Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Severe Renal Failure and Haemodialysis on the Pharmacokinetics of Levosimendan and Its Metabolites

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objectives

Levosimendan is a calcium sensitiser developed for the treatment of congestive heart failure. It increases myocardial contractility, reduces the filling pressure and dilates both the peripheral and coronary vessels. The circulating metabolites of levosimendan, OR-1855 and OR-1896, are formed and eliminated slowly after intravenous administration of levosimendan. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of impaired renal function and haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of levosimendan, OR-1855 and OR-1896.

Study design

This study was an open-label, nonrandomised, phase I pharmacokinetic study. Levosimendan was administered as a single-dose infusion of 0.1 μg/kg/minute for 24 hours. The follow-up period lasted 3 weeks.

Study setting

Twenty-five patients were included: 12 patients with severe chronic renal failure (CRF) with creatinine clearance of <30 mL/minute/1.73m2 and 13 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing haemodialysis. A group of 12 healthy subjects served as controls.

Results

Levosimendan, the parent drug, was eliminated rapidly from the plasma after discontinuation of its infusion, with an elimination half-life (t½) [mean ±standard error of mean] of 1.5 ± 0.09 hours in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis, 1.0 ± 0.2 hours in patients with severe CRF and 0.91 ± 0.03 hours in healthy subjects. The t½ of levosimendan was significantly longer (p < 0.001) in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis than in healthy subjects. The t½ of OR-1855 and OR-1896 were 94.0 ± 20.4 hours and 96.5 ± 19.5 hours, respectively, in ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis compared with 60.8 ± 5.2 and 61.6 ± 5.2 hours, respectively, in healthy subjects (p = not significant). The t½ of OR-1855 was significantly longer (85.0 ± 13.6 hours) in patients with severe CRF than in healthy subjects (60.8 ± 5.2 hours, p < 0.05). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of the metabolites were approximately 2-fold higher in patients with ESRD undergoing haemodialysis and patients with severe CRF compared with healthy subjects. The mean unbound fraction (fu) of levosimendan in plasma was approximately 2% in each study group, whereas the fu of the metabolites was considerably higher (63−70%). In contrast to levosimendan, the metabolites were dialysable, with dialysis clearance of approximately 100 mL/minute. The haemodynamic responses and adverse event profiles were similar in the study groups, with headache, palpitations and dizziness being the most frequently recorded adverse events.

Conclusion

The t½ of the levosimendan metabolites was prolonged 1.5-fold and their AUC and Cmax were 2-fold higher in patients with severe CRF and ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis as compared with healthy subjects. These results suggest that the dose should be reduced when levosimendan is used for the treatment of congestive heart failure in patients with severe renal insufficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Table IV
Fig. 4
Table V

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Pagel PS, Harkin CP, Hettrick DA, et al. Levosimendan (OR-1259), a myofilament calcium sensitizer, enhances myocardial contractility but does not alter isovolumic relaxation in conscious and anesthetized dogs. Anesthesiology 1994; 81(4): 974–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Udvary E, Papp JG, Végh A. Cardiovascular effects of the calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, in heart failure induced by rapid pacing in the presence of aortic constriction. Br J Pharmacol 1995; 114(3): 656–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haikala H, Kaheinen P, Levijoki J, et al. The role of cAMP- and cGMP-dependent protein kinases in the cardiac actions of the new calcium sensitizer, levosimendan. Cardiovasc Res 1997; 34(3): 536–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haikala H, Kaivola J, Nissinen E, et al. Cardiac troponin C as a target protein for a novel calcium sensitizing drug, levosimendan. J Moll Cell Cardiol 1995; 27(9): 1859–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pollesello P, Ovaska M, Kaivola J, et al. Binding of a new Ca2+-sensitizer, levosimendan, to recombinant human cardiac troponin C. J Biol Chem 1994; 269(46): 28584–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yokoshiki H, Katsube Y, Sunagawa M, et al. Levosimendan, a novel Ca2+ sensitizer, activates the glibenclamide-sensitive K+ channel in rat arterial myocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 333(2–3): 249–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pataricza J, Hohn J, Petri A, et al. Comparison of the vasorelaxing effect of cromakalim and the new inodilator, levosimendan, in human isolated portal vein. J Pharm Pharmacol 2000; 52(2): 213–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Antila S, Pesonen U, Lehtonen L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levosimendan and its active metabolite OR-1896 in rapid and slow acetylators. Eur J Pharm Sci 2004; 23: 213–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kivikko M, Antila S, Eha J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levosimendan and its metabolites during and after a 24-hour continuous infusion in patients with severe heart failure. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 40: 465–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Antila S, Kivikko M, Lehtonen L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levosimendan and its circulating metabolites in patients with heart failure after an extended continuous infusion of levosimendan. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 57(4): 412–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kristof E, Sziketi G, Papp Z, et al. Cardiac responses to calcium sensitizers and isoproterenol in intact guinea pig hearts: effects on cyclic AMP levels, protein phosphorylation, myoplasmic calcium concentration, and left ventricular function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 853: 316–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Takahashi R, Talukder MAH, Endoh M. Effects of OR-1896, an active metabolite of levosimendan, on contractile force and aequorin light transients in intact rabbit ventricular myocardium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2000; 36(1): 118–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi R, Talukder MAH, Endoh M. Inotropic effects of OR-1896, an active metabolite of levosimendan, on canine ventricular myocardium. Eur J Pharmacol 2000; 400(1): 103–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lam YW, Banerji S, Hatfield C, et al. Principles of drug administration in renal insufficiency. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 32(1): 30–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimmitt DC, Shah AK, Arumugham T, et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous dolasetron mesylate in patients with renal impairment. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38(9): 798–806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson MA, Verpooten GA, Daniel MJ, et al. Single dose pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in subjects with impaired renal function and the effect of haemodialysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46(1): 21–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin DE, Chapelsky MC, Ilson B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of eprosartan in healthy volunteers and in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 38(2): 129–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Karara AH, Frye RF, Hayes PE, et al. Pharmacokinetics of abecarnil in patients with renal insufficiency. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 59(5): 520–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ritschel WA, Kearns GL. Handbook of basic pharmacokinetics…including clinical applications. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Pharmacists Association, 2004: 88–97

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association General Assembly; 2000 Oct, Edinburgh, Scotland

  21. Levey A, Coresh J, Balk E, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 137–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sandell EP, Hayha M, Antila S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levosimendan in healthy volunteers and patients with congestive heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995; 26: 57–62

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jonsson NE, Antila S, McFadyen L, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of levosimendan in patients with congestive heart failure. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 55: 544–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Follath F, Cleland JG, Just H, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomized double-blind trial. Lancet 2002; 360(9328): 196–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowland M, Tozer TN. Dialysis. In: Rowland M, Tozer TN, editors. Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. 3rd ed. Media (PA): Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 443–62

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zini R, Riant P, Barre J, et al. Disease-induced variations in plasma protein levels: implications for drug dosage regimens (Pt I). Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 19: 147–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zini R, Riant P, Barre J, et al. Disease-induced variations in plasma protein levels: implications for drug dosage regimens (Pt II). Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 19: 218–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chapelsky MC, Thompson-Culkin K, Miller AK, et al. Pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. J Clin Pharm 2003; 43(3): 252–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gibson TP, Nelson HA. Drug kinetics and artificial kidneys. Clin Pharmacokinet 1977; 2: 403–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kovacs SJ, Tenero DM, Martin DE, et al. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of eprosartan in haemodialysis-dependent patients with end-stage renal disease. Pharmacother 1999; 19(5): 612–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Orion Pharma. All authors, with the exception of Veli-Pekka Harjola, Petri Koskinen and Pertti J Pentikäinen, are employees of Orion Pharma. The authors acknowledge the nursing and technical staff at Helsinki University Central Hospital (Helsinki, Finland) and APEX Research (Munich, Germany), and the laboratory staff at Orion Pharma (Espoo, Finland). The authors would also like to thank Sirpa Laakso, MSc, for performing the protein-binding analysis and Drs Wenhui Zhang and Rajendra Pradham (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaakko Puttonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puttonen, J., Kantete, S., Kivikko, M. et al. Effect of Severe Renal Failure and Haemodialysis on the Pharmacokinetics of Levosimendan and Its Metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet 46, 235–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200746030-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200746030-00004

Keywords

Navigation