Abstract
Objective: Comparison of incidence of complications observed in circumcisions performed by traditional unlicensed individuals outside the hospital under the non-sterile conditions and in those performed by surgeons within hospital under surgical procedures. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study to determine the sort of complications and their incidence in 407 cases performed in two towns in our region by unlicenced traditional circumcisers (group 1) and 782 circumcision cases performed in Urology clinic by licenced surgeons (group 2) between April 1999 and August 2002. The complications were proportionally and statistically compared. Correlation between groups was assassed by Pearson correlation test and to compare the complication parameters chi-square test was used (p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). Results: The incidence of complications was higher in group 1. All complication parameters were found high in group 1 at a statistically significant extent. Conclusion: We could conclude that if the circumcision is performed by unlicensed traditional circumcisers instead of surgeons at the sterile hospital conditions it could result in severe early phase complications such as life-threatening or some late phase disorders with life long negative influences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Ozdemir (1997) ArticleTitleSignificant increased complication risks with mass circumcisions Br J Urol 80 136–139 Occurrence Handle9240193
MK Atikeler R Onur I. Geçit (2001) ArticleTitleIncreased morbidity after circumcision from a hidden complication Br J Urol 88 938–940
S Ozkan TA. Gürpınar (1997) ArticleTitleSerious circumcision complication: Penile shaft amputation and a new reattachment technique with a successful outcome J Urol 158 1946–1947 Occurrence Handle9334645
SAH Rizvi SAA Naqi M. Hussain (1999) ArticleTitleReligious circumcision: a Muslim view BJU Int 83 13–16 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1013.x
AMK. Rickwood (1999) ArticleTitleMedical indications for circumcision BJU Int 83 45–51 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1045.x Occurrence Handle10349414
Mirza FM. A study on complications of circumcision. Dissertation for fellowship CPSP. 1992.
E Neulender S Walfisch J. Kaneti (1996) ArticleTitleAmputation of distal glans during neonatal ritual circumcision-a rare complication Br J Urol 77 924–925 Occurrence Handle8705240
GR Gluckman ML Stoller MM. Jacobs (1995) ArticleTitleNewborn penile glans amputatiun during circumcision and successful reattachment J Urol 153 778–779 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005392-199503000-00070 Occurrence Handle7861536
LE Ponsk JH Ross N. Knipper (2000) ArticleTitlePenile adhesion after neonatal circumcision J Urol 164 495–496 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005392-200008000-00071 Occurrence Handle10893633
LS Baskin DA Canning HM. Synder (1997) ArticleTitleSurgical repair of urethal circumcision injures J Urol 158 2269–2271 Occurrence Handle9366374
Dunsmuir WD, Gorden EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int 1997: 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atikeler, M.K., Geçit, I., Yüzgeç, V. et al. Complications of Circumcision Performed within and Outside the Hospital. Int Urol Nephrol 37, 97–99 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-004-6077-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-004-6077-2