Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Micronaut Merlin automated broth microtiter system with the standard agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of mucoid and nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare a commercially available automated broth microdilution system (Merlin; Micronaut, Germany) with the standard agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of pulmonary isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Accurate susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates from cystic fibrosis patients is known to pose problems. Although commercially available automated test systems could facilitate susceptibility testing of such isolates in routine diagnostics, these systems have not been recommended thus far. However, a pilot study recently indicated that the Merlin system, which is based on an endpoint measurement rather than on growth curves, might be applicable in the susceptibility testing of isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. In the present study, the Merlin system was further evaluated using an extended panel of nonmucoid and mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. The results showed that the MICs obtained with the Merlin system tended to be lower than those obtained with the agar dilution method, a finding that became increasingly apparent when mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were tested. The correlation coefficients (r values) of the MIC results for all strains tested were between 0.6 and 0.8 for five of the seven antimicrobial agents, with r values exceeding 0.8 for only meropenem and ciprofloxacin. However, since the overall rate of serious discrepancies was within an acceptable range, the Merlin system appears to be applicable for routine clinical use in susceptibility testing of P. aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenstein BJ, Zeitlin PL (1998) Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 351:277–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Demko CA, Byard PJ, Davis PB (1995) Gender differences in cystic fibrosis: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. J Clin Epidemiol 48:1041–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyczak JB, Cannon CL, Pier GB (2002) Lung infections associated with cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:194–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tummler B, Bosshammer J, Breitenstein S, Brockhausen I, Gudowius P, Herrmann C, Herrmann S, Heuer T, Kubesch P, Mekus F, Romling U, Schmidt KD, Spangenberg C, Walter S (1997) Infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis. Behring Inst Mitt 98:249–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chernish RN, Aaron SD (2003) Approach to resistant gram-negative bacterial pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 9:509–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koch C, Høiby N (2000) Diagnosis and treatment of cystic fibrosis. Respiration 67:239–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burns JL, Saiman L, Whittier S, Krzewinski J, Liu Z, Larone D, Marshall SA, Jones RN (2001) Comparison of two commercial systems (Vitek and MicroScan-WalkAway) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 39:257–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haussler S, Ziesing S, Rademacher G, Hoy L, Weissbrodt H (2003) Evaluation of the Merlin, Micronaut system for automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia species isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22:496–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards (2002) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. NCCLS, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rajan S, Saiman L (2003) Pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Semin Respir Infect 17:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramsey BW (1996) Management of pulmonary disease in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 335:179–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saiman L, Burns JL, Whittier S, Krzewinski J, Marshall SA, Jones RN (1999) Evaluation of reference dilution test methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol 37:2987–2991

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Drenkard E (2003) Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Microbes Infect 5:1213–1219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Prince AS (2002) Biofilms, antimicrobial resistance, and airway infection. N Engl J Med 347:1110–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hentzer M, Teitzel GM, Balzer GJ, Heydorn A, Molin S, Givskov M, Parsek MR (2001) Alginate overproduction affects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm structure and function. J Bacteriol 183:5395–5401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C, Read RR, Morck D, Buret A (1999) The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid identification of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol 37:1771–1776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Inder Sarpal for outstanding technical assistance, Gisela Rademacher for helpful comments, and especially Dieter Bitter-Suermann for valuable discussions and strong encouragement. Financial support was provided by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Germany), project number 01KI0216.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Häussler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balke, B., Hoy, L., Weissbrodt, H. et al. Comparison of the Micronaut Merlin automated broth microtiter system with the standard agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of mucoid and nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23, 765–771 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1212-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1212-7

Keywords

Navigation