The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
EditorialFull Access

The Role of Psychotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic

In the wake of the COVID-19 viral pandemic, the world will likely experience a serious mental health crisis (1, 2). Even as the first wave of infection passes, stressors associated with COVID-19, including self-quarantine, social distancing, job loss, and threat of illness, will persist. These factors can be expected to have a significant impact on the human psyche and contribute to a secondary mental health epidemic (1, 3). Extrapolating from studies conducted in the aftermath of other disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina (4), Hurricane Sandy (5), and the terrorist attacks of September 11 (6), we can expect as much as 10% of the population to meet criteria for major depressive disorder (7) following a crisis and perhaps even more to meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (2). Risk factors for persistence of psychiatric symptoms postdisaster include exposure to trauma, minority status, low social support, and preexisting psychiatric illness (2), suggesting that the most vulnerable among us may grapple with the mental health consequences of the pandemic for years to come.

Psychotherapy is an essential part of the response to the COVID-19 crisis. As psychotherapists, we are uniquely qualified to explore with our patients the psychological sequelae of social isolation, job loss, fears of contagion, and grief. It is our privilege and obligation to support patients going through major life changes related to the pandemic, helping them to grapple with the upheaval that has been thrust upon all of us. With us, they can be seen, heard, and held in mind.

Strategies for supporting patients during the COVID-19 pandemic can be found in virtually all psychotherapeutic disciplines; now may be a good time to draw broadly from our rich psychotherapeutic armamentarium to help those in need. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can be used to modify maladaptive automatic negative thoughts about the pandemic, including excessive fears of contamination or hopelessness about maintaining social connections during periods of quarantine. Through behavioral activation and scheduling of pleasurable activities, it can also help address COVID-related inactivity and loss of regular daily routines. Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) allows us to frame the pandemic as a role transition, helping patients develop new skills to adapt more successfully to the challenges before them, including using technology to build social support during social isolation and problem solving for relationships negatively affected by the close quarters of home quarantine. Psychodynamically informed approaches encourage us to explore defenses such as rationalization and denial activated by pandemic-related deaths and loss, helping the patient to understand the impact of early childhood experiences on reactions to current stressors. Regardless of the approach used, therapists should adopt a supportive and humanistic stance, given this time of shared suffering. Recognizing that there are few among us who are unaffected by these extraordinary events, we can communicate that working together will help all of us optimally manage this crisis.

Paradoxically, as we strive to establish even better connections with our patients during these difficult times, connecting with them has become even more complicated. Use of video and telephone to deliver psychotherapy remotely, once the stuff of science fiction, has become the mainstay of psychotherapy delivery during the pandemic. The learning curve has been steep for some, especially psychotherapists and patients who are less comfortable or less experienced with technology. Fortunately, there is strong empirical support for telemedicine in psychiatry (8, 9), although evidence for remote delivery of psychotherapy is still limited. Reassuringly, a network meta-analysis of different methods of delivering CBT for depression found little difference in psychotherapy delivered remotely versus face to face (10). Similarly, IPT has been delivered remotely with evidence of efficacy (11). Thus, early reports are promising, and more studies are likely to emerge as remote delivery of psychotherapy becomes an established part of routine practice.

Psychotherapy clearly plays an important role in helping individuals address the psychological and behavioral health sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic. More information is needed about which psychotherapeutic approaches, delivery systems, supervision strategies, and dosing will optimally serve the needs of our patients and communities. The American Journal of Psychotherapy will continue to play its part by reviewing, accepting, and publishing high-quality articles on these topics. These publications will help to inform the field about psychotherapy best practices as we support our patients and each other during this difficult time. I wish safety and good health to all.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh.
Send correspondence to Dr. Swartz ().
References

1 Galea S, Merchant RM, Lurie N: The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing: the need for prevention and early intervention. JAMA Intern Med (Epub April 10, 2020)Google Scholar

2 Goldmann E, Galea S: Mental health consequences of disasters. Annu Rev Public Health 2014; 35:169–183Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3 Fiorillo A, Gorwood P: The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 63:e32Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4 Wang PS, Gruber MJ, Powers RE, et al.: Mental health service use among Hurricane Katrina survivors in the eight months after the disaster. Psychiatr Serv 2007; 58:1403–1411Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5 Lowe SR, Sampson L, Gruebner O, et al.: Mental health service need and use in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy: findings in a population-based sample of New York City residents. Community Ment Health J 2016; 52:25–31Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

6 Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H, et al.: Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:982–987Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7 Maguen S, Neria Y, Conoscenti LM, et al.: Depression and prolonged grief in the wake of disasters; in Mental Health and Disasters. Edited by Neria Y, Galea S, Norris FH. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009CrossrefGoogle Scholar

8 Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Bashshur N, et al.: The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions in mental disorders. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22:87–113Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

9 Gardner JS, Plaven BE, Yellowlees P, et al.: Remote telepsychiatry workforce: a solution to psychiatry’s workforce issues. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2020; 22:8Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10 Cuijpers P, Noma H, Karyotaki E, et al.: Effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive behavior therapy delivery formats in adults with depression: a network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2019;76: 700–707Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11 Dennis CL, Grigoriadis S, Zupancic J, et al.: Telephone-based nurse-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: nationwide randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2020; 216:189–196Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar