Skip to main content

Patterns of Spread of Disease of the Pelvis and Male Urogenital Organs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Meyers' Dynamic Radiology of the Abdomen

Abstract

The urogenital organs develop from intermediate mesenchyme situated longitudinally in the trunk of an embryo between the splanchnopleuric and somatopleuric mesenchyme.1 2 It bulges into the coelomic cavity forming the medially located genital (or gonadal) ridge and the laterally located nephrogenic ridge on both sides of the gut. The mesenchymal tissues from the two ridges are interrelated to each other during the development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Healy JC, Hutson J, Collins P: Development of urogenital system. In Standring S (ed) Gray’s Anatomy – The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 40th ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London, 2008, pp 1305–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cochard LR: The urogenital system. In Cochard LR (ed) Netter’s Atlas of Human Embryology. Icon Learning System LLC, Teterboro, 2002, pp 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Healy JC, Cahill DJP, Chandra A, Davies CL, Khan N: Bladder, prostate and urethra. In Standring S (ed) Gray’s Anatomy – The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 40th ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London, 2008, pp 1245–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Healy JC, Davies CL, Freeman A, Khan N, Minhas S: Male reproductive system. In Standring S (ed) Gray’s Anatomy – The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 40th ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London, 2008, pp 1261–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Bladder Cancer Nomogram Consortium: Postoperative Nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:3967–3972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karakiewicz PI, Shariat S, Palapattu GS et al: Nomogram for predicting disease recurrence after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 2006; 176:1354–1361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez-Beltran A, Cheng L: Histologic variants of urothelial carcinoma: Differential diagnosis and clinical implications. Hum Pathol 2006; 37:1371–1388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nigwekar P, Amin MB: The many faces of urothelial carcinoma – an update with an emphasis on recently described variants. Adv Anat Pathol 2008; 15:218–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Woodward PJ, Manning MA, Davis CJ: Inflammatory and nonneoplastic bladder masses: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2006; 26:1847–1868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA et al: Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:715–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Leibel SA, Scardino PT: Imaging prostate cancer: A multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology 2007;243: 28–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang W, Epstein JI: Small cell carcinoma of the prostate – a morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 95 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32:65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansel DE, Epstein JI: Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the prostate: A study of 42 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30:1316–1321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartz LH, LaRenta LR, Bonaccio E et al: Small cell and anaplastic prostate cancer: Correlation between CT findings and prostate-specific antigen level. Radiology 1998; 208:735–738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, O’Donoghue MJ, Green DE: Tumors and tumorlike lesions of the testis: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:189–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ulbright TM: Germ cell tumors of the gonads: A selective review emphasizing problems in differential diagnosis, newly appreciated, and controversial issues. Mod Pathol 2005; 18:S61–S79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Young RH: Testicular tumors – some new and a few perennial problems. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132:548–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sohaib SA, Koh D-M, Husband JE: The role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and management of testicular cancer. AJR 2008; 191:387–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Claus FG, Hricak H, Hattery RR: Pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer: Role of MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy. RadioGraphics 2004; 24:S167–S180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cornud F, Flam T, Chauveinc L et al: Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: Factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 2002; 224:203–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leissner J, Hohenfellner R, Thuroff JW et al: Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: Significance for staging and prognosis. BJU Int 2000; 85: 817–823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Greene FL, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Shah JP, Winchester DP: Urinary bladder. In Greene FL et al (eds) AJCC Cancer Staging Atlas. Springer, New York, 2006, pp 329–335.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. May M, Kaufmann O, Hammermann F, Loy V, Siegsmund M: Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. BJU Int 2006; 99:539–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng L, Jones TD, Lin H et al: Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 2005; 174: 2181–2185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Quin DI, Henshall SM, Brenner PC et al: Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2003; 97:1884–1893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Merrilees AD, Bethwaite PB, Russell GL, Robinson RG, Delahunt B: Parameters of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens lack prognostic significance. Mod Pathol 2008; 21: 1095–1100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyers, M.A., Charnsangavej, C., Oliphant, M. (2010). Patterns of Spread of Disease of the Pelvis and Male Urogenital Organs. In: Meyers' Dynamic Radiology of the Abdomen. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5939-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5939-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5938-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-5939-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics