Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, with a diabetes group and a nondiabetes group from the general population

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to describe health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers by comparing their HRQL with that of a sample from the general population without diabetes (general population) and a subgroup with diabetes (diabetes population), and to examine the differences between groups by sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle factors.

Design and methods:

A cross-sectional study was made of 127 adults with current diabetic foot ulcer, recruited from six hospital outpatient clinics, a control sample categorized as a diabetes population (n = 221) from the Norwegian Survey of Level of Living, and a sample from the general population (n = 5903). Data on sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, cohabitation, education and employment) and lifestyle (body mass index [BMI] and smoking status) and HRQL (SF-36) were obtained.

Results:

In all the SF-36 subscales and in the two SF-36 summary scales, the patients with diabetic foot ulcer reported significantly poorer HRQL than the diabetes population. The most striking differences were for role limitation-physical (32.1 vs. 62.2, p < 0.001), physical functioning (57.5 vs. 77.3, p < 0.001) and role limitation-emotional (57.4 vs. 72.0, p < 0.001). The patients with foot ulcer had significantly lower HRQL than the general population on all scales, and in particular on role limitation-physical (32.1 vs. 74.3, p < 0.001), physical functioning (57.5 vs. 85.2, p < 0.001) and general health (50.1 vs. 74.3, p < 0.001). The most important sociodemographic characteristic that differed between the diabetic foot ulcer patients and the diabetes population was that significantly more of the foot ulcer patients were men living alone. The largest differences between the foot ulcer patients and the general population were that more of the foot ulcer patients were men, older, living alone, less well educated, and not working. The diabetic foot ulcer patients, the diabetes population and the general population differed in BMI: 28 kg/m2 in the foot ulcer patients, 27 kg/m2 in the diabetes population and 25 kg/m2 in the general population.

Conclusion:

Diabetic foot ulcer patients had much worse HRQL compared with the diabetes population and the general population, especially in physical health. Foot ulcer patients were more often men living alone, and obesity was a problem in both the foot ulcer patients and the diabetes population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stene LC, Midthjell K, Jenum AK, et al. (2004) [Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Norway]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 124(11):1511–1514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glasgow RE, Ruggiero L, Eakin EG, et al. (1997) Quality of life and associated characteristics in a large national sample of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 20(4):562–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alonso J, Ferrer M, Gandek B, et al. (2004) Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: Results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 13(2):283–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubin RR, Peyrot M (1999) Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 15(3):205–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Skeie S, Uhlving S (2003). [The relation between diabetes and foot ulcer – what is the situation in Norway?]. Diabetes for helsepersonell 4:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  6. Valensi P, Girod I, Baron F, et al. (2005) Quality of life and clinical correlates in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab 31(3 Pt 1):263–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abetz L, Sutton M, Brady L, et al. (2002) The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale (DFS): A quality of life instrument for use in clinical trials. Practical Diabetes Int 19(6):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tennvall G, Apelqvist J (2000). Health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers. J Diabetes Complications 14:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vileikyte L, Peyrot M, Bundy C, et al. (2003) The development and validation of a neuropathy- and foot ulcer-specific quality of life instrument. Diabetes Care 26(9):2549–2555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meijer JW, Trip J, Jaegers SM, et al. (2001) Quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Disabil Rehabil May 20 23(8):336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Huijberts MS, Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman AC, et al. (2005) Health-related quality of life of diabetic foot ulcer patients and their caregivers. Diabetologia 48(9):1906–1910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiber GE, Lipsky BA, Gibbons GW (1998) The burden of diabetic foot ulcers. Am J Surg 176(2A Suppl):5S–10S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hjelm K, Isacsson A, Apelqvist J, et al. (1996) Foreign- and Swedish-born diabetic patients–a population-based study of prevalence, glycaemic control and social position. Scand J Soc Med 24(4):243–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson D, Lager I, Nilsson PM (1999) Socio-economic characteristics and quality of life in diabetes mellitus–relation to metabolic control. Scand J Public Health 27(2):101–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jonsson PM, Nystrom L, Sterky G, et al. (2001) Sociodemographic predictors of self-rated health in patients with diabetes of short duration. Scand J Public Health 29(4):263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Claudi T, Cooper J, Midthjell K, et al. (2000) NSAM’s handlingsprogram for diabetes i allmennpraksis (The Norwegian College of General Practitioners’ program for general practice). Oslo, Norsk selskap for allmennmedisin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fowkes FG (1988) The measurement of atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease in epidemiological surveys. Int J Epidemiol 17:248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Sanders LJ, et al. (1998) Preventive foot care in people with Diabetes. Diabetes Care 21:2161–2177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Statistics Norway (2002). Survey of Level of Living 2002 cross-sectional survey. http://www.ssb.no/english/

  20. Hougen H, Gløboden M (2004). Survey of Level of Living 2002 – cross-sectional survey. Documentation report. (Samordnet levekarsundersokelse 2002 - tverrsnittsundersokelsen. Dokumentasjonsrapport). Statistics Norway (SSB Notater). p. 22

  21. International Diabetes Federation (IDF) 2003. Diabetes Atlas. http://www.idf.org/e-atlas

  22. National Institute of Health. National Heart Lung, and Blood Institute. North American for the Study of Obesity: NIH Publication Number 00–4084. October 2000

  23. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B (2000). SF-36 Health Survey: Manual & Interpretation Guide. 2 edn. Lincoln, RI, QualityMetric Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ahroni JH, Boyko EJ (2000). Responsiveness of the SF-36 among veterans with diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications 14(1):31–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson RM, Fitzgerald JT, Wisdom K, et al. (1997) A comparison of global versus disease-specific quality-of-life measures in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 20(3):299–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirsch A, Bartholomae C, Volmer T. (2000) Dimensions of quality of life in people with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Qual Life Res 9(2):207–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobson AM, de Groot M, Samson JA (1994). The evaluation of two measures of quality of life in patients with type I and type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 17(4):267–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lloyd CE, Orchard TJ (1999). Physical and psychological well-being in adults with Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 44(1):9–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ware J (1994). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual. Boston, Massachusetts, The Health Institute, New England Medical Center

    Google Scholar 

  30. Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, et al. (1998) Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1069–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, et al. (2003) Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: Application to clinical and public health practice: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation 107:499–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brod M (1998). Quality of life issues in patients with diabetes and lower extremity ulcers: Patients and care givers. Qual Life Res 7:365–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gafvels C, Lithner F, Borjeson B (1993). Living with diabetes: relationship to gender, duration and complications. A survey in northern Sweden. Diabet Med 10(8):768–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aalto AM, Uutela A, Aro AR (1997). Health related quality of life among insulin-dependent diabetics: Disease-related and psychosocial correlates. Patient Educ Couns 30(3):215–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rustoen T, Wahl AK, Hanestad BR, et al. (2004) Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in the general Norwegian population. Eur J Pain 8(6):555–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaw J, Zimmet P. (1999) The epidemiology of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Rev 7:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hjelm K, Nyberg P, Apelqvist J. (2002) Gender influences beliefs about health and illness in diabetic subjects with severe foot lesions. J Adv Nurs 40(6):673–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jenum AK, Lorentzen C, Anderssen SA, et al. (2003) Promoting physical activity in a multi-ethnic district – methods and baseline results of a pseudo-experimental intervention study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 10(5):387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cuipers P, Lammeren P von, Duzijn B (1999). Relation between quality of life and chronic illnesses in elderly living in residential homes: A prospective study. Int Psychogeriatrics 11(4):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fortin M, Lapointe L, Hudon C, et al. (2004) Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: A systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C et al. (2006) Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care. Qual Life Res 15:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Grimby A, Svanborg A (1997). Morbidity and health-related quality of life among ambulant elderly citizens. Aging Clin Exp Res 9:356–364

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wensing M, Vingerhoets E, Groel R (2001). Functional status, health problems, age and comorbidity in primary care patients. Qual Life Res 10:141–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cohen J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW et al. (2002) Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc 77(4):371–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Osoba D (1999). Interpreting the meaningfulness of changes in health-related quality of life scores: Lessons from studies in adults. Int J Cancer Suppl 12:132–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vileikyte L (2001). Diabetic foot ulcers: A quality of life issue. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 17:246–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Vileikyte L, Rubin RR, Leventhal H (2004). Psychological aspects of diabetic neuropathic foot complications: An overview. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 20(Suppl 1):S13-S18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Boulton AJM, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G et al. (2005) The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 336(12):1719–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Oslo University College, Oslo, Norway. The authors thank the patients, the diabetes nurses, and the hospitals, for making this study possible.

The data from the DP and the general population applied in this publication are based on the Survey of Level of Living 2002 in Norway. Deidentified data sets have been made available by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD). Statistics Norway (SSB) was responsible for sampling and␣interviewing. Neither NSD nor SSB are responsible for the analyses/interpretation of data presented here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lis Ribu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ribu, L., Hanestad, B.R., Moum, T. et al. A comparison of the health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, with a diabetes group and a nondiabetes group from the general population. Qual Life Res 16, 179–189 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0031-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0031-y

Keywords

Navigation