Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of a drain in surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Results of a randomized and controlled clinical trial on 803 consecutive patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 15 June 2011

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of cavity drainage in the surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinuses.

Methods

The study was prospectively carried out in 803 patients randomized into two groups of respectively 401 and 402 patients. In the first group, primary excision and closure were associated with drainage of the wound; in the second group, the wound was not drained. We have analyzed time off work, time to walk without pain, time to sitting on the toilet without pain, recurrences, and wound infections. We have also evaluated the satisfaction rate and esthetic results.

Results

On comparing time off work, time to walk without pain, and time to sitting on toilet without pain postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the two groups. A significant difference between the two groups with regard to wound infection rates (p = 0.5) and recurrence rates (p = 0.6) was not observed. In order to prevent prolonged inpatient stay and social intolerance, this study suggests that the post-operative period is tolerated by a few when a drain was used. The visual analog scale (VAS) in the drained group was 3.2 ± 0.9, and VAS in the non-drained group was 3.5 ± 0.9 with a significant statistical difference (p = 0.0001). As regards the cosmetic appearance of the scar after surgery, we achieved a high satisfaction rate among patients in either group with 82.9% good cosmetic results.

Conclusions

The use of a drain, in our experience, appears to be useless in achieving a quick healing of the sacral wound; in addition, it has a low satisfaction rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Da Silva JH (2000) Pilonidal cyst: cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 43(8):1146–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N (2003) Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol 7:3–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCallum IJD, Peter MK, Julie B (2008) Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus systemic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336:868–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raghubir S, Nevil MP (2005) Adipo-fascio-cutaneous flaps in the treatment of pilonidal sinus: experience with 50 cases. Asian J Surg 28(3):198–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anyanwa AC, Williams A, Hossain S, Montgomery AC (1998) Karydakis operation for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: experience in a District General Hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:197–199

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garrido A, Ali R, Ramakrishnan V, Spyrou G, Stanley PR (2002) Reconstruction of the natal cleft with a perforator-based flap. Br J Plast Surg 55(8):671–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Shaer WM (2010) The modified gluteal sliding plication closure in the treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:887–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahdy T (2008) Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1816–1822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akinci OF, Coskun A, Uzunkoy A (2000) Simple and effective surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 43:701–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M (2005) Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg 190(3):388–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Allen-Mersh TG (1990) Pilonidal sinus: finding the right track for treatment. Br J Surg 77:123–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Surrell JA (1994) Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am 74:1309–1315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brook I, Anderson KD, Controni G, Rodriguez WJ (1980) Aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of pilonidal cyst abscess in children. Am J Dis Child 134:679–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Erdem E, Sungurtekin U, Nessar M (1998) Are postoperative drains necessary with the Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus? Dis Colon Rectum 41:1421–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Serour F, Somekh E, Krutman B, Gorenstein A (2002) Excision with primary closure and suction drainage for pilonidal sinus in adolescent patients. Pediatr Surg Int 18:159–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doll D, Novotny A, Rothe R, Kristiansen JE, Wietelmann K, Boulesteix AL, Dusel W, Petersen S (2008) Methylene Blue halves the long-term recurrence rate in acute pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Isbister WH, Prasad J (1995) Pilonidal disease. Aust N Z J Surg 65:561–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Erdem E, Sungurtekin U, Nessar M (1998) Are postoperative drains necessary with the Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus? Dis Colon Rectum 41(11):1427–1431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Corman ML (1989) Colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 297–304

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khaira HS, Brown JH (1995) Excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:242–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brasel KJ, Gottesman L, Vasilevsky CA (2010) Members of the Evidence-Based Reviews in Surgery Group. Meta-analysis comparing healing by primary closure and open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus. J Am Coll Surg 211(3):431–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Otto A, Papp C (1997) Definite surgical treatment of complicated recurrent pilonidal disease with a modified fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. Surgery 121:258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Morell V, Brian LC (1991) Surgical treatment of pilonidal disease: comparison of three different methods in fifty-nine cases. Mil Med 156:144–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holm J, Hulten L (1970) Simple primary closure for pilonidal sinus. Acta Chir Scand 136:537–540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmerman CE (1984) Outpatient excision and primary closure of pilonidal cysts and sinuses. Long-term follow-up. Am J Surg 148:658–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Hassan HK, Francis IM, Negl EN (1990) Primary closure or secondary granulation after excision of pilonidal sinus. Acta Chir Scand 156:695–699

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Khatri V, Espinosa MH, Amin AK (1994) Management of recurrent pilonidal sinus by simple V-Y fasciocutaneous flap. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1232–1235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Spivak H, Brooks VL, Nussbaum M, Friedman I (1996) Treatment of chronic pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1136–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sondenaa K, Nesvik I, Gullaksen FP, Furnes A, Harbo SO, Weyessa S, Soreide JA (1995) The role of cefoxitin prophylaxis in chronic pilonidal sinus treated with excision and primary suture. J Am Coll Surg 180:157–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Perruchoud C, Vuilleumier H, Givel JC (2002) Pilonidal sinus: how to choose between excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure? Study of a series of 141 patients operated on from 1991 to 1995. Swiss Surg 8:255–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dalenback J, Magnusson O, Wedel N, Rimback G (2004) Prospective follow-up after ambulatory plain midline excision of pilonidal sinus and primary suture under local anaesthesia- efficient, sufficient, and persistent. Colorectal Dis 6:488–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Anyanwu AC, Hossain S, Williams A, Montgomery AC (1998) Karydakis operation for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: experience in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:197–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Khayat H, Al-khayat H, Sadeq A, Groof A, Haider HH, Hayati H, Shamsah A, Zarka ZA, Al-Hajj H, Al-Momen A (2007) Risk factors for wound complication in pilonidal sinus procedures. J Am Coll Surg 205(3):439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bascom J (1980) Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and result of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery 87:567–572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Karydakis GE (1992) Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. ANZ J Surg 62:385–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kitchen PR (1996) Pilonidal sinus: experience with the Karydakis flap. Br J Surg 83:1452–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nessar G, Kayaalp C, Seven C (2004) Elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus. Am J Surg 187:300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bascom J, Bascom T (2007) Utility of the cleft lift procedure in refractory pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 193:606–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Holmebakk T, Nesbakken A (2005) Surgery for pilonidal disease. Scand J Surg 94:43–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jenkinon C, Coulter A, Wright L (1999) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 306:1437–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS-36 item short form health survey (SF36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y (2001) The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology 95:1356–1361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. El-Khadrawy O, Hashish M, Ismail K, Shalaby H (2009) Outcome of the rhomboid flap for recurrent pilonidal disease. World J Surg 33(5):1064–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohamed HA, Kadry I, Adly S (2005) Comparison between three therapeutic modalities for non-complicated pilonidal sinus disease. Surgeon 3(2):73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Bononi M, Farnasari V, Miccini M, Drumo A, Colace L (2008) Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture. Am J Surg 196:28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, Dag A, Akca T, Aydin S (2010) A randomized clinical study evaluating the need for drainage after Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus. J Surg Res 158:127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Khanna J, Mohil RS, Chintamani BD, Mittal MK, Sahoo M, Mehrotra M (2005) Is the routine drainage after surgery for thyroid necessary? A prospective randomized clinical study [ISRCTN63623153]. BMC Surg 5:11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mengal B, Aebi J, Rodriguez A, Lemaire R (2001) A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hoffmann J, Lorentzen M (1985) Drainage after cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 72:423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hoffmann J, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Damm P, Jensen R (1987) A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 30:449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim YI, Hwang YJ, Chun JM, Chun BY (2007) Practical experience of a no abdominal drainage policy in patients undergoing liver resection. Hepatogastroenterology 54:1542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tabaqchali MA, Hanson JM, Proud G (1999) Drains for thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy: fact or fiction? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 81(5):302–305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Suslu N, Vural S, Oncel M, Demirca B, Gezen FC, Tuzun B, Erginel T, Dalkiliç G (2006) Is the insertion of drains after uncomplicated thyroid surgery always necessary? Surg Today 36(3):215–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Clark MP, Patel NN, Farrell RW (2002) Drain placement after thyroid surgery: the bra-strap line. J Laryngol Otol 116(9):722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gurer A, Gomceli I, Ozdogan M, Ozlem N, Sozen S, Aydin R (2005) Is routine cavity drainage necessary in Kardakis flap operation? A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tritapepe R, Di Padova C (2002) Excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus using a drain for antiseptic wound flushing. Am J Surg 183:209–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Williams RS (1990) A simple technique for successful primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:313–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2010) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. Issue 1. Art. no.: CD006213

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Orthopedy, Traumatology and Emergency, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy

    Milone Marco, Musella Mario, Salvatore Giuseppe, Leongito Maddalena & Milone Francesco

Authors
  1. Milone Marco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Musella Mario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salvatore Giuseppe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leongito Maddalena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Milone Francesco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milone Marco.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1256-y

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marco, M., Mario, M., Giuseppe, S. et al. Effectiveness of a drain in surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Results of a randomized and controlled clinical trial on 803 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 26, 1601–1607 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1242-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1242-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation