point.
Abbreviations
- AAD:
-
American Academy of Dermatology
- CLIA:
-
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments
- CLSI:
-
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- MMS:
-
Mohs micrographic surgery
References
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000.
Elston DM, Stratman E, Johnson-Jahangir H, et al. Part II. Opportunities for improvement in patient safety. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:193–205.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Chapter IV Part 493 – Laboratory Requirements. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_04/42cfr493_04.html
Chaudhari R. Answers to frequently asked questions about CLIA standards for lab testing. Dermatol World. 2009;19 (11):8–9.
COLA. www.cola.org. Accessed September 1, 2010.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Clinical laboratory improvement amendments. http://www.cms.gov/CLIA/. Accessed September 1, 2010.
Lawson NS, Howanitz PJ. The College of American Pathologists, 1946–1996: quality assurance service. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:1000–8.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). www.clsi.org. Accessed September 1, 2010.
NCCLS. A quality management system model for health care; Approved guideline. 2nd ed. NCCLS document HS1-A2 [ISBN 1–56238–554–2].
NCCLS. Application of a quality management system model for laboratory services; Approved guideline. 3rd ed. NCCLS document GP26-A3 [ISBN 1–56238–553–4].
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Laboratory documents: development and control; Approved guideline. 5th ed. CLSI document GP2-A5 (ISBN 1–56238–600-X).
Barr JT, Schumacher GE. The total testing process applied to therapeutic drug monitoring. In: Schumacher GE, editor. Therapeutic drug monitoring. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1995. p. 47–82.
Howanitz PJ. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:1252–61.
Makary MA, Epstein J, Pronovost PJ, et al. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care. Surgery. 2007;141:450–5.
Wagar EA, Stankovic AK, Raab S, et al. Specimen labeling errors: a Q-probes analysis of 147 clinical laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1617–22.
Sandbank S, Klein D, Westreich M, et al. The loss of pathological specimens: incidence and causes. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:1084–6.
The Joint Commission. Accreditation program: office-based surgery. National Patient Safety Goals. 2010. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/2011_NPSGs_OBS.pdf.
Francis DL, Prabhakar S, Sanderson SO. A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen-labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:972–5.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Accuracy in patient and sample identification; Approved guideline. CLSI document GP33-A (ISBN 1–56238–721–9).
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Specimen labels: content and location, fonts, and label orientation; Proposed standard. CLSI document AUTO12-P (ISBN 1–56238–715–4).
NCCLS. Laboratory automation: data content for specimen identification; Approved standard. NCCLS document AUTO7-A [ISBN 1–56238–537–2].
McGinness JL, Goldstein G. The value of preoperative biopsy-site photography for identifying cutaneous lesions. Dermatol Surg. 2010;3:194–7.
Acknowledgment
We thank Audrey Anderson, Mayo Clinic Department of Dermatology and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Youse, J.S., Cook-Norris, R.H., Knudson, R.M., Roenigk, R.K., Roenigk, R.K. (2012). Tissue Specimen Documentation, Record Keeping, and Sample Storage. In: Nouri, K. (eds) Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2152-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2151-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2152-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)