Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physicians’ Compliance with a Clinical Decision Support System Alerting during the Prescribing Process

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems have been shown to improve practitioner performance. Most systems designed to prevent medication errors generate lists with patients who fulfill the criteria of the algorithm. These lists are reviewed by a pharmacist and physicians are contacted by telephone. Presenting pop-up alerts as part of the workflow with a clear recommendation is a feature critical to success. Therefore we implemented three algorithms in a clinical decision support system alerting during the medication ordering process. We analyzed whether the recommendations in these alerts were followed. We evaluated 1. whether folic or folinic acid was co-prescribed more frequently within 48 h after ordering methotrexate, 2. whether vitamin D or analogues were co-prescribed more frequently within 48 h after ordering bisphophonates and 3. whether sodium lowering drugs were stopped more frequently within one hour in patients with hyponatremia. We analyzed the difference in the 48 days before implementation and the 43 days after implementation, using Pearson’s Chi2 test. Co-prescription of folic or folinic acid increased from 54 to 91% (p = 0.014), co-prescription of vitamin D or analogues increased from 11 to 40% (p = 0.001) and the number of stopped orders for sodium lowering drugs increased from 3 to 14% (p = 0.002). This clinical decision support system that alerts physicians for preventable medication errors during the medication ordering process is an effective approach to improve prescribing behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leendertse, A. J., Egberts, A. C., Stoker, L. J., van den Bemt, P. M., and HARM Study Group, Frequency of and risk factors for preventable medication-related hospital admissions in the Netherlands. Arch. Intern. Med. 168:1890–1896, 2008. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaushal, R., Shojania, K. G., and Bates, D. W., Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch. Intern. Med. 163:1409–1416, 2003. doi:10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., and Haynes, R. B., Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 293:1223–1238, 2005. doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A., and Lobach, D. F., Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 330:765, 2005. doi:10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Sijs, H., Aarts, J., Vulto, A., and Berg, M., Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(2):138–147, 2006. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Verduijn, M. M., van den Bemt, B. J., Dijkmans, B. A., van der Waal, R. I., and Horikx, A., [Correct use of methotrexate]. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 153:A696, 2009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dutch Society for Reumatology. Guideline Osteoporosis and Fracture Prevention [in Dutch: Richtlijn Osteoporose en Fractuurpreventie]. Third edition. Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2011. https://www.nhg.org/sites/default/files/content/nhg_org/uploads/osteoporose-en-fractuurpreventie.pdf.

  8. Scheepers-Hoeks, A. M., Grouls, R. J., Neef, C., Ackerman, E. W., and Korsten, E. H., Physicians’ responses to clinical decision support on an intensive care unit--comparison of four different alerting methods. Artif. Intell. Med. 59:33–38, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2013.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horsky, J., Aarts, J., Verheul, L., Seger, D. L., van der Sijs, H., and Bates, D. W., Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing. Int. J. Med. Inform. 97:1–11, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthijs L. Becker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding was received for performing this study.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baypinar, F., Kingma, H.J., van der Hoeven, R.T.M. et al. Physicians’ Compliance with a Clinical Decision Support System Alerting during the Prescribing Process. J Med Syst 41, 96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0717-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0717-4

Keywords

Navigation